BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eran Shmaya

Eran Shmaya contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.PRComputer Science and Game Theorymath.STStatistics TheoryMachine Learningmath.COmath.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Equivalence between Random Stopping Times in Continuous Time

Two concepts of random stopping times in continuous time have been defined in the literature, mixed stopping times and randomized stopping times. We show that under weak conditions these two concepts are equivalent, and, in fact, that all types of random stopping times are equivalent. We exhibit the significance of the equivalence relation between stopping times using stopping problems and stopping games. As a by-product we extend Kuhn's Theorem to stopping games in continuous time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Rental harmony with roommates

We prove existence of envy-free allocations in markets with heterogenous indivisible goods and money, when a given quantity is supplied from each of the goods and agents have unit demands. We depart from most of the previous literature by allowing agents' preferences over the goods to depend on the entire vector of prices. Our proof uses Shapley's K-K-M-S theorem and Hall's marriage lemma. We then show how our theorem may be applied in two related problems: Existence of envy-free allocations in a version of the cake-cutting problem, and existence of equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisible goods and money.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Lipschitz Games

The Lipschitz constant of a finite normal-form game is the maximal change in some player's payoff when a single opponent changes his strategy. We prove that games with small Lipschitz constant admit pure ε-equilibria, and pinpoint the maximal Lipschitz constant that is sufficient to imply existence of pure ε-equilibrium as a function of the number of players in the game and the number of strategies of each player. Our proofs use the probabilistic method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The determinacy of infinite games with eventual perfect monitoring

n infinite two-player zero-sum game with a Borel winning set, in which the opponent's actions are monitored eventually but not necessarily immediately after they are played, is determined. The proof relies on a representation of the game as a stochastic game with perfect information, in which Chance operates as a delegate for the players and performs the randomizations for them, and on Martin's Theorem about the determinacy of such games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access