Source author record

Florian Dumpert

Florian Dumpert appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Machine Learning Applications Artificial Intelligence cs.CY

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

Goodness (of fit) of Imputation Accuracy: The GoodImpact Analysis

In statistical survey analysis, (partial) non-responders are integral elements during data acquisition. Treating missing values during data preparation and data analysis is therefore a non-trivial underpinning. Focusing on different data sets from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (DESTATIS), we investigate various imputation methods regarding their imputation accuracy. Since the latter is not uniquely determined in theory and practice, we study different measures for assessing imputation accuracy: Beyond the most common measures, the normalized-root mean squared error (NRMSE) and the proportion of false classification (PFC), we put a special focus on (distribution) distance- and association measures for assessing imputation accuracy. The aim is to deliver guidelines for correctly assessing distributional accuracy after imputation. Our empirical findings indicate a discrepancy between the NRMSE resp. PFC and distance measures. While the latter measure distributional similarities, NRMSE and PFC focus on data reproducibility. We realize that a low NRMSE or PFC seem not to imply lower distributional discrepancies. Although several measures for assessing distributional discrepancies exist, our results indicate that not all of them are suitable for evaluating imputation-induced differences.

preprint2020arXiv

Is there a role for statistics in artificial intelligence?

The research on and application of artificial intelligence (AI) has triggered a comprehensive scientific, economic, social and political discussion. Here we argue that statistics, as an interdisciplinary scientific field, plays a substantial role both for the theoretical and practical understanding of AI and for its future development. Statistics might even be considered a core element of AI. With its specialist knowledge of data evaluation, starting with the precise formulation of the research question and passing through a study design stage on to analysis and interpretation of the results, statistics is a natural partner for other disciplines in teaching, research and practice. This paper aims at contributing to the current discussion by highlighting the relevance of statistical methodology in the context of AI development. In particular, we discuss contributions of statistics to the field of artificial intelligence concerning methodological development, planning and design of studies, assessment of data quality and data collection, differentiation of causality and associations and assessment of uncertainty in results. Moreover, the paper also deals with the equally necessary and meaningful extension of curricula in schools and universities.

preprint2016arXiv

A short note on extension theorems and their connection to universal consistency in machine learning

Statistical machine learning plays an important role in modern statistics and computer science. One main goal of statistical machine learning is to provide universally consistent algorithms, i.e., the estimator converges in probability or in some stronger sense to the Bayes risk or to the Bayes decision function. Kernel methods based on minimizing the regularized risk over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) belong to these statistical machine learning methods. It is in general unknown which kernel yields optimal results for a particular data set or for the unknown probability measure. Hence various kernel learning methods were proposed to choose the kernel and therefore also its RKHS in a data adaptive manner. Nevertheless, many practitioners often use the classical Gaussian RBF kernel or certain Sobolev kernels with good success. The goal of this short note is to offer one possible theoretical explanation for this empirical fact.