BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Claude Adnet

Claude Adnet appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.STStatistics TheoryArtificial Intelligenceeess.SPMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Near out-of-distribution detection for low-resolution radar micro-Doppler signatures

Near out-of-distribution detection (OODD) aims at discriminating semantically similar data points without the supervision required for classification. This paper puts forward an OODD use case for radar targets detection extensible to other kinds of sensors and detection scenarios. We emphasize the relevance of OODD and its specific supervision requirements for the detection of a multimodal, diverse targets class among other similar radar targets and clutter in real-life critical systems. We propose a comparison of deep and non-deep OODD methods on simulated low-resolution pulse radar micro-Doppler signatures, considering both a spectral and a covariance matrix input representation. The covariance representation aims at estimating whether dedicated second-order processing is appropriate to discriminate signatures. The potential contributions of labeled anomalies in training, self-supervised learning, contrastive learning insights and innovative training losses are discussed, and the impact of training set contamination caused by mislabelling is investigated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Maximum likelihood estimation of covariances of elliptically symmetric distributions

Elliptically symmetric distributions are widely used in portfolio modeling, as well as in signal processing applications for modeling impulsive background noises. Of particular interest are algorithms for covariance estimation and subspace detection in such backgrounds. This article tackles the issue of correctly estimating the covariance matrix associated to such models and detecting additional signal superimposed on such distributions. A particular attention is given to the proper accounting of the circular symmetry for the subclass of complex elliptical distributions in the case of complex signals. In particular Tyler's estimator is shown to be a maximum likelihood estimate over all elliptical models, and its extension to the complex case is shown to be a maximum likelihood estimate for the subclass of complex elliptical models (CES); other M-estimators are also shown to be maximum likelihood estimates over some restricted classes of elliptical models. The extension of Tyler's and other M-estimators to constrained covariance estimation is also discussed, in particular for toeplitz constrains. Finally likelihood ratio signal detection tests associated to the various estimators introduced in this article are also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Partial estimators and application to covariance estimation of gaussian and elliptical distributions

Robustness to outliers is often a desirable property of statistical estimators. Indeed many well known estimators offer very good optimal performance in theory but are unusable in applied contexts because of their sensitivity to outliers. Of particular interest to the authors is the case of covariance estimators in adaptive matched filtering schemes in signal processing applications such as RADAR and SONAR detection, for which a contamination by outliers of the estimated noise covariance can lead to a great impact on performances, in particular when these outliers are similar to the target signal of the matched filter. This paper presents a generic method for building partial estimators from known estimators, which aim at avoiding these issues; the resulting algorithms are shown for a few chosen cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Regularized maximum likelihood estimation of covariance matrices of elliptical distributions

The maximum likelihood principle is widely used in statistics, and the associated estimators often display good properties. indeed maximum likelihood estimators are guaranteed to be asymptotically efficient under mild conditions. However in some settings, one has too few samples to get a good estimation. It then becomes desirable to take into account prior information about the distribution one wants to estimate. One possible approach is to extend the maximum likelihood principle in a bayesian context, which then becomes a maximum a posteriori estimate; however this requires a distribution model on the distribution parameters. We shall therefore concentrate on the alternative approach of regularized estimators in this paper; we will show how they can be naturally introduced in the framework of maximum likelihood estimation, and how they can be extended to form robust estimators which can reject outliers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access