Source author record

Deepak

Deepak appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Abundance analyses of Li-enriched and normal giants in the GALAH survey

Compositions of lithium-enriched and normal giants among the GALAH survey are compared. Except for Li, the only detectable abundance difference between lithium-enriched and normal giants among the investigated elements from carbon to europium occurs for carbon. Among Li-rich giants with A(Li) = 1.8 to 3.1, the C deficiency is very similar to that reported for the normal giants (with A(Li) $<$ 1.8) where the slight C deficiency arises from the first dredge-up. Carbon is slightly under abundant relative to normal giants among the super Li-rich giants where the Li abundance exceeds A(Li) = 3.2. The C abundance as well as the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratios from the literature suggest that addition of Li to create a Li-rich giant may occur independently of the abundance changes wrought by the first dredge-up. Creation of a super Li-rich giant, however, appears to occur with additional CN-cycle conversion of C to N. The probability of becoming a Li-rich giant is approximately independent of a star's mass, although the majority of the Li-rich giants are found to be low mass ($M \leq$ 2 M$_\odot$). The frequency of occurrence of Li-enriched giants among normal giants is about one percent and slightly dependent on metallicity ([Fe/H]). Li-enriched and normal giants are found to have similar projected rotational velocity which suggest that Li-enrichment in giants is not linked to scenarios such as mergers and tidal interaction between binary stars.

preprint2016arXiv

Can the structure of amorphous indium gallium zinc oxide be described in terms of a few polyhedral motifs?

The coordination polyhedra around the cations are the building blocks of ionic solids. In context of amorphous InGaZn oxide (a-IGZO), even though the coordination polyhedra are irregularly arranged, it will be beneficial to identify them. In this work, we address the questions, (a) is it possible to classify all the polyhedra that occur in a-IGZO into only a few distinct groups? and (b) are these the same polyhedral motifs as those observed in the crystalline indium gallium zinc oxide (c-IGZO) or other related crystalline oxides of indium, gallium and zinc? Therefore, in this first principles based study, a large number (ten) of equivalent samples of a-IGZO were prepared by ab initio melt-and-quench molecular dynamics, so that several distinct samples of the amorphous landscape are obtained. The combination of all these structures thus obtained is a better representation of a real a-IGZO sample. For the ten samples containing 360 cations, we propose a simpler and more accurate method for determining the coordination number of each polyhedron, which was verified by charge density plots. Based on a method of comparing bond angles between metal and oxygen atoms, the identified polyhedra were matched to the polyhedral motifs present in the related crystalline systems, such as, InGaZnO4, In2O3, Ga2O3 and ZnO. We find, the a-IGZO primarily consists of the following polyhedra: a tetrahedron from space group 199 and an octahedron from space group 206 of In2O3; a tetrahedron from space group 12 and an octahedron from space group 167 of Ga2O3; a tetrahedron from space group 186 of ZnO; zinc and gallium trigonal bipyramids from c-IGZO; and one zinc 4-fold, one zinc 5-fold and one indium 5-fold coordination polyhedra that occur only in the amorphous phase. We are able to reduce the description of structure from 360 to 10 groups of polyhedra. The benefits of this identification could be enormous.