BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Debmalya Panigrahi

Debmalya Panigrahi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsMachine LearningDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingDatabasesDiscrete Mathematics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

23works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

23 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Near-Linear Time Approximations for Cut Problems via Fair Cuts

We introduce the notion of {\em fair cuts} as an approach to leverage approximate $(s,t)$-mincut (equivalently $(s,t)$-maxflow) algorithms in undirected graphs to obtain near-linear time approximation algorithms for several cut problems. Informally, for any $α\geq 1$, an $α$-fair $(s,t)$-cut is an $(s,t)$-cut such that there exists an $(s,t)$-flow that uses $1/α$ fraction of the capacity of \emph{every} edge in the cut. (So, any $α$-fair cut is also an $α$-approximate mincut, but not vice-versa.) We give an algorithm for $(1+ε)$-fair $(s,t)$-cut in $\tilde{O}(m)$-time, thereby matching the best runtime for $(1+ε)$-approximate $(s,t)$-mincut [Peng, SODA '16]. We then demonstrate the power of this approach by showing that this result almost immediately leads to several applications: - the first nearly-linear time $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm that computes all-pairs maxflow values (by constructing an approximate Gomory-Hu tree). Prior to our work, such a result was not known even for the special case of Steiner mincut [Dinitz and Vainstein, STOC '94; Cole and Hariharan, STOC '03]; - the first almost-linear-work subpolynomial-depth parallel algorithms for computing $(1+ε)$-approximations for all-pairs maxflow values (again via an approximate Gomory-Hu tree) in unweighted graphs; - the first near-linear time expander decomposition algorithm that works even when the expansion parameter is polynomially small; this subsumes previous incomparable algorithms [Nanongkai and Saranurak, FOCS '17; Wulff-Nilsen, FOCS '17; Saranurak and Wang, SODA '19].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Regression Approach to Learning-Augmented Online Algorithms

The emerging field of learning-augmented online algorithms uses ML techniques to predict future input parameters and thereby improve the performance of online algorithms. Since these parameters are, in general, real-valued functions, a natural approach is to use regression techniques to make these predictions. We introduce this approach in this paper, and explore it in the context of a general online search framework that captures classic problems like (generalized) ski rental, bin packing, minimum makespan scheduling, etc. We show nearly tight bounds on the sample complexity of this regression problem, and extend our results to the agnostic setting. From a technical standpoint, we show that the key is to incorporate online optimization benchmarks in the design of the loss function for the regression problem, thereby diverging from the use of off-the-shelf regression tools with standard bounds on statistical error.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Breaking the Cubic Barrier for All-Pairs Max-Flow: Gomory-Hu Tree in Nearly Quadratic Time

In 1961, Gomory and Hu showed that the All-Pairs Max-Flow problem of computing the max-flow between all $n\choose 2$ pairs of vertices in an undirected graph can be solved using only $n-1$ calls to any (single-pair) max-flow algorithm. Even assuming a linear-time max-flow algorithm, this yields a running time of $O(mn)$, which is $O(n^3)$ when $m = Θ(n^2)$. While subsequent work has improved this bound for various special graph classes, no subcubic-time algorithm has been obtained in the last 60 years for general graphs. We break this longstanding barrier by giving an $\tilde{O}(n^{2})$-time algorithm on general, weighted graphs. Combined with a popular complexity assumption, we establish a counter-intuitive separation: all-pairs max-flows are strictly easier to compute than all-pairs shortest-paths. Our algorithm produces a cut-equivalent tree, known as the Gomory-Hu tree, from which the max-flow value for any pair can be retrieved in near-constant time. For unweighted graphs, we refine our techniques further to produce a Gomory-Hu tree in the time of a poly-logarithmic number of calls to any max-flow algorithm. This shows an equivalence between the all-pairs and single-pair max-flow problems, and is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors. Using the recently announced $m^{1+o(1)}$-time max-flow algorithm (Chen et al., March 2022), our Gomory-Hu tree algorithm for unweighted graphs also runs in $m^{1+o(1)}$-time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Customizing ML Predictions for Online Algorithms

A popular line of recent research incorporates ML advice in the design of online algorithms to improve their performance in typical instances. These papers treat the ML algorithm as a black-box, and redesign online algorithms to take advantage of ML predictions. In this paper, we ask the complementary question: can we redesign ML algorithms to provide better predictions for online algorithms? We explore this question in the context of the classic rent-or-buy problem, and show that incorporating optimization benchmarks in ML loss functions leads to significantly better performance, while maintaining a worst-case adversarial result when the advice is completely wrong. We support this finding both through theoretical bounds and numerical simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Deterministic Min-cut in Poly-logarithmic Max-flows

We give a deterministic algorithm for finding the minimum (weight) cut of an undirected graph on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges using $\text{polylog}(n)$ calls to any maximum flow subroutine. Using the current best deterministic maximum flow algorithms, this yields an overall running time of $\tilde O(m \cdot \min(\sqrt{m}, n^{2/3}))$ for weighted graphs, and $m^{4/3+o(1)}$ for unweighted (multi)-graphs. This marks the first improvement for this problem since a running time bound of $\tilde O(mn)$ was established by several papers in the early 1990s. Our global minimum cut algorithm is obtained as a corollary of a minimum Steiner cut algorithm, where a minimum Steiner cut is a minimum (weight) set of edges whose removal disconnects at least one pair of vertices among a designated set of terminal vertices. The running time of our deterministic minimum Steiner cut algorithm matches that of the global minimum cut algorithm stated above. Using randomization, the running time improves to $m^{1+o(1)}$ because of a faster maximum flow subroutine; this improves the best known randomized algorithm for the minimum Steiner cut problem as well. Our main technical contribution is a new tool that we call *isolating cuts*. Given a set of vertices $R$, this entails finding cuts of minimum weight that separate (or isolate) each individual vertex $v\in R$ from the rest of the vertices $R\setminus \{v\}$. Naïvely, this can be done using $|R|$ maximum flow calls, but we show that just $O(\log |R|)$ suffice for finding isolating cuts for any set of vertices $R$. We call this the *isolating cut lemma*.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Online Algorithms with Multiple Predictions

This paper studies online algorithms augmented with multiple machine-learned predictions. While online algorithms augmented with a single prediction have been extensively studied in recent years, the literature for the multiple predictions setting is sparse. In this paper, we give a generic algorithmic framework for online covering problems with multiple predictions that obtains an online solution that is competitive against the performance of the best predictor. Our algorithm incorporates the use of predictions in the classic potential-based analysis of online algorithms. We apply our algorithmic framework to solve classical problems such as online set cover, (weighted) caching, and online facility location in the multiple predictions setting. Our algorithm can also be robustified, i.e., the algorithm can be simultaneously made competitive against the best prediction and the performance of the best online algorithm (without prediction).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Caching with Time Windows and Delays

We consider two generalizations of the classical weighted paging problem that incorporate the notion of delayed service of page requests. The first is the (weighted) Paging with Time Windows (PageTW) problem, which is like the classical weighted paging problem except that each page request only needs to be served before a given deadline. This problem arises in many practical applications of online caching, such as the "deadline" I/O scheduler in the Linux kernel and video-on-demand streaming. The second, and more general, problem is the (weighted) Paging with Delay (PageD) problem, where the delay in serving a page request results in a penalty being assessed to the objective. This problem generalizes the caching problem to allow delayed service, a line of work that has recently gained traction in online algorithms (e.g., Emek et al. STOC '16, Azar et al. STOC '17, Azar and Touitou FOCS '19). We give $O(\log k\log n)$-competitive algorithms for both the PageTW and PageD problems on $n$ pages with a cache of size $k$. This significantly improves on the previous best bounds of $O(k)$ for both problems (Azar et al. STOC '17). We also consider the offline PageTW and PageD problems, for which we give $O(1)$ approximation algorithms and prove APX-hardness. These are the first results for the offline problems; even NP-hardness was not known before our work. At the heart of our algorithms is a novel "hitting-set" LP relaxation of the PageTW problem that overcomes the $Ω(k)$ integrality gap of the natural LP for the problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of an LP-based algorithm for an online algorithm with delays/deadlines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Algorithms for Weighted Paging with Predictions

In this paper, we initiate the study of the weighted paging problem with predictions. This continues the recent line of work in online algorithms with predictions, particularly that of Lykouris and Vassilvitski (ICML 2018) and Rohatgi (SODA 2020) on unweighted paging with predictions. We show that unlike unweighted paging, neither a fixed lookahead nor knowledge of the next request for every page is sufficient information for an algorithm to overcome existing lower bounds in weighted paging. However, a combination of the two, which we call the strong per request prediction (SPRP) model, suffices to give a 2-competitive algorithm. We also explore the question of gracefully degrading algorithms with increasing prediction error, and give both upper and lower bounds for a set of natural measures of prediction error.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Algorithms for TSP and Steiner Tree

Robust optimization is a widely studied area in operations research, where the algorithm takes as input a range of values and outputs a single solution that performs well for the entire range. Specifically, a robust algorithm aims to minimize regret, defined as the maximum difference between the solution's cost and that of an optimal solution in hindsight once the input has been realized. For graph problems in P, such as shortest path and minimum spanning tree, robust polynomial-time algorithms that obtain a constant approximation on regret are known. In this paper, we study robust algorithms for minimizing regret in NP-hard graph optimization problems, and give constant approximations on regret for the classical traveling salesman and Steiner tree problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the Price of Stability of Undirected Multicast Games

In multicast network design games, a set of agents choose paths from their source locations to a common sink with the goal of minimizing their individual costs, where the cost of an edge is divided equally among the agents using it. Since the work of Anshelevich et al. (FOCS 2004) that introduced network design games, the main open problem in this field has been the price of stability (PoS) of multicast games. For the special case of broadcast games (every vertex is a terminal, i.e., has an agent), a series of works has culminated in a constant upper bound on the PoS (Bilo` et al., FOCS 2013). However, no significantly sub-logarithmic bound is known for multicast games. In this paper, we make progress toward resolving this question by showing a constant upper bound on the PoS of multicast games for quasi-bipartite graphs. These are graphs where all edges are between two terminals (as in broadcast games) or between a terminal and a nonterminal, but there is no edge between nonterminals. This represents a natural class of intermediate generality between broadcast and multicast games. In addition to the result itself, our techniques overcome some of the fundamental difficulties of analyzing the PoS of general multicast games, and are a promising step toward resolving this major open problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Online and Dynamic Algorithms for Set Cover

In this paper, we study the set cover problem in the fully dynamic model. In this model, the set of active elements, i.e., those that must be covered at any given time, can change due to element arrivals and departures. The goal is to maintain an algorithmic solution that is competitive with respect to the current optimal solution. This model is popular in both the dynamic algorithms and online algorithms communities. The difference is in the restriction placed on the algorithm: in dynamic algorithms, the running time of the algorithm making updates (called update time) is bounded, while in online algorithms, the number of updates made to the solution (called recourse) is limited. In this paper we show the following results: In the update time setting, we obtain O(log n)-competitiveness with O(f log n) amortized update time, and O(f^3)-competitiveness with O(f^2) update time. The O(log n)-competitive algorithm is the first one to achieve a competitive ratio independent of f in this setting. In the recourse setting, we show a competitive ratio of O(min{log n,f}) with constant amortized recourse. Note that this matches the best offline bounds with just constant recourse, something that is impossible in the classical online model. Our results are based on two algorithmic frameworks in the fully-dynamic model that are inspired by the classic greedy and primal-dual algorithms for offline set cover. We show that both frameworks can be used for obtaining both recourse and update time bounds, thereby demonstrating algorithmic techniques common to these strands of research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Online Budgeted Allocation with General Budgets

We study the online budgeted allocation (also called ADWORDS) problem, where a set of impressions arriving online are allocated to a set of budget-constrained advertisers to maximize revenue. Motivated by connections to Internet advertising, several variants of this problem have been studied since the seminal work of Mehta, Saberi, Vazirani, and Vazirani (FOCS 2005). However, this entire body of work focuses on a single budget for every advertising campaign, whereas in order to fully represent the actual agenda of an advertiser, an advertising budget should be expressible over multiple tiers of user-attribute granularity. A simple example is an advertising campaign that is constrained by an overall budget but is also accompanied by a set of sub-budgets for each target demographic. In such a contract scheme, an advertiser can specify their true user-targeting goals, allowing the publisher to fulfill them through relevant allocations. In this paper, we give a complete characterization of the ADWORDS problem for general advertising budgets. In the most general setting, we show that, unlike in the single-budget ADWORDS problem, obtaining a constant competitive ratio is impossible and give asymptotically tight upper and lower bounds. However for our main result, we observe that in many real-world scenarios (as in the above example), multi-tier budgets have a laminar structure, since most relevant consumer or product classifications are hierarchical. For laminar budgets, we obtain a competitive ratio of e/(e-1) in the small bids case, which matches the best known ADWORDS result for single budgets. Our algorithm has a primal-dual structure and generalizes the primal-dual analysis for single- budget ADWORDS first given by Buchbinder, Jain, and Naor (ESA 2007).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Timing Matters: Online Dynamics in Broadcast Games

A central question in algorithmic game theory is to measure the inefficiency (ratio of costs) of Nash equilibria (NE) with respect to socially optimal solutions. The two established metrics used for this purpose are price of anarchy (POA) and price of stability (POS), which respectively provide upper and lower bounds on this ratio. A deficiency of these metrics, however, is that they are purely existential and shed no light on which of the equilibrium states are reachable in an actual game, i.e., via natural game dynamics. This is particularly striking if these metrics differ significantly, such as in network design games where the exponential gap between the best and worst NE states originally prompted the notion of POS in game theory (Anshelevich et al., FOCS 2002). In this paper, we make progress toward bridging this gap by studying network design games under natural game dynamics. First we show that in a completely decentralized setting, where agents arrive, depart, and make improving moves in an arbitrary order, the inefficiency of NE attained can be polynomially large. This implies that the game designer must have some control over the interleaving of these events in order to force the game to attain efficient NE. We complement our negative result by showing that if the game designer is allowed to execute a sequence of improving moves to create an equilibrium state after every batch of agent arrivals or departures, then the resulting equilibrium states attained by the game are exponentially more efficient, i.e., the ratio of costs compared to the optimum is only logarithmic. Overall, our two results establish that in network games, the efficiency of equilibrium states is dictated by whether agents are allowed to join or leave the game in arbitrary states, an observation that might be useful in analyzing the dynamics of other classes of games with divergent POS and POA bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Online Buy-at-Bulk Network Design

We present the first non-trivial online algorithms for the non-uniform, multicommodity buy-at-bulk (MC-BB) network design problem in undirected and directed graphs. Our competitive ratios qualitatively match the best known approximation factors for the corresponding offline problems. The main engine for our results is an online reduction theorem of MC-BB problems to their single-sink (SS-BB) counterparts. We use the concept of junction-tree solutions (Chekuri et al., FOCS 2006) that play an important role in solving the offline versions of the problem via a greedy subroutine -- an inherently offline procedure. Our main technical contribution is in designing an online algorithm using only the existence of good junction-trees to reduce an MC-BB instance to multiple SS-BB sub-instances. Along the way, we also give the first non-trivial online node-weighted/directed single-sink buy-at-bulk algorithms. In addition to the new results, our generic reduction also yields new proofs of recent results for the online node-weighted Steiner forest and online group Steiner forest problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Tight Bounds for Online Vector Scheduling

Modern data centers face a key challenge of effectively serving user requests that arrive online. Such requests are inherently multi-dimensional and characterized by demand vectors over multiple resources such as processor cycles, storage space, and network bandwidth. Typically, different resources require different objectives to be optimized, and $L_r$ norms of loads are among the most popular objectives considered. To address these problems, we consider the online vector scheduling problem in this paper. Introduced by Chekuri and Khanna (SIAM J of Comp. 2006), vector scheduling is a generalization of classical load balancing, where every job has a vector load instead of a scalar load. In this paper, we resolve the online complexity of the vector scheduling problem and its important generalizations. Our main results are: -For identical machines, we show that the optimal competitive ratio is $Θ(\log d / \log \log d)$ by giving an online lower bound and an algorithm with an asymptotically matching competitive ratio. The lower bound is technically challenging, and is obtained via an online lower bound for the minimum mono-chromatic clique problem using a novel online coloring game and randomized coding scheme. -For unrelated machines, we show that the optimal competitive ratio is $Θ(\log m + \log d)$ by giving an online lower bound that matches a previously known upper bound. Unlike identical machines, however, extending these results, particularly the upper bound, to general $L_r$ norms requires new ideas. In particular, we use a carefully constructed potential function that balances the individual $L_r$ objectives with the overall (convexified) min-max objective to guide the online algorithm and track the changes in potential to bound the competitive ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Online Algorithms for Machine Minimization

In this paper, we consider the online version of the machine minimization problem (introduced by Chuzhoy et al., FOCS 2004), where the goal is to schedule a set of jobs with release times, deadlines, and processing lengths on a minimum number of identical machines. Since the online problem has strong lower bounds if all the job parameters are arbitrary, we focus on jobs with uniform length. Our main result is a complete resolution of the deterministic complexity of this problem by showing that a competitive ratio of $e$ is achievable and optimal, thereby improving upon existing lower and upper bounds of 2.09 and 5.2 respectively. We also give a constant-competitive online algorithm for the case of uniform deadlines (but arbitrary job lengths); to the best of our knowledge, no such algorithm was known previously. Finally, we consider the complimentary problem of throughput maximization where the goal is to maximize the sum of weights of scheduled jobs on a fixed set of identical machines (introduced by Bar-Noy et al. STOC 1999). We give a randomized online algorithm for this problem with a competitive ratio of e/e-1; previous results achieved this bound only for the case of a single machine or in the limit of an infinite number of machines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Online Covering with Convex Objectives and Applications

We give an algorithmic framework for minimizing general convex objectives (that are differentiable and monotone non-decreasing) over a set of covering constraints that arrive online. This substantially extends previous work on online covering for linear objectives (Alon {\em et al.}, STOC 2003) and online covering with offline packing constraints (Azar {\em et al.}, SODA 2013). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result in online optimization for generic non-linear objectives; special cases of such objectives have previously been considered, particularly for energy minimization. As a specific problem in this genre, we consider the unrelated machine scheduling problem with startup costs and arbitrary $\ell_p$ norms on machine loads (including the surprisingly non-trivial $\ell_1$ norm representing total machine load). This problem was studied earlier for the makespan norm in both the offline (Khuller~{\em et al.}, SODA 2010; Li and Khuller, SODA 2011) and online settings (Azar {\em et al.}, SODA 2013). We adapt the two-phase approach of obtaining a fractional solution and then rounding it online (used successfully to many linear objectives) to the non-linear objective. The fractional algorithm uses ideas from our general framework that we described above (but does not fit the framework exactly because of non-positive entries in the constraint matrix). The rounding algorithm uses ideas from offline rounding of LPs with non-linear objectives (Azar and Epstein, STOC 2005; Kumar {\em et al.}, FOCS 2005). Our competitive ratio is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Finally, for the important special case of total load ($\ell_1$ norm), we give a different rounding algorithm that obtains a better competitive ratio than the generic rounding algorithm for $\ell_p$ norms. We show that this competitive ratio is asymptotically tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Precedence-constrained Scheduling of Malleable Jobs with Preemption

Scheduling jobs with precedence constraints on a set of identical machines to minimize the total processing time (makespan) is a fundamental problem in combinatorial optimization. In practical settings such as cloud computing, jobs are often malleable, i.e., can be processed on multiple machines simultaneously. The instantaneous processing rate of a job is a non-decreasing function of the number of machines assigned to it (we call it the processing function). Previous research has focused on practically relevant concave processing functions, which obey the law of diminishing utility and generalize the classical (non-malleable) problem. Our main result is a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm for concave processing functions (for any $ε> 0$), which is the best possible under complexity theoretic assumptions. The approximation ratio improves to $(1 + ε)$ for the interesting and practically relevant special case of power functions, i.e., $p_j(z) = c_j \cdot z^γ$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Online Load Balancing on Unrelated Machines with Startup Costs

Motivated by applications in energy-efficient scheduling in data centers, Khuller, Li, and Saha introduced the {\em machine activation} problem as a generalization of the classical optimization problems of set cover and load balancing on unrelated machines. In this problem, a set of $n$ jobs have to be distributed among a set of $m$ (unrelated) machines, given the processing time of each job on each machine, where each machine has a startup cost. The goal is to produce a schedule of minimum total startup cost subject to a constraint $\bf L$ on its makespan. While Khuller {\em et al} considered the offline version of this problem, a typical scenario in scheduling is one where jobs arrive online and have to be assigned to a machine immediately on arrival. We give an $(O(\log (mn)\log m), O(\log m))$-competitive randomized online algorithm for this problem, i.e. the schedule produced by our algorithm has a makespan of $O({\bf L} \log m)$ with high probability, and a total expected startup cost of $O(\log (mn)\log m)$ times that of an optimal offline schedule with makespan $\bf L$. The competitive ratios of our algorithm are (almost) optimal. Our algorithms use the online primal dual framework introduced by Alon {\em et al} for the online set cover problem, and subsequently developed further by Buchbinder, Naor, and co-authors. To the best of our knowledge, all previous applications of this framework have been to linear programs (LPs) with either packing or covering constraints. One novelty of our application is that we use this framework for a mixed LP that has both covering and packing constraints. We hope that the algorithmic techniques developed in this paper to simultaneously handle packing and covering constraints will be useful for solving other online optimization problems as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Provenance Views for Module Privacy

Scientific workflow systems increasingly store provenance information about the module executions used to produce a data item, as well as the parameter settings and intermediate data items passed between module executions. However, authors/owners of workflows may wish to keep some of this information confidential. In particular, a module may be proprietary, and users should not be able to infer its behavior by seeing mappings between all data inputs and outputs. The problem we address in this paper is the following: Given a workflow, abstractly modeled by a relation R, a privacy requirement Γand costs associated with data. The owner of the workflow decides which data (attributes) to hide, and provides the user with a view R' which is the projection of R over attributes which have not been hidden. The goal is to minimize the cost of hidden data while guaranteeing that individual modules are Γ-private. We call this the "secureview" problem. We formally define the problem, study its complexity, and offer algorithmic solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A General Framework for Graph Sparsification

Given a weighted graph $G$ and an error parameter $ε> 0$, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in $G$ and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph $G_ε$ (containing O(n\log n) edges in expectation) with the following property: the weight of every cut in $G_ε$ is within a factor of $(1\pm ε)$ of the weight of the corresponding cut in $G$. We provide a generic framework that sets out sufficient conditions for any particular sampling scheme to result in good sparsifiers, and obtain a set of results by simple instantiations of this framework. The results we obtain include the following: (1) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m + n\log^4 n) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (2) We improve the time complexity of graph sparsification from O(m\log^3 n) to O(m\log^2 n) for graphs with arbitrary edge weights. (3) If the size of the sparsifier is allowed to be O(n\log^2 n/ε^2) instead of O(n\log n/ε^2), we improve the time complexity of sparsification to O(m) for graphs with polynomial edge weights. (4) We show that sampling using standard connectivities results in good sparsifiers, thus resolving an open question of Benczur and Karger. As a corollary, we give a simple proof of (a slightly weaker version of) a result due to Spielman and Srivastava showing that sampling using effective resistances produces good sparsifiers. (5) We give a simple proof showing that sampling using strong connectivities results in good sparsifiers, a result obtained previously using a more involved proof by Benczur and Karger. A key ingredient of our proofs is a generalization of bounds on the number of small cuts in an undirected graph due to Karger; this generalization might be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Linear-time Algorithm for Sparsification of Unweighted Graphs

Given an undirected graph $G$ and an error parameter $ε> 0$, the {\em graph sparsification} problem requires sampling edges in $G$ and giving the sampled edges appropriate weights to obtain a sparse graph $G_ε$ with the following property: the weight of every cut in $G_ε$ is within a factor of $(1\pm ε)$ of the weight of the corresponding cut in $G$. If $G$ is unweighted, an $O(m\log n)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation, and an $O(m)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log^2 n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation have recently been developed (Hariharan-Panigrahi, 2010). In this paper, we improve these results by giving an $O(m)$-time algorithm for constructing $G_ε$ with $O(n\log n/ε^2)$ edges in expectation, for unweighted graphs. Our algorithm is optimal in terms of its time complexity; further, no efficient algorithm is known for constructing a sparser $G_ε$. Our algorithm is Monte-Carlo, i.e. it produces the correct output with high probability, as are all efficient graph sparsification algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access