Researcher profile

Aleksandr Grishkov

Aleksandr Grishkov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

$h^1\ne h_1$ for Anderson t-motives

Let $M$ be an Anderson t-motive of dimension $n$ and rank $r$. Associated are two $\Bbb F_q[T]$-modules $H^1(M)$, $H_1(M)$ of dimensions $h^1(M)$, $h_1(M)\le r$ - analogs of $H^1(A,\Bbb Z)$, $H_1(A,\Bbb Z)$ for an abelian variety $A$. There is a theorem (Anderson): $h^1(M)=r \iff h_1(M)=r$; in this case $M$ is called uniformizable. It is natural to expect that always $h^1(M)=h_1(M)$. Nevertheless, we explicitly construct a counterexample. Further, we answer a question of D.Goss: is it possible that two Anderson t-motives that differ only by a nilpotent operator $N$ are of different uniformizability type, i.e. one of them is uniformizable and other not? We give an explicit example that this is possible.

preprint2021arXiv

Reductions of Hecke correspondences on Anderson modular objects

We formulate some properties of a conjectural object $X_{fun}(r,n)$ parametrizing Anderson t-motives of dimension $n$ and rank $r$. Namely, we give formulas for $\goth p$-Hecke correspondences of $X_{fun}(r,n)$ and its reductions at $\goth p$ (where $\goth p$ is a prime of $\Bbb F_q[θ]$). Also, we describe their geometric interpretation. These results are analogs of the corresponding results of reductions of Shimura varieties. Finally, we give conjectural formulas for Hodge numbers (over the fields generated by Hecke correspondences) of middle cohomology submotives of $X_{fun}(r,n)$.

preprint2020arXiv

Calculation of $h^1$ of some Anderson t-motives

We consider Anderson t-motives $M$ of dimension 2 and rank 4 defined by some simple explicit equations parameterized by $2\times2$ matrices. We use methods of explicit calculation of $h^1(M)$ -- the dimension of their cohomology group $H^1(M)$ ( = the dimension of the lattice of their dual t-motive $M'$) developed in our earlier paper. We calculate $h^1(M)$ for $M$ defined by all matrices having 0 on the diagonal, and by some other matrices. These methods permit to make analogous calculations for most (probably all) t-motives. $h^1$ of all Anderson t-motives $M$ under consideration satisfy the inequality $h^1(M)\le4$, while in all known examples we have $h^1(M)=0,1,4$. Do exist $M$ of this type having $h^1=2,3$? We do not know, this is a subject of further research.