Paper detail

Mid-Infrared Photometry of Cold Brown Dwarfs: Diversity in Age, Mass and Metallicity

We present Spitzer IRAC photometry of twelve very late-type T dwarfs; nine have [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0] photometry and three have [3.6] and [4.5] photometry only. We investigate trends with type and color for the planning and interpretation of surveys for the coldest T or Y dwarfs. Brown dwarfs with effective temperature (T_eff) below 700K emit more than half their flux at wavelengths beyond 3um, and the ratio of the mid-infrared flux to the near-infrared flux becomes very sensitive to T_eff. The color H-[4.5] is a good indicator of T_eff with a relatively weak dependence on metallicity and gravity. Conversely, the colors H-K and [4.5]-[5.8] are sensitive to metallicity and gravity. Thus near- and mid-infrared photometry provide useful indicators of the fundamental properties of brown dwarfs, and if temperature and gravity are known, then mass and age can be determined from evolutionary models. There are twelve dwarfs known with H-[4.5]>3.0, and 500< T_eff K < 800, which we examine in detail. The ages of these dwarfs range from very young (0.1-1.0 Gyr) to relatively old (3-12 Gyr). The mass range is possibly as low as 5 Jupiter masses to up to 70 Jupiter masses. The metallicities also span a large range, from [m/H] -0.3 to [m/H] +0.3. The small number of T8-T9 dwarfs found in the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey to date appear to be mostly young low-mass dwarfs. Extensions to the mid-infrared space missions warm-Spitzer and WISE are desirable in order to obtain the vital mid-infrared data for cold brown dwarfs, and to discover more of these rare objects. (Abridged.)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.