BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Dennis Prangle

Dennis Prangle appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
ComputationMethodologyMachine LearningApplicationsmath.STStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Optimality Criteria for Probabilistic Numerical Methods

It is well understood that Bayesian decision theory and average case analysis are essentially identical. However, if one is interested in performing uncertainty quantification for a numerical task, it can be argued that standard approaches from the decision-theoretic framework are neither appropriate nor sufficient. Instead, we consider a particular optimality criterion from Bayesian experimental design and study its implied optimal information in the numerical context. This information is demonstrated to differ, in general, from the information that would be used in an average-case-optimal numerical method. The explicit connection to Bayesian experimental design suggests several distinct regimes in which optimal probabilistic numerical methods can be developed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Adapting the ABC distance function

Approximate Bayesian computation performs approximate inference for models where likelihood computations are expensive or impossible. Instead simulations from the model are performed for various parameter values and accepted if they are close enough to the observations. There has been much progress on deciding which summary statistics of the data should be used to judge closeness, but less work on how to weight them. Typically weights are chosen at the start of the algorithm which normalise the summary statistics to vary on similar scales. However these may not be appropriate in iterative ABC algorithms, where the distribution from which the parameters are proposed is updated. This can substantially alter the resulting distribution of summary statistics, so that different weights are needed for normalisation. This paper presents two iterative ABC algorithms which adaptively update their weights and demonstrates improved results on test applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Lazier ABC

ABC algorithms involve a large number of simulations from the model of interest, which can be very computationally costly. This paper summarises the lazy ABC algorithm of Prangle (2015), which reduces the computational demand by abandoning many unpromising simulations before completion. By using a random stopping decision and reweighting the output sample appropriately, the target distribution is the same as for standard ABC. Lazy ABC is also extended here to the case of non-uniform ABC kernels, which is shown to simplify the process of tuning the algorithm effectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Summary Statistics in Approximate Bayesian Computation

This document is due to appear as a chapter of the forthcoming Handbook of Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) edited by S. Sisson, Y. Fan, and M. Beaumont. Since the earliest work on ABC, it has been recognised that using summary statistics is essential to produce useful inference results. This is because ABC suffers from a curse of dimensionality effect, whereby using high dimensional inputs causes large approximation errors in the output. It is therefore crucial to find low dimensional summaries which are informative about the parameter inference or model choice task at hand. This chapter reviews the methods which have been proposed to select such summaries, extending the previous review paper of Blum et al. (2013) with recent developments. Related theoretical results on the ABC curse of dimensionality and sufficiency are also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Lazy ABC

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) performs statistical inference for otherwise intractable probability models by accepting parameter proposals when corresponding simulated datasets are sufficiently close to the observations. Producing the large quantity of simulations needed requires considerable computing time. However, it is often clear before a simulation ends that it is unpromising: it is likely to produce a poor match or require excessive time. This paper proposes lazy ABC, an ABC importance sampling algorithm which saves time by sometimes abandoning such simulations. This makes ABC more scalable to applications where simulation is expensive. By using a random stopping rule and appropriate reweighting step, the target distribution is unchanged from that of standard ABC. Theory and practical methods to tune lazy ABC are presented and illustrated on a simple epidemic model example. They are also demonstrated on the computationally demanding spatial extremes application of Erhardt and Smith (2012), producing efficiency gains, in terms of effective sample size per unit CPU time, of roughly 3 times for a 20 location dataset, and 8 times for 35 locations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Semi-automatic selection of summary statistics for ABC model choice

A central statistical goal is to choose between alternative explanatory models of data. In many modern applications, such as population genetics, it is not possible to apply standard methods based on evaluating the likelihood functions of the models, as these are numerically intractable. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a commonly used alternative for such situations. ABC simulates data x for many parameter values under each model, which is compared to the observed data xobs. More weight is placed on models under which S(x) is close to S(xobs), where S maps data to a vector of summary statistics. Previous work has shown the choice of S is crucial to the efficiency and accuracy of ABC. This paper provides a method to select good summary statistics for model choice. It uses a preliminary step, simulating many x values from all models and fitting regressions to this with the model as response. The resulting model weight estimators are used as S in an ABC analysis. Theoretical results are given to justify this as approximating low dimensional sufficient statistics. A substantive application is presented: choosing between competing coalescent models of demographic growth for Campylobacter jejuni in New Zealand using multi-locus sequence typing data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Constructing Summary Statistics for Approximate Bayesian Computation: Semi-automatic ABC

Many modern statistical applications involve inference for complex stochastic models, where it is easy to simulate from the models, but impossible to calculate likelihoods. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a method of inference for such models. It replaces calculation of the likelihood by a step which involves simulating artificial data for different parameter values, and comparing summary statistics of the simulated data to summary statistics of the observed data. Here we show how to construct appropriate summary statistics for ABC in a semi-automatic manner. We aim for summary statistics which will enable inference about certain parameters of interest to be as accurate as possible. Theoretical results show that optimal summary statistics are the posterior means of the parameters. While these cannot be calculated analytically, we use an extra stage of simulation to estimate how the posterior means vary as a function of the data; and then use these estimates of our summary statistics within ABC. Empirical results show that our approach is a robust method for choosing summary statistics, that can result in substantially more accurate ABC analyses than the ad-hoc choices of summary statistics proposed in the literature. We also demonstrate advantages over two alternative methods of simulation-based inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access