BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

David M. W. Powers

David M. W. Powers appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageComputer VisionMachine LearningInformation RetrievalMethodologyNeurons and CognitionRoboticsSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Modeling and Selection of Interdependent Software Requirements using Fuzzy Graphs

Software requirement selection is to find an optimal set of requirements that gives the highest value for a release of software while keeping the cost within the budget. However, value-related dependencies among software requirements may impact the value of an optimal set. Moreover, value-related dependencies can be of varying strengths. Hence, it is important to consider both the existence and the strengths of value-related dependencies during a requirement selection. The existing selection models however, either assume that software requirements are independent or they ignore strengths of requirement dependencies. This paper presents a cost-value optimization model that considers the impacts of value-related requirement dependencies on the value of selected requirements (optimal set). We have exploited algebraic structure of fuzzy graphs for modeling value-related requirement dependencies and their strengths. Validity and practicality of the work are verified through carrying out several simulations and studying a real world software project.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Prediction of Dashed Café Wall illusion by the Classical Receptive Field Model

The Café Wall illusion is one of a class of tilt illusions where lines that are parallel appear to be tilted. We demonstrate that a simple Differences of Gaussian model provides an explanatory mechanism for the illusory tilt perceived in a family of Café Wall illusion generalizes to the dashed versions of Café Wall. Our explanation models the visual mechanisms in low level stages and the lateral inhibition of simple cells that can reveal tilt cues in Geometrical distortion illusions such as Tile illusions particularly Café Wall illusions. For this, we simulate the activations of the retinal/cortical simple cells in responses to these patterns based on a Classical Receptive Field (CRF) model (referred to as Vis-CRF) to explain tilt effects in these illusions. Previously, it was assumed that all these visual experiences of tilt arise from the orientation selectivity properties described for more complex cortical cells. An estimation of an overall tilt angle perceived in these illusions is based on the integration of the local tilts detected by simple cells which is presumed to be a key mechanism utilized by the complex cells to create our final perception of tilt.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Visualization of Tradeoff in Evaluation: from Precision-Recall & PN to LIFT, ROC & BIRD

Evaluation often aims to reduce the correctness or error characteristics of a system down to a single number, but that always involves trade-offs. Another way of dealing with this is to quote two numbers, such as Recall and Precision, or Sensitivity and Specificity. But it can also be useful to see more than this, and a graphical approach can explore sensitivity to cost, prevalence, bias, noise, parameters and hyper-parameters. Moreover, most techniques are implicitly based on two balanced classes, and our ability to visualize graphically is intrinsically two dimensional, but we often want to visualize in a multiclass context. We review the dichotomous approaches relating to Precision, Recall, and ROC as well as the related LIFT chart, exploring how they handle unbalanced and multiclass data, and deriving new probabilistic and information theoretic variants of LIFT that help deal with the issues associated with the handling of multiple and unbalanced classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A Novel Efficient Task-Assign Route Planning Method for AUV Guidance in a Dynamic Cluttered Environment

Promoting the levels of autonomy facilitates the vehicle in performing long-range operations with minimum supervision. The capability of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) to fulfill the mission objectives is directly influenced by route planning and task assignment system performance. The system fives the error of "Bad character(s) in field Abstract" for no reason. Please refer to manuscript for the full abstract

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A quantitative analysis of tilt in the Café Wall illusion: a bioplausible model for foveal and peripheral vision

The biological characteristics of human visual processing can be investigated through the study of optical illusions and their perception, giving rise to intuitions that may improve computer vision to match human performance. Geometric illusions are a specific subfamily in which orientations and angles are misperceived. This paper reports quantifiable predictions of the degree of tilt for a typical geometric illusion called Café Wall, in which the mortar between the tiles seems to tilt or bow. Our study employs a common bioplausible model of retinal processing and we further develop an analytic processing pipeline to quantify and thus predict the specific angle of tilt. We further study the effect of resolution and feature size in order to predict the different perceived tilts in different areas of the fovea and periphery, where resolution varies as the eye saccades to different parts of the image. In the experiments, several different minimal portions of the pattern, modeling monocular and binocular foveal views, are investigated across multiple scales, in order to quantify tilts with confidence intervals and explore the difference between local and global tilt.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Throwing fuel on the embers: Probability or Dichotomy, Cognitive or Linguistic?

Prof. Robert Berwick's abstract for his forthcoming invited talk at the ACL2016 workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning revives an ancient debate. Entitled "Why take a chance?", Berwick seems to refer implicitly to Chomsky's critique of the statistical approach of Harris as well as the currently dominant paradigms in CoNLL. Berwick avoids Chomsky's use of "innate" but states that "the debate over the existence of sophisticated mental grammars was settled with Chomsky's Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1957/1975)", acknowledging that "this debate has often been revived". This paper agrees with the view that this debate has long since been settled, but with the opposite outcome! Given the embers have not yet died away, and the questions remain fundamental, perhaps it is appropriate to refuel the debate, so I would like to join Bob in throwing fuel on this fire by reviewing the evidence against the Chomskian position!

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Evaluation Evaluation a Monte Carlo study

Over the last decade there has been increasing concern about the biases embodied in traditional evaluation methods for Natural Language Processing/Learning, particularly methods borrowed from Information Retrieval. Without knowledge of the Bias and Prevalence of the contingency being tested, or equivalently the expectation due to chance, the simple conditional probabilities Recall, Precision and Accuracy are not meaningful as evaluation measures, either individually or in combinations such as F-factor. The existence of bias in NLP measures leads to the 'improvement' of systems by increasing their bias, such as the practice of improving tagging and parsing scores by using most common value (e.g. water is always a Noun) rather than the attempting to discover the correct one. The measures Cohen Kappa and Powers Informedness are discussed as unbiased alternative to Recall and related to the psychologically significant measure DeltaP. In this paper we will analyze both biased and unbiased measures theoretically, characterizing the precise relationship between all these measures as well as evaluating the evaluation measures themselves empirically using a Monte Carlo simulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access