BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Chunjie Luo

Chunjie Luo appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
PerformanceDatabasesComputer VisionDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingMachine LearningArtificial Intelligenceeess.IVInformation Retrieval

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

HPC AI500: Representative, Repeatable and Simple HPC AI Benchmarking

Recent years witness a trend of applying large-scale distributed deep learning algorithms (HPC AI) in both business and scientific computing areas, whose goal is to speed up the training time to achieve a state-of-the-art quality. The HPC AI benchmarks accelerate the process. Unfortunately, benchmarking HPC AI systems at scale raises serious challenges. This paper presents a representative, repeatable and simple HPC AI benchmarking methodology. Among the seventeen AI workloads of AIBench Training -- by far the most comprehensive AI Training benchmarks suite -- we choose two representative and repeatable AI workloads. The selected HPC AI benchmarks include both business and scientific computing: Image Classification and Extreme Weather Analytics. To rank HPC AI systems, we present a new metric named Valid FLOPS, emphasizing both throughput performance and a target quality. The specification, source code, datasets, and HPC AI500 ranking numbers are publicly available from \url{https://www.benchcouncil.org/HPCAI500/}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

AIBench: An Agile Domain-specific Benchmarking Methodology and an AI Benchmark Suite

Domain-specific software and hardware co-design is encouraging as it is much easier to achieve efficiency for fewer tasks. Agile domain-specific benchmarking speeds up the process as it provides not only relevant design inputs but also relevant metrics, and tools. Unfortunately, modern workloads like Big data, AI, and Internet services dwarf the traditional one in terms of code size, deployment scale, and execution path, and hence raise serious benchmarking challenges. This paper proposes an agile domain-specific benchmarking methodology. Together with seventeen industry partners, we identify ten important end-to-end application scenarios, among which sixteen representative AI tasks are distilled as the AI component benchmarks. We propose the permutations of essential AI and non-AI component benchmarks as end-to-end benchmarks. An end-to-end benchmark is a distillation of the essential attributes of an industry-scale application. We design and implement a highly extensible, configurable, and flexible benchmark framework, on the basis of which, we propose the guideline for building end-to-end benchmarks, and present the first end-to-end Internet service AI benchmark. The preliminary evaluation shows the value of our benchmark suite---AIBench against MLPerf and TailBench for hardware and software designers, micro-architectural researchers, and code developers. The specifications, source code, testbed, and results are publicly available from the web site \url{http://www.benchcouncil.org/AIBench/index.html}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Comparison and Benchmarking of AI Models and Frameworks on Mobile Devices

Due to increasing amounts of data and compute resources, deep learning achieves many successes in various domains. The application of deep learning on the mobile and embedded devices is taken more and more attentions, benchmarking and ranking the AI abilities of mobile and embedded devices becomes an urgent problem to be solved. Considering the model diversity and framework diversity, we propose a benchmark suite, AIoTBench, which focuses on the evaluation of the inference abilities of mobile and embedded devices. AIoTBench covers three typical heavy-weight networks: ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, as well as three light-weight networks: SqueezeNet, MobileNetV2, MnasNet. Each network is implemented by three frameworks which are designed for mobile and embedded devices: Tensorflow Lite, Caffe2, Pytorch Mobile. To compare and rank the AI capabilities of the devices, we propose two unified metrics as the AI scores: Valid Images Per Second (VIPS) and Valid FLOPs Per Second (VOPS). Currently, we have compared and ranked 5 mobile devices using our benchmark. This list will be extended and updated soon after.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extended Batch Normalization

Batch normalization (BN) has become a standard technique for training the modern deep networks. However, its effectiveness diminishes when the batch size becomes smaller, since the batch statistics estimation becomes inaccurate. That hinders batch normalization's usage for 1) training larger model which requires small batches constrained by memory consumption, 2) training on mobile or embedded devices of which the memory resource is limited. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective method, called extended batch normalization (EBN). For NCHW format feature maps, extended batch normalization computes the mean along the (N, H, W) dimensions, as the same as batch normalization, to maintain the advantage of batch normalization. To alleviate the problem caused by small batch size, extended batch normalization computes the standard deviation along the (N, C, H, W) dimensions, thus enlarges the number of samples from which the standard deviation is computed. We compare extended batch normalization with batch normalization and group normalization on the datasets of MNIST, CIFAR-10/100, STL-10, and ImageNet, respectively. The experiments show that extended batch normalization alleviates the problem of batch normalization with small batch size while achieving close performances to batch normalization with large batch size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Finet: Using Fine-grained Batch Normalization to Train Light-weight Neural Networks

To build light-weight network, we propose a new normalization, Fine-grained Batch Normalization (FBN). Different from Batch Normalization (BN), which normalizes the final summation of the weighted inputs, FBN normalizes the intermediate state of the summation. We propose a novel light-weight network based on FBN, called Finet. At training time, the convolutional layer with FBN can be seen as an inverted bottleneck mechanism. FBN can be fused into convolution at inference time. After fusion, Finet uses the standard convolution with equal channel width, thus makes the inference more efficient. On ImageNet classification dataset, Finet achieves the state-of-art performance (65.706% accuracy with 43M FLOPs, and 73.786% accuracy with 303M FLOPs), Moreover, experiments show that Finet is more efficient than other state-of-art light-weight networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

HPC AI500: The Methodology, Tools, Roofline Performance Models, and Metrics for Benchmarking HPC AI Systems

The recent years witness a trend of applying large-scale distributed deep learning in both business and scientific computing areas, whose goal is to speed up the training time to achieve a state-of-the-art quality. The HPC community feels a great interest in building the HPC AI systems that are dedicated to running those workloads. The HPC AI benchmarks accelerate the process. Unfortunately, benchmarking HPC AI systems at scale raises serious challenges. None of previous HPC AI benchmarks achieve the goal of being equivalent, relevant, representative, affordable, and repeatable. This paper presents a comprehensive methodology, tools, Roofline performance models, and innovative metrics for benchmarking, optimizing, and ranking HPC AI systems, which we call HPC AI500 V2.0. We abstract the HPC AI system into nine independent layers, and present explicit benchmarking rules and procedures to assure equivalence of each layer, repeatability, and replicability. On the basis of AIBench -- by far the most comprehensive AI benchmarks suite, we present and build two HPC AI benchmarks from both business and scientific computing: Image Classification, and Extreme Weather Analytics, achieving both representativeness and affordability. To rank the performance and energy-efficiency of HPC AI systems, we propose Valid FLOPS, and Valid FLOPS per watt, which impose a penalty on failing to achieve the target quality. We propose using convolution and GEMM -- the two most intensively-used kernel functions to measure the upper bound performance of the HPC AI systems, and present HPC AI roofline models for guiding performance optimizations. The evaluations show our methodology, benchmarks, performance models, and metrics can measure, optimize, and rank the HPC AI systems in a scalable, simple, and affordable way. HPC AI500 V2.0 are publicly available from http://www.benchcouncil.org/benchhub/hpc-ai500-benchmark.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Identifying Dwarfs Workloads in Big Data Analytics

Big data benchmarking is particularly important and provides applicable yardsticks for evaluating booming big data systems. However, wide coverage and great complexity of big data computing impose big challenges on big data benchmarking. How can we construct a benchmark suite using a minimum set of units of computation to represent diversity of big data analytics workloads? Big data dwarfs are abstractions of extracting frequently appearing operations in big data computing. One dwarf represents one unit of computation, and big data workloads are decomposed into one or more dwarfs. Furthermore, dwarfs workloads rather than vast real workloads are more cost-efficient and representative to evaluate big data systems. In this paper, we extensively investigate six most important or emerging application domains i.e. search engine, social network, e-commerce, multimedia, bioinformatics and astronomy. After analyzing forty representative algorithms, we single out eight dwarfs workloads in big data analytics other than OLAP, which are linear algebra, sampling, logic operations, transform operations, set operations, graph operations, statistic operations and sort.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Understanding Big Data Analytic Workloads on Modern Processors

Big data analytics applications play a significant role in data centers, and hence it has become increasingly important to understand their behaviors in order to further improve the performance of data center computer systems, in which characterizing representative workloads is a key practical problem. In this paper, after investigating three most impor- tant application domains in terms of page views and daily visitors, we chose 11 repre- sentative data analytics workloads and characterized their micro-architectural behaviors by using hardware performance counters, so as to understand the impacts and implications of data analytics workloads on the systems equipped with modern superscalar out-of-order processors. Our study reveals that big data analytics applications themselves share many inherent characteristics, which place them in a different class from traditional workloads and scale-out services. To further understand the characteristics of big data analytics work- loads we performed a correlation analysis of CPI (cycles per instruction) with other micro- architecture level characteristics and an investigation of the big data software stack impacts on application behaviors. Our correlation analysis showed that even though big data ana- lytics workloads own notable pipeline front end stalls, the main factors affecting the CPI performance are long latency data accesses rather than the front end stalls. Our software stack investigation found that the typical big data software stack significantly contributes to the front end stalls and incurs bigger working set. Finally we gave several recommen- dations for architects, programmers and big data system designers with the knowledge acquired from this paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

BDGS: A Scalable Big Data Generator Suite in Big Data Benchmarking

Data generation is a key issue in big data benchmarking that aims to generate application-specific data sets to meet the 4V requirements of big data. Specifically, big data generators need to generate scalable data (Volume) of different types (Variety) under controllable generation rates (Velocity) while keeping the important characteristics of raw data (Veracity). This gives rise to various new challenges about how we design generators efficiently and successfully. To date, most existing techniques can only generate limited types of data and support specific big data systems such as Hadoop. Hence we develop a tool, called Big Data Generator Suite (BDGS), to efficiently generate scalable big data while employing data models derived from real data to preserve data veracity. The effectiveness of BDGS is demonstrated by developing six data generators covering three representative data types (structured, semi-structured and unstructured) and three data sources (text, graph, and table data).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

BigDataBench: a Big Data Benchmark Suite from Internet Services

As architecture, systems, and data management communities pay greater attention to innovative big data systems and architectures, the pressure of benchmarking and evaluating these systems rises. Considering the broad use of big data systems, big data benchmarks must include diversity of data and workloads. Most of the state-of-the-art big data benchmarking efforts target evaluating specific types of applications or system software stacks, and hence they are not qualified for serving the purposes mentioned above. This paper presents our joint research efforts on this issue with several industrial partners. Our big data benchmark suite BigDataBench not only covers broad application scenarios, but also includes diverse and representative data sets. BigDataBench is publicly available from http://prof.ict.ac.cn/BigDataBench . Also, we comprehensively characterize 19 big data workloads included in BigDataBench with varying data inputs. On a typical state-of-practice processor, Intel Xeon E5645, we have the following observations: First, in comparison with the traditional benchmarks: including PARSEC, HPCC, and SPECCPU, big data applications have very low operation intensity; Second, the volume of data input has non-negligible impact on micro-architecture characteristics, which may impose challenges for simulation-based big data architecture research; Last but not least, corroborating the observations in CloudSuite and DCBench (which use smaller data inputs), we find that the numbers of L1 instruction cache misses per 1000 instructions of the big data applications are higher than in the traditional benchmarks; also, we find that L3 caches are effective for the big data applications, corroborating the observation in DCBench.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Characterizing and Subsetting Big Data Workloads

Big data benchmark suites must include a diversity of data and workloads to be useful in fairly evaluating big data systems and architectures. However, using truly comprehensive benchmarks poses great challenges for the architecture community. First, we need to thoroughly understand the behaviors of a variety of workloads. Second, our usual simulation-based research methods become prohibitively expensive for big data. As big data is an emerging field, more and more software stacks are being proposed to facilitate the development of big data applications, which aggravates hese challenges. In this paper, we first use Principle Component Analysis (PCA) to identify the most important characteristics from 45 metrics to characterize big data workloads from BigDataBench, a comprehensive big data benchmark suite. Second, we apply a clustering technique to the principle components obtained from the PCA to investigate the similarity among big data workloads, and we verify the importance of including different software stacks for big data benchmarking. Third, we select seven representative big data workloads by removing redundant ones and release the BigDataBench simulation version, which is publicly available from http://prof.ict.ac.cn/BigDataBench/simulatorversion/.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

BigDataBench: a Big Data Benchmark Suite from Web Search Engines

This paper presents our joint research efforts on big data benchmarking with several industrial partners. Considering the complexity, diversity, workload churns, and rapid evolution of big data systems, we take an incremental approach in big data benchmarking. For the first step, we pay attention to search engines, which are the most important domain in Internet services in terms of the number of page views and daily visitors. However, search engine service providers treat data, applications, and web access logs as business confidentiality, which prevents us from building benchmarks. To overcome those difficulties, with several industry partners, we widely investigated the open source solutions in search engines, and obtained the permission of using anonymous Web access logs. Moreover, with two years' great efforts, we created a sematic search engine named ProfSearch (available from http://prof.ict.ac.cn). These efforts pave the path for our big data benchmark suite from search engines---BigDataBench, which is released on the web page (http://prof.ict.ac.cn/BigDataBench). We report our detailed analysis of search engine workloads, and present our benchmarking methodology. An innovative data generation methodology and tool are proposed to generate scalable volumes of big data from a small seed of real data, preserving semantics and locality of data. Also, we preliminarily report two case studies using BigDataBench for both system and architecture researches.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Characterizing Data Analysis Workloads in Data Centers

As the amount of data explodes rapidly, more and more corporations are using data centers to make effective decisions and gain a competitive edge. Data analysis applications play a significant role in data centers, and hence it has became increasingly important to understand their behaviors in order to further improve the performance of data center computer systems. In this paper, after investigating three most important application domains in terms of page views and daily visitors, we choose eleven representative data analysis workloads and characterize their micro-architectural characteristics by using hardware performance counters, in order to understand the impacts and implications of data analysis workloads on the systems equipped with modern superscalar out-of-order processors. Our study on the workloads reveals that data analysis applications share many inherent characteristics, which place them in a different class from desktop (SPEC CPU2006), HPC (HPCC), and service workloads, including traditional server workloads (SPECweb2005) and scale-out service workloads (four among six benchmarks in CloudSuite), and accordingly we give several recommendations for architecture and system optimizations. On the basis of our workload characterization work, we released a benchmark suite named DCBench for typical datacenter workloads, including data analysis and service workloads, with an open-source license on our project home page on http://prof.ict.ac.cn/DCBench. We hope that DCBench is helpful for performing architecture and small-to-medium scale system researches for datacenter computing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

High Volume Computing: Identifying and Characterizing Throughput Oriented Workloads in Data Centers

For the first time, this paper systematically identifies three categories of throughput oriented workloads in data centers: services, data processing applications, and interactive real-time applications, whose targets are to increase the volume of throughput in terms of processed requests or data, or supported maximum number of simultaneous subscribers, respectively, and we coin a new term high volume computing (in short HVC) to describe those workloads and data center computer systems designed for them. We characterize and compare HVC with other computing paradigms, e.g., high throughput computing, warehouse-scale computing, and cloud computing, in terms of levels, workloads, metrics, coupling degree, data scales, and number of jobs or service instances. We also preliminarily report our ongoing work on the metrics and benchmarks for HVC systems, which is the foundation of designing innovative data center computer systems for HVC workloads.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access