Researcher profile

Ben Burningham

Ben Burningham contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Retrieval of SDSS J1416+1348AB

We present the distance-calibrated spectral energy distribution (SED) of the d/sdL7 SDSS J14162408+1348263A (J1416A) and an updated SED for SDSS J14162408+1348263B (J1416B). We also present the first retrieval analysis of J1416A using the Brewster retrieval code base and the second retrieval of J1416B. We find that the primary is best fit by a non-grey cloud opacity with a power-law wavelength dependence, but is indistinguishable between the type of cloud parameterization. J1416B is best fit by a cloud-free model, consistent with the results from Line et al. (2017). Most fundamental parameters derived via SEDs and retrievals are consistent within 1 sigma for both J1416A and J1416B. The exceptions include the radius of J1416A, where the retrieved radius is smaller than the evolutionary model-based radius from the SED for the deck cloud model, and the bolometric luminosity which is consistent within 2.5 sigma for both cloud models. The pair's metallicity and Carbon-to-Oxygen (C/O) ratio point towards formation and evolution as a system. By comparing the retrieved alkali abundances while using two opacity models, we are able to evaluate how the opacities behave for the L and T dwarf. Lastly, we find that relatively small changes in composition can drive major observable differences for lower temperature objects.

preprint2013arXiv

The Kinematic Age of the Coolest T Dwarfs

Surprisingly, current atmospheric models suggest that the coolest T dwarfs (T8.5 to T10) are young and very low mass (0.06-2Gyr, 5-20Mjup, Leggett et al.2009, 2010, 2012). Studies of population kinematics offer an independent constraint on the age of the population. We present kinematic data of a sample of 75 mid to late T dwarfs drawn from a variety of sources. We define our samples, T5.5 to T8 and T8.5 to T10, as mid and late T respectively. UKIDSS LAS kinematics were derived from our automated LAS proper motion pipeline and distance estimates derived from spectral types and photometry for the minority of sources that lack parallaxes. Our results show that the mid and late T populations do not have distinctly separate tangential velocity distributions to 95% probability. They also give an approximate mean kinematic age equal to that of a population with B-V colour 0.51-0.54, and a spectral type late F, which corresponds to an age of about 2 Gyr. However the median and modal ages are greater. This indicates that while model atmospheres correctly predict some trends in colour with gravity and age, reliable ages cannot yet be inferred from them. More benchmark objects are needed to anchor the models.