Researcher profile

Edi Winarko

Edi Winarko contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Regional Development Classification Model using Decision Tree Approach

Regional development classification is one way to look at differences in levels of development outcomes. Some frequently used methods are the shift share, Gain index, the Iindex Williamson and Klassen typology. The development of science in the field of data mining, offers a new way for regional development data classification. This study discusses how the decision tree is used to classify the level of development based on indicators of regional gross domestic product (GDP). GDP Data Central Java and Banten used in this study. Before the data is entered into the decision tree forming algorithm, both the provincial GDP data are classified using Klassen typology. Three decision tree algorithms, namely J48, NBTRee and REPTree tested in this study using cross-validation evaluation, then selected one of the best performing algorithms. The results show that the J48 has a better accuracy rate which is equal to 85.18% compared to the algorithm NBTRee and REPTree. Testing the model is done to the six districts / municipalities in the province of Banten, and shows that there are two districts / cities are still at the development of the status quadrant relatively underdeveloped regions, namely Kota Tangerang and Kabupaten Tangerang. As for the Central Java Province, Kendal, Magelang, Pemalang, Rembang, Semarang and Wonosobo are an area with a quadrant of development also on the status of the region is relatively underdeveloped. Classification model that has been developed is able to classify the level of development fast and easy to enter data directly into the decision tree is formed. This study can be used as an alternative decision support for policy makers in order to determine the future direction of development.

preprint2012arXiv

Achieving Consensus with Individual Centrality Approach

This paper proposes a new consensus model in participatory decision making. The model employs advice centrality approach by electing a leader and recommender named as Supra Decision Maker (SDM). A SDM has a role as a decision bench-marker to other decision makers in evaluating each alternative with respect to given criteria. The weighting value for each alternative can be obtained by considering consensus level and preferences' distances between SDM and other Decision Makers. A social function using Social Judgment Scheme (SJS) concept is employed when a decision does not achieve the required consensus level. A simple example is presented here to illustrate our model. Keywords: Consensus, Group decision making, Centrality, Supra Decision Maker, Social Judgment Scheme

preprint2012arXiv

Parallelization of Maximum Entropy POS Tagging for Bahasa Indonesia with MapReduce

In this paper, MapReduce programming model is used to parallelize training and tagging proceess in Maximum Entropy part of speech tagging for Bahasa Indonesia. In training process, MapReduce model is implemented dictionary, tagtoken, and feature creation. In tagging process, MapReduce is implemented to tag lines of document in parallel. The training experiments showed that total training time using MapReduce is faster, but its result reading time inside the process slow down the total training time. The tagging experiments using different number of map and reduce process showed that MapReduce implementation could speedup the tagging process. The fastest tagging result is showed by tagging process using 1,000,000 word corpus and 30 map process.