Source author record

Benjamin Idini

Benjamin Idini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph.EP

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

The gravitational imprint of an interior-orbital resonance in Jupiter-Io

At mid-mission perijove 17, NASA's Juno mission has revealed a $7σ$ discrepancy between Jupiter's observed high-degree tidal response and the theoretical equilibrium tidal response, namely the Love number $k_{42}$. Here, we propose an interpretation for this puzzling disagreement based on an interior-orbital resonance between internal gravity waves trapped in Jupiter's dilute core and the orbital motion of Io. We use simple Jupiter models to calculate a fractional correction $Δk_{42}$ to the equilibrium tidal response that comes from the dynamical tidal response of a $g$-mode trapped in Jupiter's dilute core. Our results suggest that an extended dilute core ($r\gtrsim0.7R_J$) produces an interior-orbital resonance with Io that modifies Jupiter's tidal response in $Δk_{42}\sim-11\%$, allowing us to fit Juno's $k_{42}$. In our proposed self-consistent scenario, Jupiter's dilute core evolves in resonant locking with Io's orbital migration, which allows the interior-orbital resonance to persist over geological timescales. This scenario requires a dilute core that becomes smoother or shrinks over time, together with a $_4^2g_1$ mode ($\ell,m,n=4,2,1$) with resonant tidal dissipation reaching $Q_4\sim1000$. Jupiter's dilute core evolution path and the dissipation mechanism for the resonant $_4^2g_1$ mode are uncertain and motivate future analysis. No other alternative exists so far to explain the $7σ$ discrepancy in Juno $k_{42}$. Our proposed interior-orbital resonance can be tested by Juno observations of $k_{42}$ tides raised on Jupiter by Europa as obtained at the end of the extended mission (mid 2025), and by future seismological observations of Jupiter's $_4^2g_1$ mode oscillation frequency.

preprint2021arXiv

The lost meaning of Jupiter's high-degree Love numbers

NASA's Juno mission recently reported Jupiter's high-degree (degree $\ell$, azimuthal order $m$ $=4,2$) Love number $k_{42}=1.289\pm0.063$ ($1σ$), an order of magnitude above the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ obtained in a nonrotating Jupiter model. After numerically modeling rotation, the hydrostatic $k_{42}=1.743\pm0.002$ is still $7σ$ away from the observation, raising doubts about our understanding of Jupiter's tidal response. Here, we use first-order perturbation theory to explain the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ result analytically. We use a simple Jupiter equation of state ($n=1$ polytrope) to obtain the fractional change in $k_{42}$ when comparing a rotating model with a nonrotating model. Our analytical result shows that the hydrostatic $k_{42}$ is dominated by the tidal response at $\ell=m=2$ coupled into the spherical harmonic $\ell,m=4,2$ by the planet's oblate figure. The $\ell=4$ normalization in $k_{42}$ introduces an orbital factor $(a/s)^2$ into $k_{42}$, where $a$ is the satellite semimajor axis and $s$ is Jupiter's average radius. As a result, different Galilean satellites produce a different $k_{42}$. We conclude that high-degree tesseral Love numbers ($\ell> m$, $m\geq2$) are dominated by lower-degree Love numbers and thus provide little additional information about interior structure, at least when they are primarily hydrostatic. Our results entail important implications for a future interpretation of the currently observed Juno $k_{42}$. After including the coupling from the well-understood $\ell=2$ dynamical tides ($Δk_2 \approx -4\%$), Jupiter's hydrostatic $k_{42}$ requires an unknown dynamical effect to produce a fractional correction $Δk_{42}\approx-11\%$ in order to fit Juno's observation within $3σ$. Future work is required to explain the required $Δk_{42}$.