Paper detail

An algorithm for deciding the finiteness of the number of simple permutations in permutation classes

In this article, we describe an algorithm to determine whether a permutation class C given by a finite basis B of excluded patterns contains a finite number of simple permutations. This is a continuation of the work initiated in [Brignall, Ruskuc, Vatter, Simple permutations: decidability and unavoidable substructures, 2008], and shares several aspects with it. Like in this article, the main difficulty is to decide whether C contains a finite number of proper pin-permutations, and this decision problem is solved using automata theory. Moreover, we use an encoding of proper pin-permutations by words over a finite alphabet, introduced by Brignall et al. However, unlike in their article, our construction of automata is fully algorithmic and efficient. It is based on the study of pin-permutations in [Bassino, Bouvel, Rossin, Enumeration of pin-permutations, 2011]. The complexity of the overall algorithm is O(n log n + s^{2k}) where n denotes the sum of the sizes of permutations in the basis B, s is the maximal size of a pin-permutation in B and k is the number of pin-permutations in B.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.