Source author record

Benjamin Idini

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

The gravitational imprint of an interior-orbital resonance in Jupiter-Io

At mid-mission perijove 17, NASA's Juno mission has revealed a 7σ7σ discrepancy between Jupiter's observed high-degree tidal response and the theoretical equilibrium tidal response, namely the Love number k42k_{42}. Here, we propose an interpretation for this puzzling disagreement based on an interior-orbital resonance between internal gravity waves trapped in Jupiter's dilute core and the orbital motion of Io. We use simple Jupiter models to calculate a fractional correction Δk42Δk_{42} to the equilibrium tidal response that comes from the dynamical tidal response of a gg-mode trapped in Jupiter's dilute core. Our results suggest that an extended dilute core (r≳0.7RJr\gtrsim0.7R_J) produces an interior-orbital resonance with Io that modifies Jupiter's tidal response in Δk42∼−11%Δk_{42}\sim-11\%, allowing us to fit Juno's k42k_{42}. In our proposed self-consistent scenario, Jupiter's dilute core evolves in resonant locking with Io's orbital migration, which allows the interior-orbital resonance to persist over geological timescales. This scenario requires a dilute core that becomes smoother or shrinks over time, together with a 42g1_4^2g_1 mode (ℓ,m,n=4,2,1\ell,m,n=4,2,1) with resonant tidal dissipation reaching Q4∼1000Q_4\sim1000. Jupiter's dilute core evolution path and the dissipation mechanism for the resonant 42g1_4^2g_1 mode are uncertain and motivate future analysis. No other alternative exists so far to explain the 7σ7σ discrepancy in Juno k42k_{42}. Our proposed interior-orbital resonance can be tested by Juno observations of k42k_{42} tides raised on Jupiter by Europa as obtained at the end of the extended mission (mid 2025), and by future seismological observations of Jupiter's 42g1_4^2g_1 mode oscillation frequency.

preprint2021arXiv

The lost meaning of Jupiter's high-degree Love numbers

NASA's Juno mission recently reported Jupiter's high-degree (degree ℓ\ell, azimuthal order mm =4,2=4,2) Love number k42=1.289±0.063k_{42}=1.289\pm0.063 (1σ1σ), an order of magnitude above the hydrostatic k42k_{42} obtained in a nonrotating Jupiter model. After numerically modeling rotation, the hydrostatic k42=1.743±0.002k_{42}=1.743\pm0.002 is still 7σ7σ away from the observation, raising doubts about our understanding of Jupiter's tidal response. Here, we use first-order perturbation theory to explain the hydrostatic k42k_{42} result analytically. We use a simple Jupiter equation of state (n=1n=1 polytrope) to obtain the fractional change in k42k_{42} when comparing a rotating model with a nonrotating model. Our analytical result shows that the hydrostatic k42k_{42} is dominated by the tidal response at ℓ=m=2\ell=m=2 coupled into the spherical harmonic ℓ,m=4,2\ell,m=4,2 by the planet's oblate figure. The ℓ=4\ell=4 normalization in k42k_{42} introduces an orbital factor (a/s)2(a/s)^2 into k42k_{42}, where aa is the satellite semimajor axis and ss is Jupiter's average radius. As a result, different Galilean satellites produce a different k42k_{42}. We conclude that high-degree tesseral Love numbers (ℓ>m\ell> m, m≥2m\geq2) are dominated by lower-degree Love numbers and thus provide little additional information about interior structure, at least when they are primarily hydrostatic. Our results entail important implications for a future interpretation of the currently observed Juno k42k_{42}. After including the coupling from the well-understood ℓ=2\ell=2 dynamical tides (Δk2≈−4%Δk_2 \approx -4\%), Jupiter's hydrostatic k42k_{42} requires an unknown dynamical effect to produce a fractional correction Δk42≈−11%Δk_{42}\approx-11\% in order to fit Juno's observation within 3σ3σ. Future work is required to explain the required Δk42Δk_{42}.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.