On Weak Supercyclicity I
This paper provides conditions (i) to distinguish weak supercyclicity form supercyclicity for operators acting on normed and Banach spaces, and also (ii) to ensure when weak supercyclicity implies weak stability.
Discover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
B. P. Duggal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
This paper provides conditions (i) to distinguish weak supercyclicity form supercyclicity for operators acting on normed and Banach spaces, and also (ii) to ensure when weak supercyclicity implies weak stability.
This paper considers weak supercyclicity for bounded linear operators on a normed space. On the one hand, weak supercyclicity is investigated for classes of Hilbert-space operators: (i) self-adjoint operators are not weakly supercyclic, (ii) diagonalizable operators are not weakly l-sequentially supercyclic, and (iii) weak l-sequential supercyclicity is preserved between a unitary operator and its adjoint. On the other hand, weak supercyclicity is investigated for classes of normed-space operators: (iv) the point spectrum of the normed-space adjoint of a power bounded supercyclic operator is either empty or is a singleton in the open unit disk, (v) weak l-sequential supercyclicity coincides with supercyclicity for compact operators, and (vi) every compact weakly l-sequentially supercyclic operator is quasinilpotent.
A Hilbert space operator $A\in\B$ is left $(X,m)$-invertible by $B\in\B$ (resp., $B\in\B$ is an $(X,m)$-adjoint of $A\in\B$) for some operator $X\in\B$ if $\triangle_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{m-j}XA^{m-j}=0$ (resp., $δ_{B,A}^m(X)=\sum_{j=0}^m(-1)^j\left(\begin{array}{clcr}m\\j\end{array}\right)B^{(m-j)}XA^j=0$). No Drazin invertible operator $A\in\B$, with Drazin inverse $A_d$, can be left $(I,m)$-invertible (equivalently, $m$-invertible) by its adjoint or its Drazin inverse or the adjoint of its Drazin inverse. For Drazin inverrtible operators $A$, it is seen that the existence of an $X$ acts as a conduit for implications $\triangle_{B,A}(X)=0\Longrightarrow δ^m_{C,A}(X)=0$, where the pair $(B,C)=$ either $(A,A_d)$ or $(A_d,A)$ or $(A^*,A^*_d)$ or $(A^*_d,A^*)$. Reverse implications fail. Assuming certain commutativity conditions, it is seen that $\triangle_{A^*_d,A}^m(X)=0=\triangle^n_{B^*_d,B}(Y)$ implies $δ^{m+n-1}_{A^*B^*,AB}(XY)=0=δ^{m+n-1}_{A^*+B^*,A+B}(XY)$.
A Banach space operator $A\in B({\cal{X}})$ is polaroid, $A\in {\cal{P}}$, if the isolated points of the spectrum $σ(A)$ are poles of the operator; $A$ is hereditarily polaroid, $A\in{\cal{HP}}$, if every restriction of $A$ to a closed invariant subspace is polaroid. Operators $A\in{\cal{HP}}$ have SVEP on $Φ_{sf}(A)=\{λ: A-λ$ is semi Fredholm $\}$: This, in answer to a question posed by Li and Zhou (Studia Math. 221(2014), 175-192), proves the necessity of the condition $Φ_{sf}^+(A)=\emptyset$. A sufficient condition for $A\in B({\cal{X}})$ to have SVEP on $Φ_{sf}(A)$ is that its component $Ω_a(A)=\{λ\inΦ_{sf}(A): \rm{ind}(A-λ)\leq 0\}$ is connected. We prove: If $A\in B({\cal{H}})$ is a Hilbert space operator, then a necessary and sufficient condition for there to exist a compact operator $K$ such that $A+K\in{\cal{HP}}$ is that $Ω_a(A)$ is connected.
Given Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$ and operators $A\in B(X)$ and $B\in B(Y)$, property $(gw)$ does not in general transfer from $A$ and $B$ to the tensor product operator $A\otimes B\in B(X\overline{\otimes} Y)$ or to the elementary operator defined by $A$ and $B$, $τ_{AB}=L_AR_B\in B(B(Y,X))$. In this article necessary and sufficient conditions ensuring that property $(gw)$ transfers from $A$ and $B$ to $A\otimes B$ and to $τ_{AB}$ will be given.
A Banach space operator $T\in B(X)$ is left polaroid if for each $λ\in\hbox{iso}σ_a(T)$ there is an integer $d(λ)$ such that asc $(T-λ)=d(λ)<\infty$ and $(T-λ)^{d(λ)+1}X$ is closed; $T$ is finitely left polaroid if asc $(T-λ)<\infty$, $(T-λ)X$ is closed and $\dim(T-λ)^{-1}(0)<\infty$ at each $λ\in\hbox{iso }σ_a(T)$. The left polaroid property transfers from $A$ and $B$ to their tensor product $A\otimes B$, hence also from $A$ and $B^*$ to the left-right multiplication operator $τ_{AB}$, for Hilbert space operators; an additional condition is required for Banach space operators. The finitely left polaroid property transfers from $A$ and $B$ to their tensor product $A\otimes B$ if and only if $0\not\in\hbox{iso}σ_a(A\otimes B)$; a similar result holds for $τ_{AB}$ for finitely left polaroid $A$ and $B^*$.
The main objective of this work is to study generalized Browder's and Weyl's theorems for the multiplication operators $L_A$ and $R_B$ and for the elementary operator $τ_{A,B}=L_AR_B$.
The transfer property for the generalized Browder's theorem both of the tensor product and of the left-right multiplication operator will be characterized in terms of the $B$-Weyl spectrum inclusion. In addition, the isolated points of these two classes of operators will be fully characterized.