Paper detail

Free Recall Shows Similar Reactivation Behavior as Recognition & Cued Recall

I find that the total retrieval time in word free recall increases linearly with the total number of items recalled. Measured slopes, the time to retrieve an additional item, vary from 1.4-4.5 seconds per item depending upon presentation rate, subject age and whether there is a delay after list presentation or not. These times to retrieve an additional item obey a second linear relationship as a function of the recall probability averaged over the experiment, explicitly independent of subject age, presentation rate and whether there is a delay after the list presentation or not. This second linear relationship mimics the relationships in recognition and cued recall (Tarnow, 2008) which suggests that free recall retrieval uses the same reactivation mechanism as recognition or cued recall. Extrapolation limits the time to retrieve an additional item to a maximum of 7.2 seconds per item if the probability of recall is near 0%. Earlier upper limits for recognition and cued recall varied with the item type between 0.2 and 1.8 seconds per item (Tarnow, 2008). Implications include that there are only two types of short term memory: working memory and reactivation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.