Paper detail

A variant of the tandem duplication - random loss model of genome rearrangement

In Soda'06, Chaudhuri, Chen, Mihaescu and Rao study algorithmic properties of the tandem duplication - random loss model of genome rearrangement, well-known in evolutionary biology. In their model, the cost of one step of duplication-loss of width k is $α^k$ for $α=1$ or $α>=2 $. In this paper, we study a variant of this model, where the cost of one step of width $k$ is 1 if $k <= K$ and $\infty$ if $k > K$, for any value of the parameter $K in N$. We first show that permutations obtained after $p$ steps of width $K$ define classes of pattern-avoiding permutations. We also compute the numbers of duplication-loss steps of width $K$ necessary and sufficient to obtain any permutation of $S_n$, in the worst case and on average. In this second part, we may also consider the case $K=K(n)$, a function of the size $n$ of the permutation on which the duplication-loss operations are performed.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.