Researcher profile

Fabio Giardina

Fabio Giardina contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Collective phototactic robotectonics

Cooperative task execution, a hallmark of eusociality, is enabled by local interactions between the agents and the environment through a dynamically evolving communication signal. Inspired by the collective behavior of social insects whose dynamics is modulated by interactions with the environment, we show that a robot collective can successfully nucleate a construction site via a trapping instability and cooperatively build organized structures. The same robot collective can also perform de-construction with a simple change in the behavioral parameter. These behaviors belong to a two-dimensional phase space of cooperative behaviors defined by agent-agent interaction (cooperation) along one axis and the agent-environment interaction (collection and deposition) on the other. Our behavior-based approach to robot design combined with a principled derivation of local rules enables the collective to solve tasks with robustness to a dynamically changing environment and a wealth of complex behaviors.

preprint2022arXiv

Modular representation and control of floppy networks

Geometric graph models of systems as diverse as proteins, robots, and mechanical structures from DNA assemblies to architected materials point towards a unified way to represent and control them in space and time. While much work has been done in the context of characterizing the behavior of these networks close to critical points associated with bond and rigidity percolation, isostaticity, etc., much less is known about floppy, under-constrained networks that are far more common in nature and technology. Here we combine geometric rigidity and algebraic sparsity to provide a framework for identifying the zero-energy floppy modes via a representation that illuminates the underlying hierarchy and modularity of the network, and thence the control of its nestedness and locality. Our framework allows us to demonstrate a range of applications of this approach that include robotic reaching tasks with motion primitives, and predicting the linear and nonlinear response of elastic networks based solely on infinitesimal rigidity and sparsity, which we test using physical experiments. Our approach is thus likely to be of use broadly in dissecting the geometrical properties of floppy networks using algebraic sparsity to optimize their function and performance.

preprint2022arXiv

Trade-off on Sim2Real Learning: Real-world Learning Faster than Simulations

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) experiments are commonly performed in simulated environments due to the tremendous training sample demands from deep neural networks. In contrast, model-based Bayesian Learning allows a robot to learn good policies within a few trials in the real world. Although it takes fewer iterations, Bayesian methods pay a relatively higher computational cost per trial, and the advantage of such methods is strongly tied to dimensionality and noise. In here, we compare a Deep Bayesian Learning algorithm with a model-free DRL algorithm while analyzing our results collected from both simulations and real-world experiments. While considering Sim and Real learning, our experiments show that the sample-efficient Deep Bayesian RL performance is better than DRL even when computation time (as opposed to number of iterations) is taken in consideration. Additionally, the difference in computation time between Deep Bayesian RL performed in simulation and in experiments point to a viable path to traverse the reality gap. We also show that a mix between Sim and Real does not outperform a purely Real approach, pointing to the possibility that reality can provide the best prior knowledge to a Bayesian Learning. Roboticists design and build robots every day, and our results show that a higher learning efficiency in the real-world will shorten the time between design and deployment by skipping simulations.