BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tb. Ai Munandar

Tb. Ai Munandar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CY

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Implementation Of Fuzzy-C4.5 Classification As a Decision Support For Students Choice Of Major Specialization

Determination of major specialization is important to lead the student to focus on areas of study that are of interest as well as in accordance with its academic credentials. Currently, the determination of major specialization is done by asking directly to students, regardless of academic outcomes that have been achieved in the previo us semester. This study discusses the development of a hybrid model from fuzzy Mamdani and C4.5 algorithm to analyze the determination of major specialization in informatics engineering courses of Universities Raya Serang, where C4.5 algorithm is used as a shaper rule (rule) which is used in the inference stage. Establishment of rules (decision tree) performed using Weka applications, while for the determination of the decision support analysis specialization majors using Mamdani fuzzy concept, the application is done using the help of MATLAB. The results showed that 17 of the 126 students who either choose according to variable concentrations used in this study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Regional Development Classification Model using Decision Tree Approach

Regional development classification is one way to look at differences in levels of development outcomes. Some frequently used methods are the shift share, Gain index, the Iindex Williamson and Klassen typology. The development of science in the field of data mining, offers a new way for regional development data classification. This study discusses how the decision tree is used to classify the level of development based on indicators of regional gross domestic product (GDP). GDP Data Central Java and Banten used in this study. Before the data is entered into the decision tree forming algorithm, both the provincial GDP data are classified using Klassen typology. Three decision tree algorithms, namely J48, NBTRee and REPTree tested in this study using cross-validation evaluation, then selected one of the best performing algorithms. The results show that the J48 has a better accuracy rate which is equal to 85.18% compared to the algorithm NBTRee and REPTree. Testing the model is done to the six districts / municipalities in the province of Banten, and shows that there are two districts / cities are still at the development of the status quadrant relatively underdeveloped regions, namely Kota Tangerang and Kabupaten Tangerang. As for the Central Java Province, Kendal, Magelang, Pemalang, Rembang, Semarang and Wonosobo are an area with a quadrant of development also on the status of the region is relatively underdeveloped. Classification model that has been developed is able to classify the level of development fast and easy to enter data directly into the decision tree is formed. This study can be used as an alternative decision support for policy makers in order to determine the future direction of development.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Unsupervised Neural Network-Naive Bayes Model for Grouping Data Regional Development Results

Determination quadrant development has an important role in order to determine the achievement of the development of a district, in terms of the sector's gross regional domestic product (GDP). The process of determining the quadrant development typically uses Klassen rules based on its sector GDP. This study aims to provide a new approach in the conduct of regional development quadrant clustering using cluster techniques. Clustering is performed based on the average value of the growth and development of a district contribution compared with the average value and contribution of the development of the province based on data in comparison with a year of data to be compared. Testing models of clustering, performed on a dataset of two provinces, namely Banten (as a data testing) and Central Java (as the training data), to see the accuracy of the classification model proposed. The proposed model consists of two learning methods in it, namely unsupervised (Self Organizing Map / SOM-NN) method and supervised (Naive Bayess). SOM-NN method is used as a learning engine to generate training data for the target Class that will be used in the machine learning Naive Bayess. The results showed the clustering accuracy rate of the model was 98.1%, while the clustering accuracy rate of the model results compared to manual analysis shows the accuracy of the typology Klassen smaller, ie 29.63%. On one side, clustering results of the proposed model is influenced by the number and keagaraman data sets used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access