Paper detail

The Kinematic Age of the Coolest T Dwarfs

Surprisingly, current atmospheric models suggest that the coolest T dwarfs (T8.5 to T10) are young and very low mass (0.06-2Gyr, 5-20Mjup, Leggett et al.2009, 2010, 2012). Studies of population kinematics offer an independent constraint on the age of the population. We present kinematic data of a sample of 75 mid to late T dwarfs drawn from a variety of sources. We define our samples, T5.5 to T8 and T8.5 to T10, as mid and late T respectively. UKIDSS LAS kinematics were derived from our automated LAS proper motion pipeline and distance estimates derived from spectral types and photometry for the minority of sources that lack parallaxes. Our results show that the mid and late T populations do not have distinctly separate tangential velocity distributions to 95% probability. They also give an approximate mean kinematic age equal to that of a population with B-V colour 0.51-0.54, and a spectral type late F, which corresponds to an age of about 2 Gyr. However the median and modal ages are greater. This indicates that while model atmospheres correctly predict some trends in colour with gravity and age, reliable ages cannot yet be inferred from them. More benchmark objects are needed to anchor the models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.