BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Norbert A'Campo

Norbert A'Campo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.GTmath.AGmath.CVmath.HOalg-geommath.LOmath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
10works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

A Commentary on Teichmüller's paper "Über Extremalprobleme der konformen Geometrie" (On extremal problems in conformal geometry)

We comment on the paper Über Extremalprobleme der konformen Geometrie (On extremal problems in conformal geometry) by Teichmüller, published in 1941. This paper contains ideas on a wide generalization of his previous work on the solution of extremal problems in conformal geometry. The generalization concerns at the same time the fields of function theory, topology and algebra. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichmüller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Actions of the Absolute Galois Group

We review some ideas of Grothendieck and others on actions of the absolute Galois group Γ Q of Q (the automorphism group of the tower of finite extensions of Q), related to the geometry and topology of surfaces (mapping class groups, Teichm{ü}ller spaces and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces). Grothendieck's motivation came in part from his desire to understand the absolute Galois group. But he was also interested in Thurston's work on surfaces, and he expressed this in his Esquisse d'un programme, his R{é}coltes et semailles and on other occasions. He introduced the notions of dessin d'enfant, Teichm{ü}ller tower, and other related objects, he considered the actions of Γ Q on them or on their etale fundamental groups, and he made conjectures on some natural homomorphisms between the absolute Galois group and the automor-phism groups (or outer automorphism groups) of these objects. We mention several ramifications of these ideas, due to various authors. We also report on the works of Sullivan and others on nonlinear actions of Γ Q , in particular in homotopy theory. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On Grothendieck's construction of Teichmüller space

In his 1944 paper Veränderliche Riemannsche Flächen , Teichmüller defined a structure of complex manifold on the set of isomorphism classes of marked closed Riemann surfaces of genus g. The complex manifold he obtained is the space called today Teichmüller space. In the same paper, Teichmüller introduced the so-called universal Teichmüller curve -- a space over Teichmüller space where the fiber above each point is a Riemann surface representing that point. In fact, Teichmüller proved the existence of the Teichmüller curve as a space of Riemann surfaces parametrized by an analytic space, with an existence and uniqueness theorem establishing this analytic structure. This result was later reformulated and proved by Grothendieck in a series of ten lectures he gave at Cartan's seminar in 1960-1961. In his approach , Grothendieck replaced Teichmüller's explicit parameters by a general construction of fiber bundles whose base is an arbitrary analytic space. This work on Teichmüller space led him to recast the bases of analytic geometry using the language of categories and functors. In Grothendieck's words, the Teichmüller curve becomes a space representing a functor from the category of analytic spaces into the category of sets. In this survey, we comment on Grothendieck's series of lectures. The survey is primarily addressed to low-dimensional topologists and geometers. In presenting Grothendieck's results, we tried to explain or rephrase in more simple terms some notions that are usually expressed in the language of algebraic geometry. However, it is not possible to short-circuit the language of categories and functors. The survey is also addressed to those algebraic geometers who wish to know how the notion of moduli space evolved in connection with Teichmüller theory. Explaining the origins of mathematical ideas contributes in dispensing justice to their authors and it usually renders the theory that is surveyed more attractive. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichmüller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On Grothendieck's tame topology

Grothendieck's Esquisse d'un programme is often referred to for the ideas it contains on dessins d'enfants, the Teichm{ü}ller tower, and the actions of the absolute Galois group on these objects or their etale fundamental groups. But this program contains several other important ideas. In particular, motivated by surface topology and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces, Grothendieck calls there for a recasting of topology, in order to make it fit to the objects of semialgebraic and semianalytic geometry, and in particular to the study of the Mumford-Deligne compactifications of moduli spaces. A new conception of manifold, of submanifold and of maps between them is outlined. We review these ideas in the present chapter, because of their relation to the theory of moduli and Te-ichm{ü}ller spaces. We also mention briefly the relations between Grothendieck's ideas and earlier theories developed by Whitney, Lojasiewicz and Hironaka and especially Thom, and with the more recent theory of o-minimal structures. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the early history of moduli and Teichm{ü}ller spaces

We survey some major contributions to Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{ü}ller space. Our report has a historical character, but the stress is on the chain of mathematical ideas. We start with the introduction of Riemann surfaces, and we end with the discovery of some of the basic structures of Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{ü}ller space. We point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many algebraic geometers and analysts working in the theory. The period we are interested in starts with Riemann, in 1851, and ends in the early 1960s, when Ahlfors and Bers confirmed that Teichm{ü}ller's results were correct.This paper was written for the book "Lipman Bers, a life in Mathematics," edited by Linda Keen , Irwin Kra and Rubi Rodriguez (Amercian Mathematical Society, 2015). It is dedicated to the memory of Lipman Bers who was above all a complex analyst and spent a large part of his life and energy working on the analytic structure of Teichm{ü}ller space. His work on analysis is nevertheless inseparable from geometry and topology. In this survey, we highlight the relations and the logical dependence between this work and the works of Riemann, Poincar{é}, Klein, Brouwer, Siegel, Teichm{ü}ller, Weil, Grothendieck and others. We explain the motivation behind the ideas. In doing so, we point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many Teichm{ü}ller theorists.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Commentary on Teichm{ü}ller's paper ``Bestimmung der extremalen quasikonformen Abbildungen bei geschlossenen orientierten Riemannschen Fl{ä}chen''

This is a mathematical commentary on Teichm{ü}ller's paper ``Bestimmung der extremalen quasikonformen Abbildungen bei geschlossenen orientierten Riemannschen Fl{ä}chen'' (Determination of extremal quasiconformal maps of closed oriented Riemann surfaces). This paper is among the last (and may be the last one) that Teichm{ü}ller wrote on the theory of moduli. It contains the proof of the so-called Teichm{ü}ller existence theorem for a closed surface of genus at least 2. For this proof, the author defines a mapping between a space of equivalence classes of marked Riemann surfaces (the Teichm{ü}ller space) and a space of equivalence classes of certain Fuchsian groups (the so-called Fricke space). After that, he defines a map between the latter and the Euclidean space of dimension 6g-6 Using Brouwer's theorem of invariance of domain, he shows that this map is a homeomorphism. This involves in particular a careful definition of the topologies of Fricke space, the computation of its dimension, and comparison results between hyperbolic distance and quasiconformal dilatation. The use of the invariance of domain theorem is in the spirit of Poincar{é} and Klein's use of the so-called ``continuity principle'' in their attempts to prove the uniformization theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Klein's So-called Non-Euclidean geometry

In two papers titled "On the so-called non-Euclidean geometry", I and II, Felix Klein proposed a construction of the spaces of constant curvature -1, 0 and and 1 (that is, hyperbolic, Euclidean and spherical geometry) within the realm of projective geometry. Klein's work was inspired by ideas of Cayley who derived the distance between two points and the angle between two planes in terms of an arbitrary fixed conic in projective space. We comment on these two papers of Klein and we make relations with other works.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Transitional geometry

We develop a transitional geometry, that is, a family of geometries of constant curvatures which makes a continuous connec-tion between the hyperbolic, Euclidean and spherical geometries. In this transitional setting, several geometric entities like points, lines, dis-tances, triangles, angles, area, curvature, etc. as well as trigonometric formulae and other properties transit in a continuous manner from one geometry to another. AMS classification: 01-99 ; 53-02 ; 53-03 ; 53A35.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A commentary on Teichmüller's paper "Veränderliche Riemannsche Flächen" (Variable Riemann Surfaces)

This is a commentary on Teichmüllers' paper "Veränderliche Riemannsche Flächen" (Variable Riemann Surfaces), published in 1944. This paper is the last one that Teichmüller wrote on the problem of moduli. At most places the paper contains ideas and no technical details. The author presents a completely new approach to Teichmüller space, compared to the approach he took in his first seminal paper "Extremale quasikonforme Abbildungen und quadratische Differentiale" and its sequel "Bestimmung der extremalen quasikonformen Abbildungen bei geschlossenen orientierten Riemannschen Flächen" in which he completed some of the the results stated in the former. In the paper "Extremale quasikonforme ...", Teichmüller led the foundations of what we call today Teichmüller theory (but without the complex structure), defining its metric and introducing in that theory the techniques of quasiconformal mappings and of quadratic differentials as essential tools. In the present paper, the approach is more abstract, through complex analytic geometry. Teichmüller space, equipped with its complex-analytic structure, is characterized here by a certain universal property. Among the other ideas and results contained in the paper, we mention the following: (1) The existence and uniqueness of the universal Teichmüller curve, rediscovered later on by Ahlfors and by Bers. At the same time, this introduced the first fibre bundle over Teichmüller space. (2) The proof of the fact that the automorphisms group of the univeral Teichmüller curve is the extended mapping class group. (3) The idea of a fine moduli space. (4) The idea of using the period map to define a complex structure on Teichmüller space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Geometry of plane curves via Tschirnhausen resolution tower

We show the existence of toric resolution tower for an irreducible curve singularity which is explicitly described by Tschirnhausen polynomials. We deduce for a smooth affine plane curve from its topology restrictions for its singularity at infinity. For instance, we discribe the singularities at infinity (up to equisingular deformation) for curves of genus 0,1 and 2. From this follows an extension of the Abhyankar-Moh-Suzuki theorem to genus 1 and 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access