Researcher profile

Diego Granziol

Diego Granziol contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Linear Approach to Data Poisoning

Backdoor and data-poisoning attacks can flip predictions with tiny training corruptions, yet a sharp theory linking poisoning strength, overparameterization, and regularization is lacking. We analyze ridge least squares with an unpenalized intercept in the high-dimensional regime \(p,n\to\infty\), \(p/n\to c\). Targeted poisoning is modelled by shifting a \(θ\)-fraction of one class by a direction \(\mathbf{v}\) and relabelling. Using resolvent techniques and deterministic equivalents from random matrix theory, we derive closed-form limits for the poisoned score explicit in the model parameters. The formulas yield scaling laws, recover the interpolation threshold as \(c\to1\) in the ridgeless limit, and show that the weights align with the poisoning direction. Synthetic experiments match theory across sweeps of the parameters and MNIST backdoor tests show qualitatively consistent trends. The results provide a tractable framework for quantifying poisoning in linear models.

preprint2022arXiv

A Random Matrix Theory Approach to Damping in Deep Learning

We conjecture that the inherent difference in generalisation between adaptive and non-adaptive gradient methods in deep learning stems from the increased estimation noise in the flattest directions of the true loss surface. We demonstrate that typical schedules used for adaptive methods (with low numerical stability or damping constants) serve to bias relative movement towards flat directions relative to sharp directions, effectively amplifying the noise-to-signal ratio and harming generalisation. We further demonstrate that the numerical damping constant used in these methods can be decomposed into a learning rate reduction and linear shrinkage of the estimated curvature matrix. We then demonstrate significant generalisation improvements by increasing the shrinkage coefficient, closing the generalisation gap entirely in both logistic regression and several deep neural network experiments. Extending this line further, we develop a novel random matrix theory based damping learner for second order optimiser inspired by linear shrinkage estimation. We experimentally demonstrate our learner to be very insensitive to the initialised value and to allow for extremely fast convergence in conjunction with continued stable training and competitive generalisation.

preprint2020arXiv

Deep Curvature Suite

We present MLRG Deep Curvature suite, a PyTorch-based, open-source package for analysis and visualisation of neural network curvature and loss landscape. Despite of providing rich information into properties of neural network and useful for a various designed tasks, curvature information is still not made sufficient use for various reasons, and our method aims to bridge this gap. We present a primer, including its main practical desiderata and common misconceptions, of \textit{Lanczos algorithm}, the theoretical backbone of our package, and present a series of examples based on synthetic toy examples and realistic modern neural networks tested on CIFAR datasets, and show the superiority of our package against existing competing approaches for the similar purposes.

preprint2020arXiv

Flatness is a False Friend

Hessian based measures of flatness, such as the trace, Frobenius and spectral norms, have been argued, used and shown to relate to generalisation. In this paper we demonstrate that for feed forward neural networks under the cross entropy loss, we would expect low loss solutions with large weights to have small Hessian based measures of flatness. This implies that solutions obtained using $L2$ regularisation should in principle be sharper than those without, despite generalising better. We show this to be true for logistic regression, multi-layer perceptrons, simple convolutional, pre-activated and wide residual networks on the MNIST and CIFAR-$100$ datasets. Furthermore, we show that for adaptive optimisation algorithms using iterate averaging, on the VGG-$16$ network and CIFAR-$100$ dataset, achieve superior generalisation to SGD but are $30 \times$ sharper. This theoretical finding, along with experimental results, raises serious questions about the validity of Hessian based sharpness measures in the discussion of generalisation. We further show that the Hessian rank can be bounded by the a constant times number of neurons multiplied by the number of classes, which in practice is often a small fraction of the network parameters. This explains the curious observation that many Hessian eigenvalues are either zero or very near zero which has been reported in the literature.