Source author record

Dmitry Logachev

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
2topics
3close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2021arXiv

h1≠h1h^1\ne h_1 for Anderson t-motives

Let MM be an Anderson t-motive of dimension nn and rank rr. Associated are two Fq[T]\Bbb F_q[T]-modules H1(M)H^1(M), H1(M)H_1(M) of dimensions h1(M)h^1(M), h1(M)≤rh_1(M)\le r - analogs of H1(A,Z)H^1(A,\Bbb Z), H1(A,Z)H_1(A,\Bbb Z) for an abelian variety AA. There is a theorem (Anderson): h1(M)=r  ⟺  h1(M)=rh^1(M)=r \iff h_1(M)=r; in this case MM is called uniformizable. It is natural to expect that always h1(M)=h1(M)h^1(M)=h_1(M). Nevertheless, we explicitly construct a counterexample. Further, we answer a question of D.Goss: is it possible that two Anderson t-motives that differ only by a nilpotent operator NN are of different uniformizability type, i.e. one of them is uniformizable and other not? We give an explicit example that this is possible.

preprint2021arXiv

Reductions of Hecke correspondences on Anderson modular objects

We formulate some properties of a conjectural object Xfun(r,n)X_{fun}(r,n) parametrizing Anderson t-motives of dimension nn and rank rr. Namely, we give formulas for $\goth p$-Hecke correspondences of Xfun(r,n)X_{fun}(r,n) and its reductions at $\goth p$ (where $\goth p$ is a prime of Fq[θ]\Bbb F_q[θ]). Also, we describe their geometric interpretation. These results are analogs of the corresponding results of reductions of Shimura varieties. Finally, we give conjectural formulas for Hodge numbers (over the fields generated by Hecke correspondences) of middle cohomology submotives of Xfun(r,n)X_{fun}(r,n).

preprint2020arXiv

Calculation of h1h^1 of some Anderson t-motives

We consider Anderson t-motives MM of dimension 2 and rank 4 defined by some simple explicit equations parameterized by 2×22\times2 matrices. We use methods of explicit calculation of h1(M)h^1(M) -- the dimension of their cohomology group H1(M)H^1(M) ( = the dimension of the lattice of their dual t-motive M′M') developed in our earlier paper. We calculate h1(M)h^1(M) for MM defined by all matrices having 0 on the diagonal, and by some other matrices. These methods permit to make analogous calculations for most (probably all) t-motives. h1h^1 of all Anderson t-motives MM under consideration satisfy the inequality h1(M)≤4h^1(M)\le4, while in all known examples we have h1(M)=0,1,4h^1(M)=0,1,4. Do exist MM of this type having h1=2,3h^1=2,3? We do not know, this is a subject of further research.

preprint2015arXiv

Resultantal varieties related to zeroes of L-functions of Carlitz modules

We show that there exists a connection between two types of objects: some kind of resultantal varieties over C, from one side, and varieties of twists of the tensor powers of the Carlitz module such that the order of 0 of its L-functions at infinity is a constant, from another side. Obtained results are only a starting point of a general theory. We can expect that it will be possible to prove that the order of 0 of these L-functions at 1 (i.e. the analytic rank of a twist) is not bounded --- this is the function field case analog of the famous conjecture on non-boundedness of rank of twists of an elliptic curve over Q. The paper contains a calculation of a non-trivial polynomial determinant.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.