Source author record

Alexandr N. Grishkov

Alexandr N. Grishkov appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Resultantal varieties related to zeroes of L-functions of Carlitz modules

We show that there exists a connection between two types of objects: some kind of resultantal varieties over C, from one side, and varieties of twists of the tensor powers of the Carlitz module such that the order of 0 of its L-functions at infinity is a constant, from another side. Obtained results are only a starting point of a general theory. We can expect that it will be possible to prove that the order of 0 of these L-functions at 1 (i.e. the analytic rank of a twist) is not bounded --- this is the function field case analog of the famous conjecture on non-boundedness of rank of twists of an elliptic curve over Q. The paper contains a calculation of a non-trivial polynomial determinant.

preprint2013arXiv

Solvable, reductive and quasireductive supergroups

This work was inspired by two natural questions. The first question is when Lie(G')=Lie(G)', where G is a connected algebraic supergroup defined over a field of characteristic zero. The second question is whether the unipotent radical of any normal supersubgroup H of G coincides with the intersection of H and G_u, where G_u is the unipotent radical of G. Both questions have affirmative answers in the category of algebraic groups (in the second case one has to assume additionally that G and H are reduced whenever char K >0). Surprisingly, using the technique of Harish-Chandra superpairs and a complete description of an action of an algebraic supergroup on an abelian supergroups by supergroup automorphisms we found out rather simple counterexamples to both questions. Besides, the second counterexample shows that the reductivity of G does not imply that G_{ev} has even finite unipotent radical. On the other hand, if G_{ev} is reductive, then it is easy to see that G_u is finite (odd) supergroup. In other words, the reductivity of an algebraic supergroup does not correspond to the reductivity of its largest even subgroup in contrast to such properties as unipotency or solvability. In the last section of our article we describe reductive algebraic supergroups in terms of sandwich pairs and give necessary and sufficient conditions for an algebraic supergroup to be quasireductive. The last result complements the recent Serganova's description of quasireductive supergroups in terms of structural properties of their Lie superalgebras. Our approach is focused on the normal subgroup structure.