BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Eugen Tarnow

Eugen Tarnow appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Other Quantitative BiologyNeurons and Cognitionq-fin.EC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

A Precise Measure of Working Memory Reveals Subjects Difficulties Managing Limited Capacity

Free recall consists of two separate stages: the emptying of working memory and reactivation [1]. The Tarnow Unchunkable Test (TUT, [2]) uses double integer items to separate out only the first stage by making it difficult to reactivate items due to the lack of intra-item relationships. 193 Russian college students were tested via the internet version of the TUT. The average number of items remembered in the 3 item test was 2.54 items. In the 4 item test, the average number of items decreased to 2.38. This, and a number of other qualitative distribution differences between the 3 and 4 item tests, indicates that the average capacity limit of working memory has been reached at 3 items. This provides the first direct measurement of the unchunkable capacity limit of language based items. That the average number of items remembered decreased as the number of items increased from 3 to 4 indicates that most subjects were unable to manage their working memories as the number of items increased just beyond the average capacity. Further evidence for the difficulty in managing the capacity limit is that 25% of subjects could not remember any items correctly at least in one of three 4 item tests and that the Pearson correlation between the 3 item and 4 item subject recalls was a relatively small 38%. This failure of managing a basic memory resource should have important consequences for pedagogy including instruction, text book design and test design. Because working memory scores are important for academic achievement, it also suggests that an individual can gain academically by learning how to manage her or his capacity limit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Conditional Response Probabilities Confirm Two Stages of Free Recall, Working Memory Very Localized, Second Stage Delocalized, Both with Strong Tendencies to Forward Subsequent Recalls

Recently it was shown that free recall consists of two stages: the first few recalls empty working memory and a second stage concludes the recall (Tarnow, 2015; for a review of the theoretical prediction see Murdock, 1974). Here I investigate conditional response probabilities in Murdock's 40-1 (1962) free recall dataset. I find that the conditional response probabilities confirm the presence of two stages. The first stage is characterized by a large enhancement of the forward subsequent recall (up to 30 times chance) and a large suppression of backward recalls (up to 26 times smaller than chance for recalls between 10 and 40 items away). The second stage forward subsequent recall is enhanced by a factor of 5 and the probability of backward and forward recalls are concentrated at small distances. Thus both stages favor forward subsequent recalls. As in Tarnow (2015), the first stage is much more localized than the second stage. Working memory capacity is estimated in six ways to be about 4.5 word items for the 40-1 word list.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Contiguity is limited in free recall

Does the "law of contiguity" apply to free recall? I find that conditional response probabilities, often used as evidence for contiguity in free recall, have been displayed insufficiently, limiting the distance from the last item recalled, and only averaged over all items. When fully expanding the x-axis and examining the conditional response probabilities separately for the beginning, middle and end of the presented item list, I show that the law of contiguity applies only locally, even then only sometimes, and breaks down globally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Direct Evidence Delay with A Task Decreases Working Memory Content in Free Recall

Recently it was shown that free recall consists of two stages: the first few recalls empty the working memory and a second stage concludes the recall (Tarnow, 2015; for a review of the theoretical prediction see Murdock, 1974). It is commonly believed that a delay with a task before the recall starts removes the content of working memory (Glanzer & Cunitz, 1966). Here is presented the first direct evidence that this is indeed the case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

First direct evidence of two stages in free recall and three corresponding estimates of working memory capacity

I find that exactly two stages can be seen directly in sequential free recall distributions. These distributions show that the first three recalls come from the emptying of working memory, recalls 6 and above come from a second stage and the 4th and 5th recalls are mixtures of the two. A discontinuity, a rounded step function, is shown to exist in the fitted linear slope of the recall distributions as the recall shifts from the emptying of working memory (positive slope) to the second stage (negative slope). The discontinuity leads to a first estimate of the capacity of working memory at 4-4.5 items. Working memory accounts for the recency effect. The primacy effect comes from the second stage with a contribution also from working memory for short lists (the first item). The different slopes of the working memory and secondary stages, and that the two have different functional forms, accounts for the u-shaped serial position curve. The total recall is shown to be a linear combination of the content of working memory and items recalled in the second stage with 3.0-3.9 items coming from working memory, a second estimate of the capacity of working memory. A third, separate upper limit on the capacity of working memory is found (3.06 items), corresponding to the requirement that the content of working memory cannot exceed the total recall, item by item. This third limit presumably corresponds to the least chunked item. This is the best limit on the capacity of unchunked working memory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Free Recall Shows Similar Reactivation Behavior as Recognition & Cued Recall

I find that the total retrieval time in word free recall increases linearly with the total number of items recalled. Measured slopes, the time to retrieve an additional item, vary from 1.4-4.5 seconds per item depending upon presentation rate, subject age and whether there is a delay after list presentation or not. These times to retrieve an additional item obey a second linear relationship as a function of the recall probability averaged over the experiment, explicitly independent of subject age, presentation rate and whether there is a delay after the list presentation or not. This second linear relationship mimics the relationships in recognition and cued recall (Tarnow, 2008) which suggests that free recall retrieval uses the same reactivation mechanism as recognition or cued recall. Extrapolation limits the time to retrieve an additional item to a maximum of 7.2 seconds per item if the probability of recall is near 0%. Earlier upper limits for recognition and cued recall varied with the item type between 0.2 and 1.8 seconds per item (Tarnow, 2008). Implications include that there are only two types of short term memory: working memory and reactivation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Large individual differences in free recall

Using single factor ANOVA I show that there are large individual differences in free recall (η ranges from 0.09-0.26) including the total recall, the balance between recency and primacy, and the initial recall (subsequent recalls show smaller individual differences). All three memory properties are relatively uncorrelated. The variance in the initial position may be a measure of executive control and is correlated with total recall (the smaller the variation, the larger the recall).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Preliminary Evidence -- Diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease But Not MCI Affects Working Memory Capacity - 0.7 of 2.7 Memory Slots is Lost

Recently it was shown explicitly that free recall consists of two stages: the first few recalls empty working memory (narrowly defined) and a second stage, a reactivation stage, concludes the recall (Tarnow, 2015). It was also shown that the serial position curve changes in mild Alzheimer's disease, lowered total recall and lessened primacy, are similar to second stage recall and different from recall from working memory. The Tarnow Unchunkable Test (TUT, Tarnow, 2013) uses double integer items to separate out only the first stage, the emptying of working memory, by making it difficult to reactivate items due to the lack of intra-item relationships. Here it is shown that subject TUT selects out diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease but not MCI. On average, diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease is correlated with a loss of 0.7 memory slots (out of an average of 2.7 slots). The identification of a lost memory slot may have implications for improved stage definitions of Alzheimer's disease and for remediation therapy via working memory capacity management. In conjunction with the Alzheimer's disease process map, it may also be useful to identify the exact location of working memory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The Opium for the Poor Is Opium. Medicare Providers in States with Low Income Prescribe High Levels of Opiates

The majority of Medicare opioid prescriptions originate with family practice and internal medicine providers. I show that the average number of Medicare opium prescriptions by these providers vary strongly by state and that 54% of the variance is accounted for by the state median household income. I also show that there is a very similar relationship in opioid claims per capita and per Medicare recipient. In all cases Alabama is the state with the most claims and Hawaii is the state with the least claims.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access