BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Emily Jensen

Emily Jensen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYSystems and ControlHuman-Computer InteractionMachine LearningRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An Explicit Parametrization of Closed Loops for Spatially Distributed Controllers with Sparsity Constraints

In this article, we study the linear time-invariant state-feedback controller design problem for distributed systems. We follow the recently developed system level synthesis (SLS) approach and impose locality structure on the resulting closed-loop mappings; the corresponding controller implementation inherits this prescribed structure. In contrast to existing SLS results, we derive an explicit (rather than implicit) parameterization of all achievable stabilized closed-loops. This admits more efficient IIR representations of the temporal part of the closed-loop dynamics, and it allows for the H2 design problem with closed-loop spatial sparsity constraints to be converted to a standard model matching problem, with the number of transfer function parameters scaling linearly with the closed-loop spatial extent constraint. We illustrate our results with two applications: consensus of first-order subsystems and the vehicular platoons problem. In the case of first-order consensus, we provide analytic solutions and further analyze the architecture of the resulting controller implementation. Results for infinite extent spatially invariant systems are presented to provide insight to the case of a large but finite number of subsystems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Mathematical Models of Human Drivers Using Artificial Risk Fields

In this paper, we use the concept of artificial risk fields to predict how human operators control a vehicle in response to upcoming road situations. A risk field assigns a non-negative risk measure to the state of the system in order to model how close that state is to violating a safety property, such as hitting an obstacle or exiting the road. Using risk fields, we construct a stochastic model of the operator that maps from states to likely actions. We demonstrate our approach on a driving task wherein human subjects are asked to drive a car inside a realistic driving simulator while avoiding obstacles placed on the road. We show that the most likely risk field given the driving data is obtained by solving a convex optimization problem. Next, we apply the inferred risk fields to generate distinct driving behaviors while comparing predicted trajectories against ground truth measurements. We observe that the risk fields are excellent at predicting future trajectory distributions with high prediction accuracy for up to twenty seconds prediction horizons. At the same time, we observe some challenges such as the inability to account for how drivers choose to accelerate/decelerate based on the road conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Structured-Closed-Loop versus Structured-Controller Design: the Case of Relative Measurement Feedback

We consider the optimal distributed controller design problem subject to two structural requirements: locality, i.e. available measurements and sub-controllers' interactions are governed by a graph structure, and relative feedback, i.e. only differences of measurements are available to the controller. We formalize controller locality in terms of the controller's transfer function, state-space realization, or resulting closed-loop mapping. We demonstrate that the relative feedback requirement can be written as a convex constraint on the controller and (in special cases) on the resulting closed-loop, and we characterize the allowable structures of relative feedback controllers. We prove that sparse closed-loop design is a convex relaxation of structured controller state-space design, even in the continuous time IIR setting. This formalizes and extends results of the recently developed System Level Synthesis framework. We take a first step toward quantifying the performance gap associated with this convex relaxation by constructing a class of examples (based on relative feedback requirements) for which the difference in performance, measured by an H2 norm, is infinite. The results presented are used to contrast several issues of structural constraints in distributed control design that remain as open problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access