BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dimity Miller

Dimity Miller contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionMachine LearningRoboticsArtificial IntelligenceCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Backdoor Mitigation in Object Detection via Adversarial Fine-Tuning

Backdoor attacks can implant malicious behaviours into deep models while preserving performance on clean data, posing a serious threat to safety-critical vision systems. Although backdoor mitigation has been studied extensively for image classification, defenses for object detection remain comparatively underdeveloped. Adversarial fine-tuning is a common backdoor mitigation approach in classification, but adapting it to detection is nontrivial as classification-oriented adversarial generation does not match the detection attack space, where attacks may cause object misclassification or disappearance, and standard detection losses can dilute the repair signal across many predictions. We address these challenges through a detection-aware adversarial fine-tuning framework for mitigating object-detection backdoors when the defender has access only to a compromised detector and a small clean dataset, without knowing the attack objective. For adversarial generation that does not require knowledge of the attack objective, we introduce soft-branch minimisation, which uses a soft gate to combine objectives aligned with misclassification and disappearance attacks, together with a detection-aware classification-loss maximisation. For targeted repair, we introduce a dual-objective fine-tuning loss applied to target-matched predictions, concentrating the defensive update on predictions most relevant to the backdoor behaviour. Experiments across CNN- and Transformer-based detectors show that our approach more effectively reduces attack success while preserving true detections, compared with classification-oriented baselines, and maintains competitive clean detection performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

From Pixels to Primitives: Scene Change Detection in 3D Gaussian Splatting

Scene change detection methods built on Gaussian splatting universally follow a render-then-compare paradigm: the pre-change scene is rendered into 2D and compared against post-change images via pixel or feature residuals. This change detection problem with Gaussian Splatting has been treated as a question about pixels; we treat it as a question about primitives. We provide direct evidence that native primitive attributes alone -- position, anisotropic covariance, and color -- carry sufficient signal for scene change detection. What makes primitive-space comparison hard is the under-constrained nature of Gaussian splatting representation: independent optimizations yield primitive solutions whose count, positions, shapes, and colors differ even where nothing has changed. We address this challenge with anisotropic models of geometric and photometric drift, complemented by a per-primitive observability term that reflects the extent to which each Gaussian is constrained by the camera geometry. Operating directly on primitives gives our method, GD-DIFF, two properties that distinguish it from render-then-compare methods. First, change maps are multi-view consistent by construction, where prior work had to learn this through an additional optimization objective. Second, geometric and appearance changes are scored separately, identifying not just where but what kind of change occurred, distinguishing structural changes (e.g., an added object) from surface-level ones (e.g., a color change) without supervision or external model dependencies. On real-world benchmarks, GS-DIFF surpasses the prior state-of-the-art approach by $\sim$17% in mean Intersection over Union.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Why Domain Matters: A Preliminary Study of Domain Effects in Underwater Object Detection

Domain shift, where deviations between training and deployment data distributions degrade model performance, is a key challenge in underwater environments. Existing benchmarks testing performance for underwater domain shift simulate variability through synthetic style transfer. This fails to capture intrinsic scene factors such as visibility, illumination, scene composition, or acquisition factors, limiting analysis of real-world effects. We propose a labeling framework that defines underwater domains using measurable image, scene, and acquisition characteristics. Unlike prior benchmarks, it captures physically meaningful factors, enabling semantically consistent image grouping and supporting domain-specific evaluation of detection performance including failure analysis. We validate this on public datasets, showing systematic variations across domain factors and revealing hidden failure modes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Never mind the metrics -- what about the uncertainty? Visualising confusion matrix metric distributions

There are strong incentives to build models that demonstrate outstanding predictive performance on various datasets and benchmarks. We believe these incentives risk a narrow focus on models and on the performance metrics used to evaluate and compare them -- resulting in a growing body of literature to evaluate and compare metrics. This paper strives for a more balanced perspective on classifier performance metrics by highlighting their distributions under different models of uncertainty and showing how this uncertainty can easily eclipse differences in the empirical performance of classifiers. We begin by emphasising the fundamentally discrete nature of empirical confusion matrices and show how binary matrices can be meaningfully represented in a three dimensional compositional lattice, whose cross-sections form the basis of the space of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We develop equations, animations and interactive visualisations of the contours of performance metrics within (and beyond) this ROC space, showing how some are affected by class imbalance. We provide interactive visualisations that show the discrete posterior predictive probability mass functions of true and false positive rates in ROC space, and how these relate to uncertainty in performance metrics such as Balanced Accuracy (BA) and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Our hope is that these insights and visualisations will raise greater awareness of the substantial uncertainty in performance metric estimates that can arise when classifiers are evaluated on empirical datasets and benchmarks, and that classification model performance claims should be tempered by this understanding.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

What's in the Black Box? The False Negative Mechanisms Inside Object Detectors

In object detection, false negatives arise when a detector fails to detect a target object. To understand why object detectors produce false negatives, we identify five 'false negative mechanisms', where each mechanism describes how a specific component inside the detector architecture failed. Focusing on two-stage and one-stage anchor-box object detector architectures, we introduce a framework for quantifying these false negative mechanisms. Using this framework, we investigate why Faster R-CNN and RetinaNet fail to detect objects in benchmark vision datasets and robotics datasets. We show that a detector's false negative mechanisms differ significantly between computer vision benchmark datasets and robotics deployment scenarios. This has implications for the translation of object detectors developed for benchmark datasets to robotics applications. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/csiro-robotics/fn_mechanisms

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Class Anchor Clustering: a Loss for Distance-based Open Set Recognition

In open set recognition, deep neural networks encounter object classes that were unknown during training. Existing open set classifiers distinguish between known and unknown classes by measuring distance in a network's logit space, assuming that known classes cluster closer to the training data than unknown classes. However, this approach is applied post-hoc to networks trained with cross-entropy loss, which does not guarantee this clustering behaviour. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Class Anchor Clustering (CAC) loss. CAC is a distance-based loss that explicitly trains known classes to form tight clusters around anchored class-dependent centres in the logit space. We show that training with CAC achieves state-of-the-art performance for distance-based open set classifiers on all six standard benchmark datasets, with a 15.2% AUROC increase on the challenging TinyImageNet, without sacrificing classification accuracy. We also show that our anchored class centres achieve higher open set performance than learnt class centres, particularly on object-based datasets and large numbers of training classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Probabilistic Object Detection: Definition and Evaluation

We introduce Probabilistic Object Detection, the task of detecting objects in images and accurately quantifying the spatial and semantic uncertainties of the detections. Given the lack of methods capable of assessing such probabilistic object detections, we present the new Probability-based Detection Quality measure (PDQ).Unlike AP-based measures, PDQ has no arbitrary thresholds and rewards spatial and label quality, and foreground/background separation quality while explicitly penalising false positive and false negative detections. We contrast PDQ with existing mAP and moLRP measures by evaluating state-of-the-art detectors and a Bayesian object detector based on Monte Carlo Dropout. Our experiments indicate that conventional object detectors tend to be spatially overconfident and thus perform poorly on the task of probabilistic object detection. Our paper aims to encourage the development of new object detection approaches that provide detections with accurately estimated spatial and label uncertainties and are of critical importance for deployment on robots and embodied AI systems in the real world.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access