Source author record

B. P. Duggal

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

8works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

8 publications

preprint2021arXiv

On Weak Supercyclicity II

This paper considers weak supercyclicity for bounded linear operators on a normed space. On the one hand, weak supercyclicity is investigated for classes of Hilbert-space operators: (i) self-adjoint operators are not weakly supercyclic, (ii) diagonalizable operators are not weakly l-sequentially supercyclic, and (iii) weak l-sequential supercyclicity is preserved between a unitary operator and its adjoint. On the other hand, weak supercyclicity is investigated for classes of normed-space operators: (iv) the point spectrum of the normed-space adjoint of a power bounded supercyclic operator is either empty or is a singleton in the open unit disk, (v) weak l-sequential supercyclicity coincides with supercyclicity for compact operators, and (vi) every compact weakly l-sequentially supercyclic operator is quasinilpotent.

preprint2020arXiv

Left m-invertibility by the adjoint of Drazin inverse and m-selfadjointness of Hilbert space operators

A Hilbert space operator $A\in\B$ is left (X,m)(X,m)-invertible by $B\in\B$ (resp., $B\in\B$ is an (X,m)(X,m)-adjoint of $A\in\B$) for some operator $X\in\B$ if △B,Am(X)=∑j=0m(−1)j(mj)Bm−jXAm−j=0\triangle_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{m-j}XA^{m-j}=0 (resp., δB,Am(X)=∑j=0m(−1)j(mj)B(m−j)XAj=0δ_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{(m-j)}XA^j=0). No Drazin invertible operator $A\in\B$, with Drazin inverse AdA_d, can be left (I,m)(I,m)-invertible (equivalently, mm-invertible) by its adjoint or its Drazin inverse or the adjoint of its Drazin inverse. For Drazin inverrtible operators AA, it is seen that the existence of an XX acts as a conduit for implications △B,A(X)=0⟹δC,Am(X)=0\triangle_{B,A}(X)=0\Longrightarrow δ^m_{C,A}(X)=0, where the pair (B,C)=(B,C)= either (A,Ad)(A,A_d) or (Ad,A)(A_d,A) or (A∗,Ad∗)(A^*,A^*_d) or (Ad∗,A∗)(A^*_d,A^*). Reverse implications fail. Assuming certain commutativity conditions, it is seen that △Ad∗,Am(X)=0=△Bd∗,Bn(Y)\triangle_{A^*_d,A}^m(X)=0=\triangle^n_{B^*_d,B}(Y) implies δA∗B∗,ABm+n−1(XY)=0=δA∗+B∗,A+Bm+n−1(XY)δ^{m+n-1}_{A^*B^*,AB}(XY)=0=δ^{m+n-1}_{A^*+B^*,A+B}(XY).

preprint2015arXiv

Compact perturbations and consequent hereditarily polaroid operators

A Banach space operator A∈B(X)A\in B({\cal{X}}) is polaroid, A∈PA\in {\cal{P}}, if the isolated points of the spectrum σ(A)σ(A) are poles of the operator; AA is hereditarily polaroid, A∈HPA\in{\cal{HP}}, if every restriction of AA to a closed invariant subspace is polaroid. Operators A∈HPA\in{\cal{HP}} have SVEP on Φsf(A)={λ:A−λΦ_{sf}(A)=\{λ: A-λ is semi Fredholm }\}: This, in answer to a question posed by Li and Zhou (Studia Math. 221(2014), 175-192), proves the necessity of the condition Φsf+(A)=∅Φ_{sf}^+(A)=\emptyset. A sufficient condition for A∈B(X)A\in B({\cal{X}}) to have SVEP on Φsf(A)Φ_{sf}(A) is that its component Ωa(A)={λ∈Φsf(A):ind(A−λ)≤0}Ω_a(A)=\{λ\inΦ_{sf}(A): \rm{ind}(A-λ)\leq 0\} is connected. We prove: If A∈B(H)A\in B({\cal{H}}) is a Hilbert space operator, then a necessary and sufficient condition for there to exist a compact operator KK such that A+K∈HPA+K\in{\cal{HP}} is that Ωa(A)Ω_a(A) is connected.

preprint2014arXiv

Property (gw) for tensor product and left-right multiplication operators

Given Banach spaces XX and YY and operators A∈B(X)A\in B(X) and B∈B(Y)B\in B(Y), property (gw)(gw) does not in general transfer from AA and BB to the tensor product operator A⊗B∈B(X⊗‾Y)A\otimes B\in B(X\overline{\otimes} Y) or to the elementary operator defined by AA and BB, τAB=LARB∈B(B(Y,X))τ_{AB}=L_AR_B\in B(B(Y,X)). In this article necessary and sufficient conditions ensuring that property (gw)(gw) transfers from AA and BB to A⊗BA\otimes B and to τABτ_{AB} will be given.

preprint2014arXiv

Tensor product of left polaroid operators

A Banach space operator T∈B(X)T\in B(X) is left polaroid if for each λ∈isoσa(T)λ\in\hbox{iso}σ_a(T) there is an integer d(λ)d(λ) such that asc (T−λ)=d(λ)<∞(T-λ)=d(λ)<\infty and (T−λ)d(λ)+1X(T-λ)^{d(λ)+1}X is closed; TT is finitely left polaroid if asc (T−λ)<∞(T-λ)<\infty, (T−λ)X(T-λ)X is closed and dim⁡(T−λ)−1(0)<∞\dim(T-λ)^{-1}(0)<\infty at each λ∈iso σa(T)λ\in\hbox{iso }σ_a(T). The left polaroid property transfers from AA and BB to their tensor product A⊗BA\otimes B, hence also from AA and B∗B^* to the left-right multiplication operator τABτ_{AB}, for Hilbert space operators; an additional condition is required for Banach space operators. The finitely left polaroid property transfers from AA and BB to their tensor product A⊗BA\otimes B if and only if 0∉isoσa(A⊗B)0\not\in\hbox{iso}σ_a(A\otimes B); a similar result holds for τABτ_{AB} for finitely left polaroid AA and B∗B^*.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.