BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Athanase Papadopoulos

Athanase Papadopoulos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.HOmath.DGmath.GTmath.CVmath.MGmath.DS

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

On the Lambert conformal conical projection and the general map of the Russian Empire

The problem of drawing geographical maps is the one of mapping a subset of the sphere, representing a country or some other region on the surface of the Earth, into the Euclidean plane, minimising certain distortion properties that are specified in advance. It is known that from the purely mathematical point of view, this is an extremely difficult problem. One of Leonhard Euler's duties during his first stay at the Imperial Academy of Sciences of Saint Petersburg (1727-1741) was to help establishing maps of the Russian Empire. He worked on this project under the direction of the famous French geographer Joseph-Nicolas Delisle, who was the head of the astronomy and geography departments of the Academy. The general map of the Russian Empire, together with several maps of its particular regions were published under Euler's direction in the so-called Russian Atlas in 1745. In his later memoir ``De proiectione geographica De Lisliana in mappa generali imperii russici usitata'', written in 1777, Euler developed the mathematical theory of the method used by Delisle on a heuristic basis, which he himself used for drawing the general map of the Russian Empire. This method usually carries now the name Delisle--Euler map. In a previous paper, the first two authors of the present paper compared the Delisle--Euler map with several other maps of the conical type, with respect to various mathematical distorsion properties. They showed that this map is the best one from all the points of view considered, when it is applied to the drawing of the Russian Empire. In the present paper, we compare the Euler--Delisle map with a map which was not considered in the paper mentioned, namely, the so-called Lambert conformal conical projection, applied to the same region of the Earth. We show that the latter is better in several respects than all the other maps considered in the previous paper, including the Delisle--Euler map.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2024arXiv

The infinitesimal and global Thurston geometry of Teichm{ü}ller space

We undertake a systematic study of the infinitesimal geometry of the Thurston metric, showing that the topology, convex geometry and metric geometry of the tangent and cotangent spheres based at any marked hyperbolic surface representing a point in Teichm{ü}ller space can recover the marking and geometry of this marked surface. We then translate the results concerning the infinitesimal structures to global geometric statements for the Thurston metric, most notably deriving rigidity statements for the Thurston metric analogous to the celebrated Royden theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Some notes on the impact of Lagrange's memoir "On the construction of geographical maps"

These are notes on the impact of Lagrange's memoir on the construction of geographical maps. We mention the relations of some ideas and questions introduced in this memoir with other notions that appeared later in the works of several mathematicians, including in particular Chebyshev (19th c.) and Darboux (19th-20th c.), two mathematicians who were particularly interested in geography.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Clairaut, Euler and the figure of the Earth

The sphericity of the form of the Earth was questioned around the year 1687, primarily, by Isaac Newton who deduced from his theory of universal gravitation that the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the poles and elongated at the equator. In France, somepreeminent geographers were not convinced by Newton's arguments, and about the same period, based on empirical measurements, they emitted another theory, claiming that on the contrary, the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the equator and elongated at the poles. To find the real figure of the Earth became one of the major questions that were investigated by geographers, astronomers, mathematicians and other scientists in the eighteenth century, and the work done around this question had an impact on the development of all these fields. In this paper, we review the work of the eighteenth-century French mathematician, astronomer and geographer Alexis-Claude Clairaut related to the question of the figure of the Earth. We report on the relation between this work and that of Leonhard Euler. At the same time, we comment on the impact of the question of the figure of the Earth on mathematics, astronomy and hydrostatics. Finally, we review some later mathematical developments that are due to various authors that were motivated by this question. It is interesting to see how a question on geography had such an impact on the theoretical sciences. The final version of this paper will appear in Ganita Bh{ā}r{ā}t{ī}, (Indian Mathematics) the Bulletin of the Indian Society for History of Mathematics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Ren{é} Thom: From mathematics to philosophy

I discuss Ren{é} Thom's approach to philosophy based on his mathematical background. At the same time, I will highlight his connection with Aristotle, his criticism of the modern view of science as a predictive process, his ideas on mathematical education, his position with respect to the French school of mathematics that was dominent in his time and his relationship with the philosophical community. I will also touch upon the connections between Thom's ideas and those of Leibniz, Riemann, Freud and others. The last version of this paper will appear as a chapter in the book Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (ed. Bharath Sriraman), Springer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Math{é}matiques, musique et cosmologie : A partir du Tim{é}e de Platon

Based on Plato's Timaeus, we present some reflections on music, cosmology and mathematics and their mutual influence.The article is dedicated to the composer Walter Zimmermann. The final version of this article will appear in the volume "Les jeux subtils de la po{é}tique, des nombres et de la philosophie. Autour de la musique de Walter Zimmermann", ed. P. Michel, M. Andreatta and J.-L. Besada, Hermann, Paris, 2021.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A note on Nicolas-Auguste Tissot: At the origin of quasiconformal mappings (to appear in Vol. VII of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller Theory)

Nicolas-Auguste Tissot (1824--1897) was a French mathematician and cartographer. He introduced a tool which became known among geographers under the name ``Tissot indicatrix'', and which was widely used during the first half of the twentieth century in cartography. This is a graphical representation of a field of ellipses, indicating at each point of a geographical map the distorsion of this map, both in direction and in magnitude. Each ellipse represented at a given point is the image of an infinitesimal circle in the domain of the map (generally speaking, a sphere representing the surface of the earth) by the projection that realizes the geographical map. Tissot studied extensively, from a mathematical viewpoint, the distortion of mappings from the sphere onto the Euclidean plane, and he also developed a theory for the distorsion of mappings between general surfaces. His ideas are close to those that are at the origin of the work on quasiconformal mappings that was developed several decades after him by Gr{ö}tzsch, Lavrentieff, Ahlfors and Teichm{ü}ller. Gr{ö}tzsch, in his papers, mentions the work of Tissot, and in some of the drawings he made for his articles, the Tissot indicatrix is represented. Teichm{ü}ller mentions the name Tissot in a historical section in one of his fundamental papers in which he points out that quasiconformal mappings were initially used by geographers. The name Tissot is missing from all the known historical reports on quasiconformal mappings. In the present article, we report on this work of Tissot, showing that the theory of quasiconformal mappings has a practical origin. The final version of this article will appear in Vol. VII of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller Theory (European Mathematical Society Publishing House, 2020).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Value distribution theory and Teichm{ü}ller's paper "Einfache Beispiele zur Wertverteilungslehre"

This survey will appear in Vol. VII of the Hendbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory (European Mathematical Society Publishing House, 2020). It is a commentary on Teichm{ü}ller's paper "Einfache Beispiele zur Wertverteilungslehre", published in 1944, whose English translation appears in that volume. Together with Teichm{ü}ller's paper, we survey the development of value distribution theory, in the period starting from Gauss's work on the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra and ending with the work of Teichm{ü}ller. We mention the foundational work of several mathematicians, including Picard, Laguerre, Poincar{é}, Hadamard, Borel, Montel, Valiron, and others, and we give a quick overview of the various notions introduced by Nevanlinna and some of his results on that theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access