Source author record

Cong X. Kang

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

16works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

16 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Distance-kk locating-dominating sets in graphs

Let GG be a graph with vertex set VV, and let kk be a positive integer. A set D⊆VD \subseteq V is a \emph{distance-kk dominating set} of GG if, for each vertex u∈V−Du \in V-D, there exists a vertex w∈Dw\in D such that d(u,w)≤kd(u,w) \le k, where d(u,w)d(u,w) is the minimum number of edges linking uu and ww in GG. Let dk(x,y)=min⁡{d(x,y),k+1}d_k(x, y)=\min\{d(x,y), k+1\}. A set R⊆VR\subseteq V is a \emph{distance-kk resolving set} of GG if, for any pair of distinct x,y∈Vx,y\in V, there exists a vertex z∈Rz\in R such that dk(x,z)≠dk(y,z)d_k(x,z) \neq d_k(y,z). The \emph{distance-kk domination number} γk(G)γ_k(G) (\emph{distance-kk dimension} dim⁡k(G)\dim_k(G), respectively) of GG is the minimum cardinality of all distance-kk dominating sets (distance-kk resolving sets, respectively) of GG. The \emph{distance-kk location-domination number}, γLk(G)γ_L^k(G), of GG is the minimum cardinality of all sets S⊆VS\subseteq V such that SS is both a distance-kk dominating set and a distance-kk resolving set of GG. Note that γL1(G)γ_L^1(G) is the well-known location-domination number introduced by Slater in 1988. For any connected graph GG of order n≥2n\ge 2, we obtain the following sharp bounds: (1) γk(G)≤dim⁡k(G)+1γ_k(G) \le \dim_k(G)+1; (2) 2≤γk(G)+dim⁡k(G)≤n2\leγ_k(G)+\dim_k(G) \le n; (3) 1≤max⁡{γk(G),dim⁡k(G)}≤γLk(G)≤min⁡{dim⁡k(G)+1,n−1}1\le \max\{γ_k(G), \dim_k(G)\} \le γ_L^k(G) \le \min\{\dim_k(G)+1, n-1\}. We characterize GG for which γLk(G)∈{1,∣V∣−1}γ_L^k(G)\in\{1, |V|-1\}. We observe that dim⁡k(G)γk(G)\frac{\dim_k(G)}{γ_k(G)} can be arbitrarily large. Moreover, for any tree TT of order n≥2n\ge 2, we show that γLk(T)≤n−ex(T)γ_L^k(T)\le n-ex(T), where ex(T)ex(T) denotes the number of exterior major vertices of TT, and we characterize trees TT achieving equality. We also examine the effect of edge deletion on the distance-kk location-domination number of graphs.

preprint2022arXiv

Maker-Breaker Metric Resolving Games on Graphs

Let d(x,y)d(x,y) denote the length of a shortest path between vertices xx and yy in a graph GG with vertex set VV. For a positive integer kk, let dk(x,y)=min⁡{d(x,y),k+1}d_k(x,y)=\min\{d(x,y), k+1\} and Rk{x,y}={z∈V:dk(x,z)≠dk(y,z)}R_k\{x,y\}=\{z\in V: d_k(x,z) \neq d_k(y,z)\}. A set S⊆VS \subseteq V is a \emph{distance-kk resolving set} of GG if S∩Rk{x,y}≠∅S \cap R_k\{x,y\} \neq\emptyset for distinct x,y∈Vx,y\in V. In this paper, we study the maker-breaker distance-kk resolving game (MBkkRG) played on a graph GG by two players, Maker and Breaker, who alternately select a vertex of GG not yet chosen. Maker wins by selecting vertices which form a distance-kk resolving set of GG, whereas Breaker wins by preventing Maker from winning. We denote by OR,k(G)O_{R,k}(G) the outcome of MBkkRG. Let M\mathcal{M}, B\mathcal{B} and N\mathcal{N}, respectively, denote the outcome for which Maker, Breaker, and the first player has a winning strategy in MBkkRG. Given a graph GG, the parameter OR,k(G)O_{R,k}(G) is a non-decreasing function of kk with codomain {−1=B,0=N,1=M}\{-1=\mathcal{B}, 0=\mathcal{N}, 1=\mathcal{M}\}. We exhibit pairs GG and kk such that the ordered pair (OR,k(G),OR,k+1(G))(O_{R,k}(G), O_{R, k+1}(G)) realizes each member of the set {(B,N),(B,M),(N,M)}\{(\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{N}),(\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{M}),(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M})\}; we provide graphs GG such that OR,1(G)=BO_{R,1}(G)=\mathcal{B}, OR,2(G)=NO_{R,2}(G)=\mathcal{N} and OR,k(G)=MO_{R,k}(G)=\mathcal{M} for k≥3k\ge3. Moreover, we obtain some general results on MBkkRG and study the MBkkRG played on some graph classes.

preprint2022arXiv

The Simultaneous Fractional Dimension of Graph Families

A subset SS of the vertices VV of a connected graph GG resolves GG if no two vertices of VV share the same list of distances (shortest-path metric) with respect to the vertices of SS listed in a given order. The choice of such an SS in VV amounts to selecting a binary valued function gg, said to be a resolving function, on VV. The notion of a fractional resolving function is obtained by relaxing the codomain of gg to be the unit interval. Let ∣g∣=∑v∈Vg(v)|g|=\sum_{v\in V}g(v). Given a finite collection G\mathcal{G} of connected graphs on a common vertex set VV, the simultaneous metric dimension of G\mathcal{G} is the minimum cardinality of ∣S∣|S| over all SS which resolve each member graph of G\mathcal{G}. In this paper, we initiate the study of simultaneous fractional dimension Sdf(G){\rm Sd}_f(\mathcal{G}) of a graph family G\mathcal{G}, defined to be the minimum ∣g∣|g| over all functions gg each resolving all members of G\mathcal{G}. We characterize the lower bound and examine the upper bound satisfied by Sdf(G){\rm Sd}_f(\mathcal{G}). We examine Sdf(G){\rm Sd}_f(\mathcal{G}) for families of vertex transitive graphs and for pairs {G,G‾}\{G,\overline{G}\} of complementary graphs, determining Sdf(G,G‾){\rm Sd}_f(G,\overline{G}) when GG is a tree or a unicyclic graph.

preprint2020arXiv

Maker-Breaker resolving game

A set of vertices WW of a graph GG is a resolving set if every vertex of GG is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to WW. In this paper, the Maker-Breaker resolving game is introduced. The game is played on a graph GG by Resolver and Spoiler who alternately select a vertex of GG not yet chosen. Resolver wins if at some point the vertices chosen by him form a resolving set of GG, whereas Spoiler wins if the Resolver cannot form a resolving set of GG. The outcome of the game is denoted by o(G)o(G) and RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) (resp. SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G)) denotes the minimum number of moves of Resolver (resp. Spoiler) to win when Resolver has the first move. The corresponding invariants for the game when Spoiler has the first move are denoted by RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G) and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G). Invariants RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G), RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G), SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G), and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G) are compared among themselves and with the metric dimension dim(G){\rm dim}(G). A large class of graphs GG is constructed for which RMB(G)>dim(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) > {\rm dim}(G) holds. The effect of twin equivalence classes and pairing resolving sets on the Maker-Breaker resolving game is described. As an application o(G)o(G), as well as RMB(G)R_{\rm MB}(G) and RMB′(G)R'_{\rm MB}(G) (or SMB(G)S_{\rm MB}(G) and SMB′(G)S'_{\rm MB}(G)), are determined for several graph classes, including trees, complete multi-partite graphs, grid graphs, and torus grid graphs.

preprint2020arXiv

On Laplacian Monopoles

We consider the action of the (combinatorial) Laplacian of a finite and simple graph on integer vectors. By a \emph{Laplacian monopole} we mean an image vector negative at exactly one coordinate associated with a vertex. We consider a numerical semigroup Hf(P)H_f(P) given by all monopoles at a vertex of a graph. The well-known analogy between finite graphs and algebraic curves (Riemann surfaces) has motivated much work. More specifically for us, the motivation arises out of the classical Weierstrass semigroup of a rational point on a curve whose properties are tied to the Riemann-Roch Theorem, as well as out of the graph theoretic Riemann-Roch Theorem demonstrated by Baker and Norine. We determine Hf(P)H_f(P) for some families of graphs and demonstrate a connection between Hf(P)H_f(P) and the vertex (also edge) connectivity of a graph. We also study Hr(P)H_r(P), another numerical semigroup which arises out of the result of Baker and Norine, and explore its connection to Hf(P)H_f(P) on graphs. We show that Hr(P)⊆Hf(P)H_r(P)\subseteq H_f(P) in a number of special cases. In contrast to the situation in the classical setting, we demonstrate that Hf(P)∖Hr(P)H_f(P)\setminus H_r(P) can be arbitrarily large and identify a potential obstruction to the inclusion of Hr(P)H_r(P) in Hf(P)H_f(P) in general, though we still conjecture this inclusion. We conclude with a few open questions.

preprint2018arXiv

The connected metric dimension at a vertex of a graph

The notion of metric dimension, dim(G)dim(G), of a graph GG, as well as a number of variants, is now well studied. In this paper, we begin a local analysis of this notion by introducing cdimG(v)cdim_G(v), \emph{the connected metric dimension of GG at a vertex vv}, which is defined as follows: a set of vertices SS of GG is a \emph{resolving set} if, for any pair of distinct vertices xx and yy of GG, there is a vertex z∈Sz \in S such that the distance between zz and xx is distinct from the distance between zz and yy in GG. We call a resolving set SS \emph{connected} if SS induces a connected subgraph of GG. Then, cdimG(v)cdim_G(v) is defined to be the minimum of the cardinalities of all connected resolving sets which contain the vertex vv. The \emph{connected metric dimension of GG}, denoted by cdim(G)cdim(G), is min⁡{cdimG(v):v∈V(G)}\min\{cdim_G(v): v \in V(G)\}. Noting that 1≤dim(G)≤cdim(G)≤cdimG(v)≤∣V(G)∣−11 \le dim(G) \le cdim(G) \le cdim_G(v) \le |V(G)|-1 for any vertex vv of GG, we show the existence of a pair (G,v)(G,v) such that cdimG(v)cdim_G(v) takes all positive integer values from dim(G)dim(G) to ∣V(G)∣−1|V (G)|-1, as vv varies in a fixed graph GG. We characterize graphs GG and their vertices vv satisfying cdimG(v)∈{1,∣V(G)∣−1}cdim_G(v) \in \{1, |V(G)|-1\}. We show that cdim(G)=2cdim(G)=2 implies GG is planar, whereas it is well known that there is a non-planar graph HH with dim(H)=2dim(H)=2. We also characterize trees and unicyclic graphs GG satisfying cdim(G)=dim(G)cdim(G)=dim(G). We show that cdim(G)−dim(G)cdim(G)-dim(G) can be arbitrarily large. We determine cdim(G)cdim(G) and cdimG(v)cdim_G(v) for some classes of graphs. We further examine the effect of vertex or edge deletion on the connected metric dimension. We conclude with some open problems.

preprint2018arXiv

The fractional kk-metric dimension of graphs

Let GG be a graph with vertex set V(G)V(G). For any two distinct vertices xx and yy of GG, let R{x,y}R\{x, y\} denote the set of vertices zz such that the distance from xx to zz is not equal to the distance from yy to zz in GG. For a function gg defined on V(G)V(G) and for U⊆V(G)U \subseteq V(G), let g(U)=∑s∈Ug(s)g(U)=\sum_{s \in U}g(s). Let $κ(G)=\min\{|R\{x,y\}|: x\neq y \mbox{ and } x,y \in V(G)\}$. For any real number k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], a real-valued function g:V(G)→[0,1]g: V(G) \rightarrow [0,1] is a \emph{kk-resolving function} of GG if g(R{x,y})≥kg(R\{x,y\}) \ge k for any two distinct vertices x,y∈V(G)x,y \in V(G). The \emph{fractional kk-metric dimension}, dim⁡fk(G)\dim^k_f(G), of GG is $\min\{g(V(G)): g \mbox{ is a $k$-resolving function of } G\}$. In this paper, we initiate the study of the fractional kk-metric dimension of graphs. For a connected graph GG and k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], it's easy to see that k≤dim⁡fk(G)≤k∣V(G)∣κ(G)k \le \dim_f^k(G) \le \frac{k|V(G)|}{κ(G)}; we characterize graphs GG satisfying dim⁡fk(G)=k\dim_f^k(G)=k and dim⁡fk(G)=∣V(G)∣\dim_f^k(G)=|V(G)|, respectively. We show that dim⁡fk(G)≥kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G) \ge k \dim_f(G) for any k∈[1,κ(G)]k \in [1, κ(G)], and we give an example showing that dim⁡fk(G)−kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G)-k\dim_f(G) can be arbitrarily large for some k∈(1,κ(G)]k \in (1, κ(G)]; we also describe a condition for which dim⁡fk(G)=kdim⁡f(G)\dim_f^k(G)=k\dim_f(G) holds. We determine the fractional kk-metric dimension for some classes of graphs, and conclude with two open problems, including whether ϕ(k)=dim⁡fk(G)ϕ(k)=\dim_f^k(G) is a continuous function of kk on every connected graph GG.

preprint2016arXiv

The fractional strong metric dimension in three graph products

For any two distinct vertices xx and yy of a graph GG, let S{x,y}S\{x, y\} denote the set of vertices zz such that either xx lies on a y−zy-z geodesic or yy lies on an x−zx-z geodesic. Let g:V(G)→[0,1]g: V(G) \rightarrow [0,1] be a real valued function and, for any U⊆V(G)U \subseteq V(G), let g(U)=∑v∈Ug(v)g(U)=\sum_{v \in U}g(v). The function gg is a strong resolving function of GG if g(S{x,y})≥1g(S\{x, y\}) \ge 1 for every pair of distinct vertices x,yx, y of GG. The fractional strong metric dimension, sdimf(G)sdim_f(G), of a graph GG is $\min\{g(V(G)): g \mbox{ is a strong resolving function of }G\}$. In this paper, after obtaining some new results for all connected graphs, we focus on the study of the fractional strong metric dimension of the corona product, the lexicographic product, and the Cartesian product of graphs.

preprint2014arXiv

A Comparison between the Zero Forcing Number and the Strong Metric Dimension of Graphs

The \emph{zero forcing number}, Z(G)Z(G), of a graph GG is the minimum cardinality of a set SS of black vertices (whereas vertices in V(G)−SV(G)-S are colored white) such that V(G)V(G) is turned black after finitely many applications of "the color-change rule": a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The \emph{strong metric dimension}, sdim(G)sdim(G), of a graph GG is the minimum among cardinalities of all strong resolving sets: W⊆V(G)W \subseteq V(G) is a \emph{strong resolving set} of GG if for any u,v∈V(G)u, v \in V(G), there exists an x∈Wx \in W such that either uu lies on an x−vx-v geodesic or vv lies on an x−ux-u geodesic. In this paper, we prove that Z(G)≤sdim(G)+3r(G)Z(G) \le sdim(G)+3r(G) for a connected graph GG, where r(G)r(G) is the cycle rank of GG. Further, we prove the sharp bound Z(G)≤sdim(G)Z(G) \leq sdim(G) when GG is a tree or a unicyclic graph, and we characterize trees TT attaining Z(T)=sdim(T)Z(T)=sdim(T). It is easy to see that sdim(T+e)−sdim(T)sdim(T+e)-sdim(T) can be arbitrarily large for a tree TT; we prove that sdim(T+e)≥sdim(T)−2sdim(T+e) \ge sdim(T)-2 and show that the bound is sharp.

preprint2014arXiv

On Domination Number and Distance in Graphs

A vertex set SS of a graph GG is a \emph{dominating set} if each vertex of GG either belongs to SS or is adjacent to a vertex in SS. The \emph{domination number} γ(G)γ(G) of GG is the minimum cardinality of SS as SS varies over all dominating sets of GG. It is known that γ(G)≥13(diam(G)+1)γ(G) \ge \frac{1}{3}(diam(G)+1), where diam(G)diam(G) denotes the diameter of GG. Define CrC_r as the largest constant such that γ(G)≥Cr∑1≤i<j≤rd(xi,xj)γ(G) \ge C_r \sum_{1 \le i < j \le r}d(x_i, x_j) for any rr vertices of an arbitrary connected graph GG; then C2=13C_2=\frac{1}{3} in this view. The main result of this paper is that Cr=1r(r−1)C_r=\frac{1}{r(r-1)} for r≥3r\geq 3. It immediately follows that γ(G)≥μ(G)=1n(n−1)W(G)γ(G)\geq μ(G)=\frac{1}{n(n-1)}W(G), where μ(G)μ(G) and W(G)W(G) are respectively the average distance and the Wiener index of GG of order nn. As an application of our main result, we prove a conjecture of DeLaViña et al.\;that γ(G)≥12(eccG(B)+1)γ(G)\geq \frac{1}{2}(ecc_G(B)+1), where eccG(B)ecc_G(B) denotes the eccentricity of the boundary of an arbitrary connected graph GG.

preprint2013arXiv

Metric Dimension and Zero Forcing Number of Two Families of Line Graphs

Zero forcing number has recently become an interesting graph parameter studied in its own right since its introduction by the "AIM Minimum Rank -- Special Graphs Work Group", whereas metric dimension is a well-known graph parameter. We investigate the metric dimension and the zero forcing number of some line graphs by first determining the metric dimension and the zero forcing number of the line graphs of wheel graphs and the bouquet of circles. We prove that Z(G)≤2Z(L(G))Z(G) \le 2Z(L(G)) for a simple and connected graph GG. Further, we show that Z(G)≤Z(L(G))Z(G) \le Z(L(G)) when GG is a tree or when GG contains a Hamiltonian path and has a certain number of edges. We compare the metric dimension with the zero forcing number of a line graph by demonstrating a couple of inequalities between the two parameters. We end by stating some open problems.

preprint2012arXiv

On Metric Dimension of Functigraphs

The \emph{metric dimension} of a graph GG, denoted by dim⁡(G)\dim(G), is the minimum number of vertices such that each vertex is uniquely determined by its distances to the chosen vertices. Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be disjoint copies of a graph GG and let f:V(G1)→V(G2)f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2) be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} C(G,f)=(V,E)C(G, f)=(V, E) has the vertex set V=V(G1)∪V(G2)V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2) and the edge set E=E(G1)∪E(G2)∪{uv∣v=f(u)}E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid v=f(u)\}. We study how metric dimension behaves in passing from GG to C(G,f)C(G,f) by first showing that 2≤dim⁡(C(G,f))≤2n−32 \le \dim(C(G, f)) \le 2n-3, if GG is a connected graph of order n≥3n \ge 3 and ff is any function. We further investigate the metric dimension of functigraphs on complete graphs and on cycles.

preprint2012arXiv

On Zero Forcing Number of Functigraphs

\emph{Zero forcing number}, Z(G)Z(G), of a graph GG is the minimum cardinality of a set SS of black vertices (whereas vertices in V(G)∖SV(G) \setminus S are colored white) such that V(G)V(G) is turned black after finitely many applications of "the color-change rule": a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. Zero forcing number was introduced and used to bound the minimum rank of graphs by the "AIM Minimum Rank -- Special Graphs Work Group". Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be disjoint copies of a graph GG and let f:V(G1)→V(G2)f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2) be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} C(G,f)=(V,E)C(G, f)=(V, E) has the vertex set V=V(G1)∪V(G2)V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2) and the edge set E=E(G1)∪E(G2)∪{uv∣v=f(u)}E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid v=f(u)\}. For a connected graph GG of order n≥3n \ge 3, it is readily seen that 1+δ(G)≤Z(C(G,σ))≤n1+δ(G) \le Z(C(G, σ)) \le n for any permutation σσ; we show that 1+δ(G)≤Z(C(G,f))≤2n−21+ δ(G) \le Z(C(G, f)) \le 2n-2 for any function ff, where δ(G)δ(G) is the minimum degree of GG. We give examples showing that there does not exist a function gg such that, for every pair (G,f)(G,f), Z(G)<g(Z(C(G,f)))Z(G)<g(Z(C(G,f))) or g(Z(G))>Z(C(G,f))g(Z(G))>Z(C(G,f)). We further investigate the zero forcing number of functigraphs on complete graphs, on cycles, and on paths.

preprint2012arXiv

Probabilistic Zero Forcing in Graphs

The \emph{zero forcing number} Z(G)Z(G) of a graph GG is the minimum cardinality of a set SS of black vertices (whereas vertices in $V(G)\setminusS$ are colored white) such that V(G)V(G) is turned black after finitely many applications of "the (classical) color change rule": a white vertex is converted to a black vertex if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. Zero forcing number was introduced and used to bound the minimum rank of graphs by the "AIM Minimum Rank - Special Graphs Work Group". We introduce here a probabilistic color change rule (pccr) which is a natural generalization of the classical color change rule. We introduce a theory of probabilistic zero forcing arising out of the pccr; the theory yields a quantity PA(G)P_A(G), which can be viewed as the probability that a graph GG with an initial black set AA will be converted entirely to the color black. We also interpret the evolution of the sample spaces of this theory as a Markov process. We end with a few basic examples illustrating this theory.

preprint2011arXiv

Domination in Functigraphs

Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be disjoint copies of a graph GG, and let f:V(G1)→V(G2)f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2) be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} C(G,f)=(V,E)C(G, f)=(V, E) has the vertex set V=V(G1)∪V(G2)V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2) and the edge set E=E(G1)∪E(G2)∪{uv∣u∈V(G1),v∈V(G2),v=f(u)}E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid u \in V(G_1), v \in V(G_2), v=f(u)\}. A functigraph is a generalization of a \emph{permutation graph} (also known as a \emph{generalized prism}) in the sense of Chartrand and Harary. In this paper, we study domination in functigraphs. Let γ(G)γ(G) denote the domination number of GG. It is readily seen that γ(G)≤γ(C(G,f))≤2γ(G)γ(G) \le γ(C(G,f)) \le 2 γ(G). We investigate for graphs generally, and for cycles in great detail, the functions which achieve the upper and lower bounds, as well as the realization of the intermediate values.

preprint2011arXiv

Iteration Index of a Zero Forcing Set in a Graph

Let each vertex of a graph G = (V(G), E(G)) be given one of two colors, say, "black" and "white". Let Z denote the (initial) set of black vertices of G. The color-change rule converts the color of a vertex from white to black if the white vertex is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The set Z is said to be a zero forcing set of G if all vertices of G will be turned black after finitely many applications of the color-change rule. The zero forcing number of G is the minimum of |Z| over all zero forcing sets Z \subseteq V (G). Zero forcing parameters have been studied and applied to the minimum rank problem for graphs in numerous articles. We define the iteration index of a zero forcing set of a graph G to be the number of (global) applications of the color-change rule required to turn all vertices of G black; this leads to a new graph invariant, the iteration index of G - it is the minimum of iteration indices of all minimum zero forcing sets of G. We present some basic properties of the iteration index and discuss some preliminary results on certain graphs.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.