BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Fengshi Niu

Fengshi Niu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
econ.EMApplicationsCryptography and SecurityMachine Learningmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Auction Throttling and Causal Inference of Online Advertising Effects

Causally identifying the effect of digital advertising is challenging, because experimentation is expensive, and observational data lacks random variation. This paper identifies a pervasive source of naturally occurring, quasi-experimental variation in user-level ad-exposure in digital advertising campaigns. It shows how this variation can be utilized by ad-publishers to identify the causal effect of advertising campaigns. The variation pertains to auction throttling, a probabilistic method of budget pacing that is widely used to spread an ad-campaign`s budget over its deployed duration, so that the campaign`s budget is not exceeded or overly concentrated in any one period. The throttling mechanism is implemented by computing a participation probability based on the campaign`s budget spending rate and then including the campaign in a random subset of available ad-auctions each period according to this probability. We show that access to logged-participation probabilities enables identifying the local average treatment effect (LATE) in the ad-campaign. We present a new estimator that leverages this identification strategy and outline a bootstrap procedure for quantifying its variability. We apply our method to real-world ad-campaign data from an e-commerce advertising platform, which uses such throttling for budget pacing. We show our estimate is statistically different from estimates derived using other standard observational methods such as OLS and two-stage least squares estimators. Our estimated conversion lift is 110%, a more plausible number than 600%, the conversion lifts estimated using naive observational methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Differentially Private Estimation of Heterogeneous Causal Effects

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in domains such as healthcare or social science often involves sensitive data where protecting privacy is important. We introduce a general meta-algorithm for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) with differential privacy (DP) guarantees. Our meta-algorithm can work with simple, single-stage CATE estimators such as S-learner and more complex multi-stage estimators such as DR and R-learner. We perform a tight privacy analysis by taking advantage of sample splitting in our meta-algorithm and the parallel composition property of differential privacy. In this paper, we implement our approach using DP-EBMs as the base learner. DP-EBMs are interpretable, high-accuracy models with privacy guarantees, which allow us to directly observe the impact of DP noise on the learned causal model. Our experiments show that multi-stage CATE estimators incur larger accuracy loss than single-stage CATE or ATE estimators and that most of the accuracy loss from differential privacy is due to an increase in variance, not biased estimates of treatment effects.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Minimax Risk and Uniform Convergence Rates for Nonparametric Dyadic Regression

Let $i=1,\ldots,N$ index a simple random sample of units drawn from some large population. For each unit we observe the vector of regressors $X_{i}$ and, for each of the $N\left(N-1\right)$ ordered pairs of units, an outcome $Y_{ij}$. The outcomes $Y_{ij}$ and $Y_{kl}$ are independent if their indices are disjoint, but dependent otherwise (i.e., "dyadically dependent"). Let $W_{ij}=\left(X_{i}',X_{j}'\right)'$; using the sampled data we seek to construct a nonparametric estimate of the mean regression function $g\left(W_{ij}\right)\overset{def}{\equiv}\mathbb{E}\left[\left.Y_{ij}\right|X_{i},X_{j}\right].$ We present two sets of results. First, we calculate lower bounds on the minimax risk for estimating the regression function at (i) a point and (ii) under the infinity norm. Second, we calculate (i) pointwise and (ii) uniform convergence rates for the dyadic analog of the familiar Nadaraya-Watson (NW) kernel regression estimator. We show that the NW kernel regression estimator achieves the optimal rates suggested by our risk bounds when an appropriate bandwidth sequence is chosen. This optimal rate differs from the one available under iid data: the effective sample size is smaller and $d_W=\mathrm{dim}(W_{ij})$ influences the rate differently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access