BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Elena A. Erosheva

Elena A. Erosheva contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMethodologyMachine Learningmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Unified Statistical Learning Model for Rankings and Scores with Application to Grant Panel Review

Rankings and scores are two common data types used by judges to express preferences and/or perceptions of quality in a collection of objects. Numerous models exist to study data of each type separately, but no unified statistical model captures both data types simultaneously without first performing data conversion. We propose the Mallows-Binomial model to close this gap, which combines a Mallows' $ϕ$ ranking model with Binomial score models through shared parameters that quantify object quality, a consensus ranking, and the level of consensus between judges. We propose an efficient tree-search algorithm to calculate the exact MLE of model parameters, study statistical properties of the model both analytically and through simulation, and apply our model to real data from an instance of grant panel review that collected both scores and partial rankings. Furthermore, we demonstrate how model outputs can be used to rank objects with confidence. The proposed model is shown to sensibly combine information from both scores and rankings to quantify object quality and measure consensus with appropriate levels of statistical uncertainty.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape

In this article, we investigate the role of gender in collaboration patterns by analyzing gender-based homophily -- the tendency for researchers to co-author with individuals of the same gender. We develop and apply novel methodology to the corpus of JSTOR articles, a broad scholarly landscape, which we analyze at various levels of granularity. Most notably, for a precise analysis of gender homophily, we develop methodology which explicitly accounts for the fact that the data comprises heterogeneous intellectual communities and that not all authorships are exchangeable. In particular, we distinguish three phenomena which may affect the distribution of observed gender homophily in collaborations: a structural component that is due to demographics and non-gendered authorship norms of a scholarly community, a compositional component which is driven by varying gender representation across sub-disciplines and time, and a behavioral component which we define as the remainder of observed gender homophily after its structural and compositional components have been taken into account. Using minimal modeling assumptions, the methodology we develop allows us to test for behavioral homophily. We find that statistically significant behavioral homophily can be detected across the JSTOR corpus and show that this finding is robust to missing gender indicators in our data. In a secondary analysis, we show that the proportion of women representation in a field is positively associated with the probability of finding statistically significant behavioral homophily.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the validity of bootstrap uncertainty estimates in the Mallows-Binomial model

The Mallows-Binomial distribution is the first joint statistical model for rankings and ratings (Pearce and Erosheva, 2022). Because frequentist estimation of the model parameters and their uncertainty is challenging, it is natural to consider the nonparametric bootstrap. However, it is not clear that the nonparametric bootstrap is asymptotically valid in this setting. This is because the Mallows-Binomial model is parameterized by continuous quantities whose discrete order affects the likelihood. In this note, we demonstrate that bootstrap uncertainty of the maximum likelihood estimates in the Mallows-Binomial model are asymptotically valid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Partial-Mastery Cognitive Diagnosis Models

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are a family of discrete latent attribute models that serve as statistical basis in educational and psychological cognitive diagnosis assessments. CDMs aim to achieve fine-grained inference on individuals' latent attributes, based on their observed responses to a set of designed diagnostic items. In the literature, CDMs usually assume that items require mastery of specific latent attributes and that each attribute is either fully mastered or not mastered by a given subject. We propose a new class of models, partial mastery CDMs (PM-CDMs), that generalizes CDMs by allowing for partial mastery levels for each attribute of interest. We demonstrate that PM-CDMs can be represented as restricted latent class models. Relying on the latent class representation, we propose a Bayesian approach for estimation. We present simulation studies to demonstrate parameter recovery, to investigate the impact of model misspecification with respect to partial mastery, and to develop diagnostic tools that could be used by practitioners to decide between CDMs and PM-CDMs. We use two examples of real test data -- the fraction subtraction and the English tests -- to demonstrate that employing PM-CDMs not only improves model fit, compared to CDMs, but also can make substantial difference in conclusions about attribute mastery. We conclude that PM-CDMs can lead to more effective remediation programs by providing detailed individual-level information about skills learned and skills that need to study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access