BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Debashis Chatterjee

Debashis Chatterjee contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodologyComputationhep-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Novel Bayesian Procrustes Variance-based Inferences in Geometric Morphometrics & Novel R package: BPviGM1

Compared to abundant classical statistics-based literature, to date, very little Bayesian literature exists on Procrustes shape analysis in Geometric Morphometrics, probably because of being a relatively new branch of statistical research and because of inherent computational difficulty associated with Bayesian analysis. Moreover, we may obtain a plethora of novel inferences from Bayesian Procrustes analysis of shape parameter distributions. In this paper, we propose to regard the posterior of Procrustes shape variance as morphological variability indicators. Here we propose novel Bayesian methodologies for Procrustes shape analysis based on landmark data's isotropic variance assumption and propose a Bayesian statistical test for model validation of new species discovery using morphological variation reflected in the posterior distribution of landmark-variance of objects studied under Geometric Morphometrics. We will consider Gaussian distribution-based and heavy-tailed t distribution-based models for Procrustes analysis. To date, we are not aware of any direct R package for Bayesian Procrustes analysis for landmark-based Geometric Morphometrics. Hence, we introduce a novel, simple R package \textbf{BPviGM1} ("Bayesian Procrustes Variance-based inferences in Geometric Morphometrics 1"), which essentially contains the R code implementations of the computations for proposed models and methodologies, such as R function for Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) run for drawing samples from posterior of parameters of concern and R function for the proposed Bayesian test of model validation based on significance morphological variation. As an application, we can quantitatively show that primate male-face may be genetically viable to more shape-variation than the same for females.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Bayesian Multiple Testing Paradigm for Model Selection in Inverse Regression Problems

In this article, we propose a novel Bayesian multiple testing formulation for model and variable selection in inverse setups, judiciously embedding the idea of inverse reference distributions proposed by Bhattacharya (2013) in a mixture framework consisting of the competing models. We develop the theory and methods in the general context encompassing parametric and nonparametric competing models, dependent data, as well as misspecifications. Our investigation shows that asymptotically the multiple testing procedure almost surely selects the best possible inverse model that minimizes the minimum Kullback-Leibler divergence from the true model. We also show that the error rates, namely, versions of the false discovery rate and the false non-discovery rate converge to zero almost surely as the sample size goes to infinity. Asymptotic α-control of versions of the false discovery rate and its impact on the convergence of false non-discovery rate versions, are also investigated. Our simulation experiments involve small sample based selection among inverse Poisson log regression and inverse geometric logit and probit regression, where the regressions are either linear or based on Gaussian processes. Additionally, variable selection is also considered. Our multiple testing results turn out to be very encouraging in the sense of selecting the best models in all the non-misspecified and misspecified cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Convergence of Pseudo-Bayes Factors in Forward and Inverse Regression Problems

In the Bayesian literature on model comparison, Bayes factors play the leading role. In the classical statistical literature, model selection criteria are often devised used cross-validation ideas. Amalgamating the ideas of Bayes factor and cross-validation Geisser and Eddy (1979) created the pseudo-Bayes factor. The usage of cross-validation inculcates several theoretical advantages, computational simplicity and numerical stability in Bayes factors as the marginal density of the entire dataset is replaced with products of cross-validation densities of individual data points. However, the popularity of pseudo-Bayes factors is still negligible in comparison with Bayes factors, with respect to both theoretical investigations and practical applications. In this article, we establish almost sure exponential convergence of pseudo-Bayes factors for large samples under a general setup consisting of dependent data and model misspecifications. We particularly focus on general parametric and nonparametric regression setups in both forward and inverse contexts. We illustrate our theoretical results with various examples, providing explicit calculations. We also supplement our asymptotic theory with simulation experiments in small sample situations of Poisson log regression and geometric logit and probit regression, additionally addressing the variable selection problem. We consider both linear and nonparametric regression modeled by Gaussian processes for our purposes. Our simulation results provide quite interesting insights into the usage of pseudo-Bayes factors in forward and inverse setups.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Non-relativistic Reduction of Spinors, New Currents and their Algebra

A specific mapping is introduced to reduce the Dirac action to the non-relativistic (Pauli - Schrödinger) action for spinors. Using this mapping, the structures of the vector and axial vector currents in the non-relativistic theory are obtained. The implications of the relativistic Ward identities in the non-relativistic limit are discussed. A new non-abelian type of current in the Pauli - Schrödinger theory is obtained. As we show, this is essential for the closure of the algebra among the usual currents. The role of parity in the non-relativistic theory is also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Posterior Consistency of Bayesian Inverse Regression and Inverse Reference Distributions

We consider Bayesian inference in inverse regression problems where the objective is to infer about unobserved covariates from observed responses and covariates. We establish posterior consistency of such unobserved covariates in Bayesian inverse regression problemsunder appropriate priors in a leave-one-out cross-validation setup. We relate this to posterior consistency of inverse reference distributions (Bhattacharya (2013)) for assessing model adequacy. We illustrate our theory and methods with various examples of Bayesian inverse regression, along with adequate simulation experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Posterior Convergence of Gaussian and General Stochastic Process Regression Under Possible Misspecifications

In this article, we investigate posterior convergence in nonparametric regression models where the unknown regression function is modeled by some appropriate stochastic process. In this regard, we consider two setups. The first setup is based on Gaussian processes, where the covariates are either random or non-random and the noise may be either normally or double-exponentially distributed. In the second setup, we assume that the underlying regression function is modeled by some reasonably smooth, but unspecified stochastic process satisfying reasonable conditions. The distribution of the noise is also left unspecified, but assumed to be thick-tailed. As in the previous studies regarding the same problems, we do not assume that the truth lies in the postulated parameter space, thus explicitly allowing the possibilities of misspecification. We exploit the general results of Shalizi (2009) for our purpose and establish not only posterior consistency, but also the rates at which the posterior probabilities converge, which turns out to be the Kullback-Leibler divergence rate. We also investigate the more familiar posterior convergence rates. Interestingly, we show that the posterior predictive distribution can accurately approximate the best possible predictive distribution in the sense that the Hellinger distance, as well as the total variation distance between the two distributions can tend to zero, in spite of misspecifications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Posterior Convergence of Nonparametric Binary and Poisson Regression Under Possible Misspecifications

In this article, we investigate posterior convergence of nonparametric binary and Poisson regression under possible model misspecification, assuming general stochastic process prior with appropriate properties. Our model setup and objective for binary regression is similar to that of Ghosal and Roy (2006) where the authors have used the approach of entropy bound and exponentially consistent tests with the sieve method to achieve consistency with respect to their Gaussian process prior. In contrast, for both binary and Poisson regression, using general stochastic process prior, our approach involves verification of asymptotic equipartition property along with the method of sieve, which is a manoeuvre of the general results of Shalizi (2009), useful even for misspecified models. Moreover, we will establish not only posterior consistency but also the rates at which the posterior probabilities converge, which turns out to be the Kullback-Leibler divergence rate. We also investgate the traditional posterior convergence rates. Interestingly, from subjective Bayesian viewpoint we will show that the posterior predictive distribution can accurately approximate the best possible predictive distribution in the sense that the Hellinger distance, as well as the total variation distance between the two distributions can tend to zero, in spite of misspecifications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access