BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David J. Stevenson

David J. Stevenson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.EPphysics.ao-phphysics.flu-dyn

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Revelations on Jupiter's Formation, Evolution and Interior: Challenges from Juno Results

The Juno mission has revolutionized and challenged our understanding of Jupiter. As Juno transitioned to its extended mission, we review the major findings of Jupiter's internal structure relevant to understanding Jupiter's formation and evolution. Results from Juno's investigation of Jupiter's interior structure imply that the planet has compositional gradients and is accordingly non-adiabatic, with a complex internal structure. These new results imply that current models of Jupiter's formation and evolution require a revision. In this paper, we discuss potential formation and evolution paths that can lead to an internal structure model consistent with Juno data, and the constraints they provide. We note that standard core accretion formation models, including the heavy-element enrichment during planetary growth is consistent with an interior that is inhomogeneous with composition gradients in its deep interior. However, such formation models typically predict that this region, which could be interpreted as a primordial dilute core, is confined to about 10% of Jupiter's total mass. In contrast, structure models that fit Juno data imply that this region contains 30% of the mass or more. One way to explain the origin of this extended region is by invoking a relatively long (about 2 Myrs) formation phase where the growing planet accretes gas and planetesimals delaying the runaway gas accretion. Alternatively, Jupiter's fuzzy core could be a result of a giant impact or convection post-formation. These novel scenarios require somewhat special and specific conditions. Clarity on the plausibility of such conditions could come from future high-resolution observations of planet-forming regions around other stars, from the observed and modeled architectures of extrasolar systems with giant planets, and future Juno data obtained during its extended mission.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The gravitational imprint of an interior-orbital resonance in Jupiter-Io

At mid-mission perijove 17, NASA's Juno mission has revealed a $7σ$ discrepancy between Jupiter's observed high-degree tidal response and the theoretical equilibrium tidal response, namely the Love number $k_{42}$. Here, we propose an interpretation for this puzzling disagreement based on an interior-orbital resonance between internal gravity waves trapped in Jupiter's dilute core and the orbital motion of Io. We use simple Jupiter models to calculate a fractional correction $Δk_{42}$ to the equilibrium tidal response that comes from the dynamical tidal response of a $g$-mode trapped in Jupiter's dilute core. Our results suggest that an extended dilute core ($r\gtrsim0.7R_J$) produces an interior-orbital resonance with Io that modifies Jupiter's tidal response in $Δk_{42}\sim-11\%$, allowing us to fit Juno's $k_{42}$. In our proposed self-consistent scenario, Jupiter's dilute core evolves in resonant locking with Io's orbital migration, which allows the interior-orbital resonance to persist over geological timescales. This scenario requires a dilute core that becomes smoother or shrinks over time, together with a $_4^2g_1$ mode ($\ell,m,n=4,2,1$) with resonant tidal dissipation reaching $Q_4\sim1000$. Jupiter's dilute core evolution path and the dissipation mechanism for the resonant $_4^2g_1$ mode are uncertain and motivate future analysis. No other alternative exists so far to explain the $7σ$ discrepancy in Juno $k_{42}$. Our proposed interior-orbital resonance can be tested by Juno observations of $k_{42}$ tides raised on Jupiter by Europa as obtained at the end of the extended mission (mid 2025), and by future seismological observations of Jupiter's $_4^2g_1$ mode oscillation frequency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The lost meaning of Jupiter's high-degree Love numbers

NASA's Juno mission recently reported Jupiter's high-degree (degree $\ell$, azimuthal order $m$ $=4,2$) Love number $k_{42}=1.289\pm0.063$ ($1σ$), an order of magnitude above the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ obtained in a nonrotating Jupiter model. After numerically modeling rotation, the hydrostatic $k_{42}=1.743\pm0.002$ is still $7σ$ away from the observation, raising doubts about our understanding of Jupiter's tidal response. Here, we use first-order perturbation theory to explain the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ result analytically. We use a simple Jupiter equation of state ($n=1$ polytrope) to obtain the fractional change in $k_{42}$ when comparing a rotating model with a nonrotating model. Our analytical result shows that the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ is dominated by the tidal response at $\ell=m=2$ coupled into the spherical harmonic $\ell,m=4,2$ by the planet's oblate figure. The $\ell=4$ normalization in $k_{42}$ introduces an orbital factor $(a/s)^2$ into $k_{42}$, where $a$ is the satellite semimajor axis and $s$ is Jupiter's average radius. As a result, different Galilean satellites produce a different $k_{42}$. We conclude that high-degree tesseral Love numbers ($\ell> m$, $m\geq2$) are dominated by lower-degree Love numbers and thus provide little additional information about interior structure, at least when they are primarily hydrostatic. Our results entail important implications for a future interpretation of the currently observed Juno $k_{42}$. After including the coupling from the well-understood $\ell=2$ dynamical tides ($Δk_2 \approx -4\%$), Jupiter's hydrostatic $k_{42}$ requires an unknown dynamical effect to produce a fractional correction $Δk_{42}\approx-11\%$ in order to fit Juno's observation within $3σ$. Future work is required to explain the required $Δk_{42}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Thermodynamically Governed Interior Models of Uranus and Neptune

Interior models of Uranus and Neptune often assume discrete layers, but sharp interfaces are expected only if major constituents are immiscible. Diffuse interfaces could arise if accretion favored a central concentration of the least volatile constituents (also incidentally the most dense); compositional gradients arising in such a structure would likely inhibit convection. Currently, two lines of evidence suggest possible hydrogen-water immiscibility in ice giant interiors. The first arises from crude extrapolation of the experimental hydrogen-water critical curve to $\sim 3$ GPa (Bali et al. 2013). The data are obtained for an impure system containing silicates, though Uranus and Neptune could also be "dirty." Current ab initio models disagree (Soubiran & Militzer 2015), though hydrogen and water are difficult to model from first-principles quantum mechanics with the necessary precision. The second argument for hydrogen-water immiscibility in ice giants, outlined herein, invokes reasoning about the gravitational and magnetic fields. While consensus remains lacking, here we examine the immiscible case. Applying the resulting thermodynamic constraints, we find that Neptune models with envelopes containing a substantial water mole fraction, as much as $χ\gtrsim 0.1$ relative to hydrogen, can satisfy observations. In contrast, Uranus models appear to require $χ\lesssim 0.01$, potentially suggestive of fully demixed hydrogen and water. Enough gravitational potential energy would be available from gradual hydrogen-water demixing, to supply Neptune's present-day heatflow for roughly ten solar system lifetimes. Hydrogen-water demixing could slow Neptune's cooling rate by an order of magnitude; different hydrogen-water demixing states could account for the different heatflows of Uranus and Neptune.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Comparison of the deep atmospheric dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in light of the Juno and Cassini gravity measurements

The nature and structure of the observed east-west flows on Jupiter and Saturn has been one of the longest-lasting mysteries in planetary science. This mystery has been recently unraveled due to the accurate gravity measurements provided by the Juno mission to Jupiter and the Grand Finale of the Cassini mission to Saturn. These two experiments, which coincidentally happened around the same time, allowed determination of the vertical and meridional profiles of the zonal flows on both planets. This paper reviews the topic of zonal jets on the gas giants in light of the new data from these two experiments. The gravity measurements not only allow the depth of the jets to be constrained, yielding the inference that the jets extend roughly 3000 and 9000 km below the observed clouds on Jupiter and Saturn, respectively, but also provide insights into the mechanisms controlling these zonal flows. Specifically, for both planets this depth corresponds to the depth where electrical conductivity is within an order of magnitude of 1 S/m, implying that the magnetic field likely plays a key role in damping the zonal flows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Inflating Hot Jupiters With Ohmic Dissipation

We present a new, magnetohydrodynamic mechanism for inflation of close-in giant extrasolar planets. The idea behind the mechanism is that current, which is induced through interaction of atmospheric winds and the planetary magnetic field, results in significant Ohmic dissipation of energy in the interior. We develop an analytical model for computation of interior Ohmic dissipation, with a simplified treatment of the atmosphere. We apply our model to HD209458b, Tres-4b and HD189733b. With conservative assumptions for wind speed and field strength, our model predicts a generated power that appears to be large enough to maintain the transit radii, opening an unexplored avenue towards solving a decade-old puzzle of extrasolar gas giant radius anomalies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access