Paper detail

Clairaut, Euler and the figure of the Earth

The sphericity of the form of the Earth was questioned around the year 1687, primarily, by Isaac Newton who deduced from his theory of universal gravitation that the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the poles and elongated at the equator. In France, somepreeminent geographers were not convinced by Newton's arguments, and about the same period, based on empirical measurements, they emitted another theory, claiming that on the contrary, the Earth has the form of a spheroid flattened at the equator and elongated at the poles. To find the real figure of the Earth became one of the major questions that were investigated by geographers, astronomers, mathematicians and other scientists in the eighteenth century, and the work done around this question had an impact on the development of all these fields. In this paper, we review the work of the eighteenth-century French mathematician, astronomer and geographer Alexis-Claude Clairaut related to the question of the figure of the Earth. We report on the relation between this work and that of Leonhard Euler. At the same time, we comment on the impact of the question of the figure of the Earth on mathematics, astronomy and hydrostatics. Finally, we review some later mathematical developments that are due to various authors that were motivated by this question. It is interesting to see how a question on geography had such an impact on the theoretical sciences. The final version of this paper will appear in Ganita Bh{ā}r{ā}t{ī}, (Indian Mathematics) the Bulletin of the Indian Society for History of Mathematics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.