BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Clayton Shonkwiler

Clayton Shonkwiler contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DGmath.FAmath.GTmath.PRmath.SGcond-mat.stat-mechmath.ATmath.DS

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Land of Oblique Duality for Frames and Probabilistic Frames

Functions or distributions used to sample and to reconstruct signals often occur in different domains, like the Dirac delta and a band-limited bump function in classical sampling. Oblique dual frames generalize this phenomenon. In this paper, we provide new tools to study oblique dual frames and introduce a probabilistic variant of oblique dual frames. We first present the oblique dual frame potential and show that it is minimized precisely when the oblique dual coincides with the canonical oblique dual. We then define oblique dual probabilistic frames and oblique approximately dual probabilistic frames. In particular, we prove that for a given oblique dual probabilistic frame, the associated oblique dual probabilistic frame potential is minimized if and only if the frame is tight and the oblique dual is canonical. Moreover, the tightness assumption can be removed when the minimization is restricted to oblique dual probabilistic frames of pushforward type. Finally, we investigate perturbations of oblique dual probabilistic frames and show that if a probability measure is sufficiently close to an oblique dual probabilistic frame pair in the $2$-Wasserstein topology, then it forms an oblique approximately dual probabilistic frame.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Admissibility and Frame Homotopy for Quaternionic Frames

We consider the following questions: when do there exist quaternionic frames with given frame spectrum and given frame vector norms? When such frames exist, is it always possible to interpolate between any two while fixing their spectra and norms? In other words, the first question is the admissibility question for quaternionic frames and the second is a generalization of the frame homotopy conjecture. We give complete answers to both questions. For the first question, the existence criterion is exactly the same as in the real and complex cases. For the second, the non-empty spaces of quaternionic frames with specified frame spectrum and frame vector norms are always path-connected, just as in the complex case. Our strategy for proving these results is based on interpreting equivalence classes of frames with given frame spectrum as adjoint orbits, which is an approach that is also well-suited to the study of real and complex frames.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Random graph embeddings with general edge potentials

In this paper, we study random embeddings of polymer networks distributed according to any potential energy which can be expressed in terms of distances between pairs of monomers. This includes freely jointed chains, steric effects, Lennard-Jones potentials, bending energies, and other physically realistic models. A configuration of $n$ monomers in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be written as a collection of $d$ coordinate vectors, each in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Our first main result is that entries from different coordinate vectors are uncorrelated, even when they are different coordinates of the same monomer. We predict that this property holds in realistic simulations and in actual polymer configurations (in the absence of an external field). Our second main contribution is a theorem explaining when and how a probability distribution on embeddings of a complicated graph may be pushed forward to a distribution on embeddings of a simpler graph to aid in computations. This construction is based on the idea of chain maps in homology theory. We use it to give a new formula for edge covariances in phantom network theory and to compute some expectations for a freely-jointed network.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Toric Symplectic Geometry and Full Spark Frames

The collection of $d \times N$ complex matrices with prescribed column norms and prescribed (nonzero) singular values forms a compact algebraic variety, which we refer to as a frame space. Elements of frame spaces -- i.e., frames -- are used to give robust representations of complex-valued signals, so that geometrical and measure-theoretic properties of frame spaces are of interest to the signal processing community. This paper is concerned with the following question: what is the probability that a frame drawn uniformly at random from a given frame space has the property that any subset of $d$ of its columns gives a basis for $\mathbb{C}^d$? We show that the probability is one, generalizing recent work of Cahill, Mixon and Strawn. To prove this, we first show that frame spaces are related to highly structured objects called toric symplectic manifolds. This relationship elucidates the geometric meaning of eigensteps -- certain spectral invariants of a frame -- and should be a more broadly applicable tool for studying probabilistic questions about the structure of frame spaces. As another application of our symplectic perspective, we completely characterize the norm and spectral data for which the corresponding frame space has singularities, answering some open questions in the frame theory literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

All Prime Knots Through 10 Crossings Have Superbridge Index $\leq 5$

This paper gives new upper bounds on the stick numbers of the knots $9_{18}$, $10_{18}$, $10_{58}$, $10_{66}$, $10_{68}$, $10_{80}$, $10_{82}$, $10_{84}$, $10_{93}$, $10_{100}$, and $10_{152}$, as well as on the equilateral stick number of $10_{79}$. These bounds imply that the knots $10_{58}$, $10_{66}$, and $10_{80}$ have superbridge index $\leq 5$, completing the project of showing that no prime knots through 10 crossings can have superbridge index larger than 5. The current best bounds on stick number and superbridge index for prime knots through 10 crossings are given in Appendix A.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A fractal dimension for measures via persistent homology

We use persistent homology in order to define a family of fractal dimensions, denoted $\mathrm{dim}_{\mathrm{PH}}^i(μ)$ for each homological dimension $i\ge 0$, assigned to a probability measure $μ$ on a metric space. The case of $0$-dimensional homology ($i=0$) relates to work by Michael J Steele (1988) studying the total length of a minimal spanning tree on a random sampling of points. Indeed, if $μ$ is supported on a compact subset of Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^m$ for $m\ge2$, then Steele&#39;s work implies that $\mathrm{dim}_{\mathrm{PH}}^0(μ)=m$ if the absolutely continuous part of $μ$ has positive mass, and otherwise $\mathrm{dim}_{\mathrm{PH}}^0(μ)<m$. Experiments suggest that similar results may be true for higher-dimensional homology $0<i<m$, though this is an open question. Our fractal dimension is defined by considering a limit, as the number of points $n$ goes to infinity, of the total sum of the $i$-dimensional persistent homology interval lengths for $n$ random points selected from $μ$ in an i.i.d. fashion. To some measures $μ,$ we are able to assign a finer invariant, a curve measuring the limiting distribution of persistent homology interval lengths as the number of points goes to infinity. We prove this limiting curve exists in the case of $0$-dimensional homology when $μ$ is the uniform distribution over the unit interval, and conjecture that it exists when $μ$ is the rescaled probability measure for a compact set in Euclidean space with positive Lebesgue measure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

New Stick Number Bounds from Random Sampling of Confined Polygons

The stick number of a knot is the minimum number of segments needed to build a polygonal version of the knot. Despite its elementary definition and relevance to physical knots, the stick number is poorly understood: for most knots we only know bounds on the stick number. We adopt a Monte Carlo approach to finding better bounds, producing very large ensembles of random polygons in tight confinement to look for new examples of knots constructed from few segments. We generated a total of 220 billion random polygons, yielding either the exact stick number or an improved upper bound for more than 40% of the knots with 10 or fewer crossings for which the stick number was not previously known. We summarize the current state of the art in Appendix A, which gives the best known bounds on stick number for all knots up to 10 crossings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access