BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dominique Rossin

Dominique Rossin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsData Structures and AlgorithmsGenomicsQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

An algorithm for deciding the finiteness of the number of simple permutations in permutation classes

In this article, we describe an algorithm to determine whether a permutation class C given by a finite basis B of excluded patterns contains a finite number of simple permutations. This is a continuation of the work initiated in [Brignall, Ruskuc, Vatter, Simple permutations: decidability and unavoidable substructures, 2008], and shares several aspects with it. Like in this article, the main difficulty is to decide whether C contains a finite number of proper pin-permutations, and this decision problem is solved using automata theory. Moreover, we use an encoding of proper pin-permutations by words over a finite alphabet, introduced by Brignall et al. However, unlike in their article, our construction of automata is fully algorithmic and efficient. It is based on the study of pin-permutations in [Bassino, Bouvel, Rossin, Enumeration of pin-permutations, 2011]. The complexity of the overall algorithm is O(n log n + s^{2k}) where n denotes the sum of the sizes of permutations in the basis B, s is the maximal size of a pin-permutation in B and k is the number of pin-permutations in B.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

2-stack pushall sortable permutations

In the 60's, Knuth introduced stack-sorting and serial compositions of stacks. In particular, one significant question arise out of the work of Knuth: how to decide efficiently if a given permutation is sortable with 2 stacks in series? Whether this problem is polynomial or NP-complete is still unanswered yet. In this article we introduce 2-stack pushall permutations which form a subclass of 2-stack sortable permutations and show that these two classes are closely related. Moreover, we give an optimal O(n^2) algorithm to decide if a given permutation of size n is 2-stack pushall sortable and describe all its sortings. This result is a step to the solve the general 2-stack sorting problem in polynomial time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

2-Stack Sorting is polynomial

In this article, we give a polynomial algorithm to decide whether a given permutation $σ$ is sortable with two stacks in series. This is indeed a longstanding open problem which was first introduced by Knuth. He introduced the stack sorting problem as well as permutation patterns which arises naturally when characterizing permutations that can be sorted with one stack. When several stacks in series are considered, few results are known. There are two main different problems. The first one is the complexity of deciding if a permutation is sortable or not, the second one being the characterization and the enumeration of those sortable permutations. We hereby prove that the first problem lies in P by giving a polynomial algorithm to solve it. This article strongly relies on a previous article in which 2-stack pushall sorting is defined and studied.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Average-case analysis of perfect sorting by reversals (Journal Version)

Perfect sorting by reversals, a problem originating in computational genomics, is the process of sorting a signed permutation to either the identity or to the reversed identity permutation, by a sequence of reversals that do not break any common interval. Bérard et al. (2007) make use of strong interval trees to describe an algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. Combinatorial properties of this family of trees are essential to the algorithm analysis. Here, we use the expected value of certain tree parameters to prove that the average run-time of the algorithm is at worst, polynomial, and additionally, for sufficiently long permutations, the sorting algorithm runs in polynomial time with probability one. Furthermore, our analysis of the subclass of commuting scenarios yields precise results on the average length of a reversal, and the average number of reversals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Combinatorial bijections from hatted avoiding permutations in $S_n(132)$ to generalized Dyck and Motzkin paths

We introduce a new concept of permutation avoidance pattern called hatted pattern, which is a natural generalization of the barred pattern. We show the growth rate of the class of permutations avoiding a hatted pattern in comparison to barred pattern. We prove that Dyck paths with no peak at height $p$, Dyck paths with no $ud... du$ and Motzkin paths are counted by hatted pattern avoiding permutations in $\s_n(132)$ by showing explicit bijections. As a result, a new direct bijection between Motzkin paths and permutations in $\s_n(132)$ without two consecutive adjacent numbers is given. These permutations are also represented on the Motzkin generating tree based on the Enumerative Combinatorial Object (ECO) method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Combinatorial specification of permutation classes

This article presents a methodology that automatically derives a combinatorial specification for the permutation class C = Av(B), given its basis B of excluded patterns and the set of simple permutations in C, when these sets are both finite. This is achieved considering both pattern avoidance and pattern containment constraints in permutations.The obtained specification yields a system of equations satisfied by the generating function of C, this system being always positiveand algebraic. It also yields a uniform random sampler of permutations in C. The method presentedis fully algorithmic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Deciding the finiteness of the number of simple permutations contained in a wreath-closed class is polynomial

We present an algorithm running in time O(n ln n) which decides if a wreath-closed permutation class Av(B) given by its finite basis B contains a finite number of simple permutations. The method we use is based on an article of Brignall, Ruskuc and Vatter which presents a decision procedure (of high complexity) for solving this question, without the assumption that Av(B) is wreath-closed. Using combinatorial, algorithmic and language theoretic arguments together with one of our previous results on pin-permutations, we are able to transform the problem into a co-finiteness problem in a complete deterministic automaton.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

A variant of the tandem duplication - random loss model of genome rearrangement

In Soda&#39;06, Chaudhuri, Chen, Mihaescu and Rao study algorithmic properties of the tandem duplication - random loss model of genome rearrangement, well-known in evolutionary biology. In their model, the cost of one step of duplication-loss of width k is $α^k$ for $α=1$ or $α>=2 $. In this paper, we study a variant of this model, where the cost of one step of width $k$ is 1 if $k <= K$ and $\infty$ if $k > K$, for any value of the parameter $K in N$. We first show that permutations obtained after $p$ steps of width $K$ define classes of pattern-avoiding permutations. We also compute the numbers of duplication-loss steps of width $K$ necessary and sufficient to obtain any permutation of $S_n$, in the worst case and on average. In this second part, we may also consider the case $K=K(n)$, a function of the size $n$ of the permutation on which the duplication-loss operations are performed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access