Source author record

Linda Eroh

Linda Eroh appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

The Threshold Strong Dimension of a Graph

Let $G$ be a connected graph and $u,v$ and $w$ vertices of $G$. Then $w$ is said to {\em strongly resolve} $u$ and $v$, if there is either a shortest $u$-$w$ path that contains $v$ or a shortest $v$-$w$ path that contains $u$. A set $W$ of vertices of $G$ is a {\em strong resolving set} if every pair of vertices of $G$ is strongly resolved by some vertex of $W$. A smallest strong resolving set of a graph is called a {\em strong basis} and its cardinality, denoted $β_s(G)$, the {\em strong dimension} of $G$. The {\em threshold strong dimension} of a graph $G$, denoted $τ_s(G)$, is the smallest strong dimension among all graphs having $G$ as spanning subgraph. A graph whose strong dimension equals its threshold strong dimension is called $β_s$-{\em irreducible}. In this paper we establish a geometric characterization for the threshold strong dimension of a graph $G$ that is expressed in terms of the smallest number of paths (each of sufficiently large order) whose strong product admits a certain type of embedding of $G$. We demonstrate that the threshold strong dimension of a graph is not equal to the previously studied threshold dimension of a graph. Graphs with strong dimension $1$ and $2$ are necessarily $β_s$-irreducible. It is well-known that the only graphs with strong dimension $1$ are the paths. We completely describe graphs with strong dimension $2$ in terms of the strong resolving graphs introduced by Oellermann and Peters-Fransen. We obtain sharp upper bounds for the threshold strong dimension of general graphs and determine exact values for this invariant for certain subclasses of trees.

preprint2018arXiv

The connected metric dimension at a vertex of a graph

The notion of metric dimension, $dim(G)$, of a graph $G$, as well as a number of variants, is now well studied. In this paper, we begin a local analysis of this notion by introducing $cdim_G(v)$, \emph{the connected metric dimension of $G$ at a vertex $v$}, which is defined as follows: a set of vertices $S$ of $G$ is a \emph{resolving set} if, for any pair of distinct vertices $x$ and $y$ of $G$, there is a vertex $z \in S$ such that the distance between $z$ and $x$ is distinct from the distance between $z$ and $y$ in $G$. We call a resolving set $S$ \emph{connected} if $S$ induces a connected subgraph of $G$. Then, $cdim_G(v)$ is defined to be the minimum of the cardinalities of all connected resolving sets which contain the vertex $v$. The \emph{connected metric dimension of $G$}, denoted by $cdim(G)$, is $\min\{cdim_G(v): v \in V(G)\}$. Noting that $1 \le dim(G) \le cdim(G) \le cdim_G(v) \le |V(G)|-1$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$, we show the existence of a pair $(G,v)$ such that $cdim_G(v)$ takes all positive integer values from $dim(G)$ to $|V (G)|-1$, as $v$ varies in a fixed graph $G$. We characterize graphs $G$ and their vertices $v$ satisfying $cdim_G(v) \in \{1, |V(G)|-1\}$. We show that $cdim(G)=2$ implies $G$ is planar, whereas it is well known that there is a non-planar graph $H$ with $dim(H)=2$. We also characterize trees and unicyclic graphs $G$ satisfying $cdim(G)=dim(G)$. We show that $cdim(G)-dim(G)$ can be arbitrarily large. We determine $cdim(G)$ and $cdim_G(v)$ for some classes of graphs. We further examine the effect of vertex or edge deletion on the connected metric dimension. We conclude with some open problems.

preprint2015arXiv

A Graph Theoretical Analysis of the Number of Edges in k-dense Graphs

Due to the increasing discovery and implementation of networks within all disciplines of life, the study of subgraph connectivity has become increasingly important. Motivated by the idea of community (or sub-graph) detection within a network/graph, we focused on finding characterizations of k-dense communities. For each edge $uv\in E(G)$, the {\bf edge multiplicity} of $uv$ in $G$ is given by $m_G(uv)=|N_{G}(u)\cap N_{G}(v)|.$ For an integer $k$ with $k\ge 2$, a {\bf $k$-dense community} of a graph $G$, denoted by $DC_k(G)$, is a maximal connected subgraph of $G$ induced by the vertex set $$V_{DC_k(G)} = \{v\in V(G) : \exists u\in V(G)\ {\rm such\ that\} uv\in E(G)\ {\rm and\} m_{DC_{k(G)}}(uv)\ge k-2\}.$$ In this research, we characterize which graphs are $k$-dense but not $(k+1)$-dense for some values of $k$ and study the minimum and maximum number of edges such graphs can have. A better understanding of $k$-dense sub-graphs (or communities) helps in the study of the connectivity of large complex graphs (or networks) in the real world.

preprint2013arXiv

Metric Dimension and Zero Forcing Number of Two Families of Line Graphs

Zero forcing number has recently become an interesting graph parameter studied in its own right since its introduction by the "AIM Minimum Rank -- Special Graphs Work Group", whereas metric dimension is a well-known graph parameter. We investigate the metric dimension and the zero forcing number of some line graphs by first determining the metric dimension and the zero forcing number of the line graphs of wheel graphs and the bouquet of circles. We prove that $Z(G) \le 2Z(L(G))$ for a simple and connected graph $G$. Further, we show that $Z(G) \le Z(L(G))$ when $G$ is a tree or when $G$ contains a Hamiltonian path and has a certain number of edges. We compare the metric dimension with the zero forcing number of a line graph by demonstrating a couple of inequalities between the two parameters. We end by stating some open problems.

preprint2012arXiv

On Metric Dimension of Functigraphs

The \emph{metric dimension} of a graph $G$, denoted by $\dim(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices such that each vertex is uniquely determined by its distances to the chosen vertices. Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be disjoint copies of a graph $G$ and let $f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2)$ be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} $C(G, f)=(V, E)$ has the vertex set $V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2)$ and the edge set $E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid v=f(u)\}$. We study how metric dimension behaves in passing from $G$ to $C(G,f)$ by first showing that $2 \le \dim(C(G, f)) \le 2n-3$, if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n \ge 3$ and $f$ is any function. We further investigate the metric dimension of functigraphs on complete graphs and on cycles.

preprint2011arXiv

Domination in Functigraphs

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be disjoint copies of a graph $G$, and let $f: V(G_1) \rightarrow V(G_2)$ be a function. Then a \emph{functigraph} $C(G, f)=(V, E)$ has the vertex set $V=V(G_1) \cup V(G_2)$ and the edge set $E=E(G_1) \cup E(G_2) \cup \{uv \mid u \in V(G_1), v \in V(G_2), v=f(u)\}$. A functigraph is a generalization of a \emph{permutation graph} (also known as a \emph{generalized prism}) in the sense of Chartrand and Harary. In this paper, we study domination in functigraphs. Let $γ(G)$ denote the domination number of $G$. It is readily seen that $γ(G) \le γ(C(G,f)) \le 2 γ(G)$. We investigate for graphs generally, and for cycles in great detail, the functions which achieve the upper and lower bounds, as well as the realization of the intermediate values.