Paper detail

Abundance analyses of Li-enriched and normal giants in the GALAH survey

Compositions of lithium-enriched and normal giants among the GALAH survey are compared. Except for Li, the only detectable abundance difference between lithium-enriched and normal giants among the investigated elements from carbon to europium occurs for carbon. Among Li-rich giants with A(Li) = 1.8 to 3.1, the C deficiency is very similar to that reported for the normal giants (with A(Li) $<$ 1.8) where the slight C deficiency arises from the first dredge-up. Carbon is slightly under abundant relative to normal giants among the super Li-rich giants where the Li abundance exceeds A(Li) = 3.2. The C abundance as well as the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratios from the literature suggest that addition of Li to create a Li-rich giant may occur independently of the abundance changes wrought by the first dredge-up. Creation of a super Li-rich giant, however, appears to occur with additional CN-cycle conversion of C to N. The probability of becoming a Li-rich giant is approximately independent of a star's mass, although the majority of the Li-rich giants are found to be low mass ($M \leq$ 2 M$_\odot$). The frequency of occurrence of Li-enriched giants among normal giants is about one percent and slightly dependent on metallicity ([Fe/H]). Li-enriched and normal giants are found to have similar projected rotational velocity which suggest that Li-enrichment in giants is not linked to scenarios such as mergers and tidal interaction between binary stars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.