BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Erich Novak

Erich Novak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysisquant-phComputational Complexitymath.FA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Lower bounds for integration and recovery in $L_2$

Function values are, in some sense, "almost as good" as general linear information for $L_2$-approximation (optimal recovery, data assimilation) of functions from a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. This was recently proved by new upper bounds on the sampling numbers under the assumption that the singular values of the embedding of this Hilbert space into $L_2$ are square-summable. Here we mainly prove new lower bounds. In particular we prove that the sampling numbers behave worse than the approximation numbers for Sobolev spaces with small smoothness. Hence there can be a logarithmic gap also in the case where the singular numbers of the embedding are square-summable. We first prove new lower bounds for the integration problem, again for rather classical Sobolev spaces of periodic univariate functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Algorithms and Complexity for Functions on General Domains

Error bounds and complexity bounds in numerical analysis and information-based complexity are often proved for functions that are defined on very simple domains, such as a cube, a torus, or a sphere. We study optimal error bounds for the approximation or integration of functions defined on $D_d \subset R^d$ and only assume that $D_d$ is a bounded Lipschitz domain. Some results are even more general. We study three different concepts to measure the complexity: order of convergence, asymptotic constant, and explicit uniform bounds, i.e., bounds that hold for all $n$ (number of pieces of information) and all (normalized) domains. It is known for many problems that the order of convergence of optimal algorithms does not depend on the domain $D_d \subset R^d$. We present examples for which the following statements are true: 1) Also the asymptotic constant does not depend on the shape of $D_d$ or the imposed boundary values, it only depends on the volume of the domain. 2) There are explicit and uniform lower (or upper, respectively) bounds for the error that are only slightly smaller (or larger, respectively) than the asymptotic error bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Weak Tractability of the Clenshaw-Curtis Smolyak Algorithm

We consider the problem of integration of d-variate analytic functions defined on the unit cube with directional derivatives of all orders bounded by 1. We prove that the Clenshaw Curtis Smolyak algorithm leads to weak tractability of the problem. This seems to be the first positive tractability result for the Smolyak algorithm for a normalized and unweighted problem. The space of integrands is not a tensor product space and therefore we have to develop a different proof technique. We use the polynomial exactness of the algorithm as well as an explicit bound on the operator norm of the algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The Curse of Dimensionality for Numerical Integration of Smooth Functions II

We prove the curse of dimensionality in the worst case setting for numerical integration for a number of classes of smooth $d$-variate functions. Roughly speaking, we consider different bounds for the derivatives of $f \in C^k(D_d)$ and ask whether the curse of dimensionality holds for the respective classes of functions. We always assume that $D_d \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ has volume one and consider various values of $k$ including the case $k=\infty$ which corresponds to infinitely many differentiable functions. We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions, and in some cases a full characterization for the curse of dimensionality. For infinitely many differentiable functions we prove the curse if the bounds on the successive derivatives are appropriately large. The proof technique is based on a volume estimate of a neighborhood of the convex hull of $n$ points which decays exponentially fast if $n$ is small relative to $d$. For $k=\infty$, we also also study conditions for quasi-polynomial, weak and uniform weak tractability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Discontinuous information in the worst case and randomized settings

We believe that discontinuous linear information is never more powerful than continuous linear information for approximating continuous operators. We prove such a result in the worst case setting. In the randomized setting we consider compact linear operators defined between Hilbert spaces. In this case, the use of discontinuous linear information in the randomized setting cannot be much more powerful than continuous linear information in the worst case setting. These results can be applied when function evaluations are used even if function values are defined only almost everywhere.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the power of function values for the approximation problem in various settings

This is an expository paper on approximating functions from general Hilbert or Banach spaces in the worst case, average case and randomized settings with error measured in the $L_p$ sense. We define the power function as the ratio between the best rate of convergence of algorithms that use function values over the best rate of convergence of algorithms that use arbitrary linear functionals for a worst possible Hilbert or Banach space for which the problem of approximating functions is well defined. Obviously, the power function takes values at most one. If these values are one or close to one than the power of function values is the same or almost the same as the power of arbitrary linear functionals. We summarize and supply a few new estimates on the power function. We also indicate eight open problems related to the power function since this function has not yet been studied for many cases. We believe that the open problems will be of interest to a general audience of mathematicians.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Curse of Dimensionality for Monotone and Convex Functions of Many Variables

We study the integration and approximation problems for monotone and convex bounded functions that depend on $d$ variables, where $d$ can be arbitrarily large. We consider the worst case error for algorithms that use finitely many function values. We prove that these problems suffer from the curse of dimensionality. That is, one needs exponentially many (in $d$) function values to achieve an error $ε$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

Quantum Complexity of Integration

It is known that quantum computers yield a speed-up for certain discrete problems. Here we want to know whether quantum computers are useful for continuous problems. We study the computation of the integral of functions from the classical Hoelder classes with d variables. The optimal orders for the complexity of deterministic and (general) randomized methods are known. We obtain the respective optimal orders for quantum algorithms and also for restricted Monte Carlo (only coin tossing instead of general random numbers). To summarize the results one can say that (1) there is an exponential speed-up of quantum algorithms over deterministic (classical) algorithms, if the smoothness is small; (2) there is a (roughly) quadratic speed-up of quantum algorithms over randomized classical methods, if the smoothness is small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access