BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ashok K. Singal

Ashok K. Singal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COphysics.class-phastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.EPphysics.gen-phphysics.pop-phastro-ph.IMgr-qcphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
32works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

32 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Peculiar motion of Solar system from the Hubble diagram of supernovae Ia and its implications for cosmology

Peculiar motion of the solar system, determined from the dipole anisotropy in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR), has given a velocity $370$ km s$^{-1}$ along RA$=168^{\circ}$, Dec$=-7^{\circ}$. Subsequent peculiar motion determinations from the number counts, sky brightness or redshift dipoles observed in large samples of distant radio galaxies and quasars yielded peculiar velocities two to ten times larger than CMBR, though in all cases the directions matched with the CMBR dipole. Here we introduce a novel technique for determining the peculiar motion from the magnitude-redshift ($m_{\rm B}-z$) Hubble diagram of Type Ia Supernovae (SN Ia), one of the best standard candles available. We find a peculiar velocity $1.6\pm 0.5 \times 10^3$ km s$^{-1}$, larger than the CMBR value roughly by a factor of four, along RA$=173^{\circ}\pm12^{\circ}$, Dec$=10^{\circ}\pm9^{\circ}$, the direction being within $\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}2σ$ of the CMBR dipole. Since a genuine solar motion would not depend upon the method or the dataset employed, large discrepancies seen among various dipole amplitudes could imply that these dipoles, including the CMBR one, might not pertain to observer&#39;s peculiar motion. However, a common direction for various dipoles might indicate a preferred direction in the universe, implying an intrinsic anisotropy, in violation of the cosmological principle, a cornerstone of the modern cosmology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Solar system peculiar motion from the Hubble diagram of quasars and testing the Cosmological Principle

We determine here peculiar motion of the Solar system, first time from the $m-z$ Hubble diagram of quasars. Observer&#39;s peculiar motion causes a systematic shift in the $m-z$ plane between sources lying along the velocity vector and those in the opposite direction, providing a measure of the peculiar velocity. Accordingly, from a sample of $\sim 1.2 \times 10^5$ mid-infrared quasars with measured spectroscopic redshifts, we arrive at a peculiar velocity $\sim 22$ times larger than that from the CMBR dipole, but direction matching within $\sim 2σ$. Previous findings from number count, sky brightness or redshift dipoles observed in samples of distant AGNs or SNe Ia too had yielded values two to ten times larger than the CMBR value, %but this by far is the largest value arrived at for the peculiar motion, though the direction in all cases agreed with the CMBR dipole. Since a genuine solar peculiar velocity cannot vary from one dataset to the other, an order of magnitude, statistically significant, discordant dipoles, might imply that we may instead have to look for some other cause for the genesis of these dipole, including that of the CMBR. At the same time, a common direction for all these dipoles, determined from completely independent surveys by different groups employing different techniques, might indicate that these dipoles are not resulting from some systematics in the observations or in the data analysis, but could instead suggest a preferred direction in the Universe due to an inherent anisotropy, which, in turn, would be against the Cosmological Principle (CP), the most basic tenet of the modern cosmology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Implications of a non-zero Poynting flux at infinity sans radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge

We study in detail the electromagnetic fields and the Poynting flux in the case of a uniformly accelerated charge, in order to examine whether such a charge does `emit&#39; radiation, especially in view of the widely accepted fact that there is no radiation reaction on the charge. Our concern, in particular, is with the Poynting flow computed at large distances (approaching infinity!) from the time-retarded positions of uniformly accelerated charge, and taken as an evidence of radiation emitted by the charge, which we shall demonstrate to be not true. As the charge picks up speed due to a constant acceleration, the energy in its self-fields accordingly increases and the Poynting flow, usually inferred as radiation, actually forms part of the requisite energy being fed into fields, at a rate just sufficient to match the increasing energy in its self-fields at various distances from the uniformly accelerated charge, including that in the far-off regions. In fact, for the decelerating charge, the energy in its self-fields decreases, at all distances from the charge, till it comes to momentary rest with no energy in its transverse fields, and this decrease in energy is shown {\em everywhere} by an inward radial flow of the Poynting vector, toward the `present&#39; position of the decelerating charge. Moreover, there is a convective flow of self-fields of the charge, seen as a Poynting flow component always along the `present&#39; direction of motion of the charge. Further, we shall show that effectively the electromagnetic fields, including the acceleration fields, even when they are at large distances from the time-retarded position of the charge, they continue to be all around the `present&#39; position of the charge which itself is moving toward infinity due to the uniform acceleration.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Our Peculiar Motion Inferred from Number Counts of Mid Infra Red AGNs and the Discordance Seen with the Cosmological Principle

The dipole anisotropy in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) has given a peculiar velocity vector 370 km s$^{-1}$ along $l=264^\circ,b=48^\circ$. However, some other dipoles, for instance, from the number counts, sky brightness or redshift distributions in large samples of distant Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), have yielded values of the peculiar velocity many times larger than that from the CMBR, though surprisingly, in all cases the directions agreed with the CMBR dipole. Here we determine our peculiar motion from a sample of ~0.28 million AGNs, selected from the Mid Infra Red Active Galactic Nuclei (MIRAGN) sample comprising more than a million sources. From this, we find a peculiar velocity, which is more than four times the CMBR value, although the direction seems to be within $\sim 2σ$ of the CMBR dipole. A genuine value of the solar peculiar velocity should be the same irrespective of the data or the technique employed to estimate it. Therefore, such discordant dipole amplitudes, might mean that the explanation for these dipoles, including that of the CMBR, might in fact be something else. But, the observed fact that the direction in all cases, is the same, though obtained from completely independent surveys using different instruments and techniques, by different sets of people employing different computing routines, might nonetheless indicate that these dipoles are not merely due to some systematics, otherwise why would they all be pointing along the same direction. It might instead suggest a preferred direction in the Universe, implying a genuine anisotropy, which would violate the Cosmological Principle, the core of the modern cosmology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Determining planetary positions in the sky for $\pm 50$ years to an accuracy of $\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}} 1^{\circ}$ with a calculator}

In this paper, we describe a very simple method to calculate the positions of the planets in the sky. The technique used enables us to calculate planetary positions to an accuracy of $\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}} 1^{\circ}$ for $\pm 50$ years from the starting epoch. Moreover, this involves very simple calculations and can be done using a calculator. All we need are the initial specifications of planetary orbits for some standard epoch and the time periods of their revolutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

GMRT observations of IC 711 -- The longest head-tail radio galaxy known

We present low-frequency, GMRT observations at 240, 610 and 1300 MHz of IC~711, a narrow angle tail (NAT) radio galaxy. The total angular extent of the radio emission, $\sim 22$ arcmin, corresponds to a projected linear size of $\sim 900$ kpc, making it the longest among the known head-tail radio galaxies. The objectives of the GMRT observations were to investigate the radio morphology, especially of the long tail structure, at low frequencies. The radio structure, especially initial $\sim 10$ arcmin of tail being a long straight feature, does not seem to be consistent with a simple circular motion around the cluster centre, as previously suggested in the literature. Two sharp bends after the straight section of the tail cast doubt on the prevailing idea in the literature that the long narrow tails represent trails left behind by the fast moving parent optical galaxy with respect to the cluster medium, as the optical galaxy could not have undergone such sharp bends in its path, under any conceivable gravitational influence of some individual galaxy or of the overall cluster gravitational potential. In fact the tail does not seem to have been influenced by the gravitational field of any of the cluster-member galaxies. The radio spectrum of the head, coinciding with the optical galaxy, is flat ($α\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}0.4$ for $S \propto ν^{-α}$), but steadily steepens along the radio tail, with the end part of the tail showing the steepest spectrum ($α\, {\sim}$ 4 -- 5) ever seen in any diffuse radio emission region.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Is Interstellar travel to an exoplanet Possible?

It is shown that space travel, even in the most distant future, will remain confined to our own planetary system, and a similar conclusion will hold forth for any other civilization, no matter how advanced it might be, unless those extra-terrestrial species have life spans order of magnitude longer than ours. Even in such a case it is unlikely that they will travel much farther than their immediate stellar neighbourhood, as each such excursion will exhaust the resources of their home planet so much that those will dwindle rather fast and there might not be much left for the further scientific and technological advancements. So the science-fiction fancy of a &#34;Galactic Empire&#34; may ever remain in our fantasies only. And as for the mythical UFOs, whose quiet appearances do get reported in the press once in a while, recent explorations have shown no evidence that any such thing could have an origination within our own solar system itself. And a &#34;quiet trip&#34; back and forth from a distant star is almost impossible as the exhaust in any such trip will dazzle the sky like another sun or perhaps more like a gamma ray burst occurring but not in a distant part of the universe instead going off right in our own solar backyard.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

The fallacy of Schott energy-momentum

The incompatibility between Larmor&#39;s formula for radiation losses (at a rate proportional to square of the acceleration of the electric charge) and the radiation reaction (the rate of loss of momentum of the accelerated charge proportional to its rate of change of acceleration) was recently shown to arise because a proper distinction is not kept between radiation losses calculated in terms of a retarded time and those expressed in terms of a &#34;real time&#34;. However, the occurrence of this disparity between two formulations is usually reconciled in literature by proposing an acceleration-dependent Schott energy lying somewhere in the nearby electromagnetic fields of an accelerated charge. But nobody has yet unambiguously demonstrated where the Schott energy actually lies in the fields. By scrutinizing electromagnetic fields of a uniformly accelerated charge, a mathematically tractable case, we show that contrary to the ideas prevalent in the literature, there is no evidence of any acceleration-dependent Schott energy-momentum in the electromagnetic fields, anywhere in the near vicinity of the charge or elsewhere. Accordingly, we expose the fallacy of the Schott energy-momentum term, which should henceforth be abandoned, in the electromagnetic radiation formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Do the standard expressions for the electromagnetic field-momentum need any modifications?

We investigate here the question raised in literature about the correct expression for the electromagnetic field-momentum, especially when static fields are involved. For this we examine a couple of simple but intriguing cases. First we consider a system configuration in which electromagnetic field momentum is present even though the system is static. We trace the electromagnetic momentum to be present in the form of a continuous transport of electromagnetic energy from one part of the system to another, without causing any net change in the energy of the system. In a second case we show that the electromagnetic momentum is nil irrespective of whether the charged system is stationary or in motion, even though the electromagnetic energy is present throughout. We demonstrate that the conventional formulation of electromagnetic field-momentum describes the systems consistently without any real contradictions. Here we also make exposition of a curiosity where electromagnetic energy decreases when the charged system gains velocity. Then we discuss the more general question that has been raised -- Are the conventional formulas for energy-momentum of electromagnetic fields valid for all cases? Or more specifically, in the case of so-called &#34;bound fields,&#34; do we need to change over to some modified definitions which have made their appearance even in standard text books? We show that in all cases it is only the conventional formulas which lead to results consistent with the rest of physics, including the special theory of relativity, and that any proposed modifications are thus superfluous.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Poynting flux in the neighbourhood of a point charge in arbitrary motion and the radiative power losses

We examine the electromagnetic fields in the neighbourhood of a &#34;point charge&#34; in arbitrary motion and thereby determine the Poynting flux across a spherical surface of vanishingly small radius surrounding the charge. We show that the radiative power losses from a point charge turn out to be proportional to the scalar product of the instantaneous velocity and the first time-derivative of the acceleration of the charge. This may seem to be in discordance with the familiar Larmor&#39;s formula where the instantaneous power radiated from a charge is proportional to the square of acceleration. However, it seems that the root cause of the discrepancy actually lies in the Larmor&#39;s formula which is derived using the acceleration fields but without a due consideration for the Poynting flux associated with the velocity-dependent self-fields &#34;co-moving&#34; with the charge. Further, while deriving Larmor&#39;s formula one equates the Poynting flux through a surface at some later time to the radiation loss by the enclosed charge at the retarded time. Poynting&#39;s theorem, on the other hand, relates the outgoing radiation flux from a closed surface to the rate of energy decrease within the enclosed volume, all calculated {\em for the same given instant} only. Here we explicitly show the absence of any Poynting flux in the neighbourhood of an instantly stationary point charge, implying no radiative losses from such a charge, which is in complete conformity with energy conservation. We further show how Larmor&#39;s formula is still able to serve our purpose in vast majority of cases. It is further shown that Larmor&#39;s formula in general violates momentum conservation and in the case of synchrotron radiation leads to a potentially wrong conclusion about the pitch angle changes of the radiating charges, and that only the radiation reaction formula yields a correct result, consistent with the special relativity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Radiation reaction and the pitch angle changes for a charge undergoing synchrotron losses

In the derivation of synchrotron radiation formulas it has been assumed that the pitch angle of a charge remains constant during the radiation process. However from the radiation reaction formula, while the component of the velocity vector perpendicular to the magnetic field reduces in magnitude due to radiative losses, the parallel component does not undergo any change during radiation. Therefore there is a change in the ratio of the two components, implying a change in the pitch angle. We derive the exact formula for the change in energy of radiating electrons by taking into account the change of the pitch angle due to radiative losses. From this we derive the characteristic decay time of synchrotron electrons over which they turn from highly relativistic into mildly relativistic ones.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Relativistic Doppler beaming and misalignments in AGN jets

Radio maps of AGNs often show linear features, called jets, both on pc as well as kpc scales. These jets supposedly possess relativistic motion and are oriented close to the line of sight of the observer and accordingly the relativistic Doppler beaming makes them look much brighter than they really are in their respective rest-frames. The flux boosting due to the relativistic beaming is a very sensitive factor of the jet orientation angle, as seen by the observer. Quite often large bends are seen in these jets, with misalignments being $90^\circ$ or more and might imply a change in the orientation angle that could cause a large change in the relativistic beaming factor. Such large bends should show high contrasts in the brightness of the jets, before and after the misalignments, if relativistic beaming does play an important role in these jets. It needs to be kept in mind that sometimes a small intrinsic change in the jet angle might appear as a much larger misalignment due to the geometrical projection effects, especially when seen close to the line of sight. Of course what really matters is the final orientation angle of the jet with respect to the observer&#39;s line of sight. Taking the geometrical projection effects properly into account, we calculate the consequences of the presumed relativistic beaming and demonstrate that there ought to be large brightness ratios in jets before and after the observed misalignments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The pitch angle paradox and radiative life times in a synchrotron source

In synchrotron radiation there is a paradox whether or not the pitch angle of a radiating charge varies. The conventional wisdom is that the pitch angle does not change during the radiation process. The argument is based on Larmor&#39;s radiation formula, where in a synchrotron case the radiation power is along the instantaneous direction of motion of the charge. Then the momentum loss will also be parallel to that direction and therefore the pitch angle of the charge would remain unaffected. The accordingly derived formulas for energy losses of synchrotron electrons in radio galaxies are the standard text-book material for the last 50 years. However, if we use the momentum transformation laws from special relativity, then we find that the pitch angle of a radiating charge varies. While the velocity component parallel to the magnetic field remains unaffected, the perpendicular component does reduce in magnitude due to radiative losses, implying a change in the pitch angle. This apparent paradox is resolved when effects on the charge motion are calculated not from Larmor&#39;s formula but from Lorentz&#39;s radiation reaction formula. We derive the exact formulation by taking into account the change of the pitch angle due to radiative losses. From this we first time derive the characteristic decay time of synchrotron electrons over which they turn from highly relativistic into mildly relativistic ones.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Compatibility of Larmor&#39;s formula with radiation reaction for a radiating charge

It is shown that the well-known disparity in classical electrodynamics between the power losses calculated from the radiation reaction and that from Larmor&#39;s formula, is succinctly understood when a proper distinction is made between quantities expressed in terms of a &#34;real time&#34; and those expressed in terms of a retarded time. It is explicitly shown that an accelerated charge, taken to be a sphere of vanishingly small radius $r_{\rm o} $, experiences at any time a self-force proportional to the acceleration it had at a time $r_{\rm o} /c$ earlier, while the rate of work done on the charge is obtained by a scalar product of the self-force with the instantaneous (present) value of its velocity. Now if the retarded value of acceleration is expressed in terms of the present values of acceleration, then we get the rate of work done according to the radiation reaction equation, however if we instead express the present value of velocity in terms of its time-retarded value, then we get back the familiar Larmor&#39;s radiation formula. From this simple relation between the two we show that they differ because Larmor&#39;s formula, in contrast with the radiation reaction, is written not in terms of the real-time values of quantities specifying the charge motion but is instead expressed in terms of the time-retarded values. Moreover, it is explicitly shown that the difference in the two formulas for radiative power loss exactly matches the difference in the temporal rate of the change of energy in the self-fields between the retarded and real times. From this it becomes obvious that the ad hoc introduction of an acceleration-dependent energy term, usually referred to in the prevalent literature as Schott-term, in order to make the two formulas comply with each other, is redundant.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Cosmological Parallax--Distance Formula

The standard cosmological parallax--distance formula, as found in the literature, including text-books and reference books on cosmology, requires a correction. This correction stems from the fact that in the standard text-book derivation it has been ignored that any chosen baseline in a gravitationally bound system does not partake in the cosmological expansion. Though the correction is available in the literature for some time, the text-books still continue to use the older, incorrect formula, and its full implications are not yet fully realized. Apart from providing an alternate correct, closed-form expression that is more suitable and convenient for computations for certain limiting cases of FRW ($Λ=0$) world models, we also demonstrate how one can compute parallax distance for the currently favored flat-space accelerating-universe ($Λ>0, k=0$) cosmologies. Further, we show that the correction in parallax distance at large redshifts could amount to a factor of three or even more. Moreover, even in an infinite universe the parallax distance does not increase indefinitely with redshift and that even the farthest possible observable point may have a finite parallax angle, a factor that needs to be carefully taken into account when using distant objects as the background field against which the parallax of a foreground object is to be measured. Some other complications that could arise in parallax measurements of a distant source, like that due to the deflection of incoming light by the gravitation field of the Sun and other planetary bodies in the solar system, are pointed out.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Paradox of Two Charged Capacitors -- A New Perspective

It is shown that the famous paradox of two charged capacitors is successfully resolved if all the energy changes in the system are properly considered when some of the charges are transferred from one capacitor to the other. It happens so even when the connecting wire has an identically zero resistance, giving rise to no Ohmic losses in the wire. It is shown that in such a case the &#34;missing energy&#34; goes into the kinetic energy of conducting charges. It is shown that radiation plays no significant role in resolving the paradox. The problem can be formulated and successfully resolved in a novel form, where the capacitance of the system is increased by stretching the plates of the original capacitor, without involving any connecting wires in a circuit. There is an outward self-force due to mutual repulsion among charges stored within each capacitor plate, and the work done by these self-forces during an expansion is indeed equal to the missing energy of the capacitor system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A large anisotropy in the sky distribution of 3CRR quasars and other radio galaxies

We report the presence of large anisotropies in the sky distributions of powerful extended quasars as well as some other sub-classes of radio galaxies in the 3CRR survey, the most reliable and most intensively studied complete sample of strong steep-spectrum radio sources. The anisotropies lie about a plane passing through the equinoxes and the north celestial pole. Out of a total of 48 quasars in the sample, 33 of them lie in one half of the observed sky and the remaining 15 in the other half. The probability that in a random distribution of 3CRR quasars in the sky, statistical fluctuations could give rise to an asymmetry in observed numbers up to this level is only $\sim 1\%$. Also only about 1/4th of Fanaroff-Riley 1 (FR1) type of radio galaxies lie in the first half of the observed sky and the remainder in the second half. If we include all the observed asymmetries in the sky distributions of quasars and radio galaxies in the 3CRR sample, the probability of their occurrence by a chance combination reduces to $\sim 2 \times 10^{-5}$. Two pertinent but disturbing questions that could be raised here are -- firstly why should there be such large anisotropies present in the sky distribution of some of the strongest and most distant discrete sources, implying inhomogeneities in the universe at very large scales (covering a fraction of the universe)? Secondly why should such anisotropies lie about a great circle decided purely by the orientation of earth&#39;s rotation axis and/or the axis of its revolution around the sun? Are these alignments a mere coincidence or do they imply that these axes have a preferential placement in the larger scheme of things, implying an apparent breakdown of the Copernican principle or its more generalization, cosmological principle, upon which the standard cosmological model is based upon?

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Comment on &#34;Cosmic radio dipole from NVSS and WENSS&#34;

We show that a recent purported correction to the effects of Doppler boosting of flux density in an erstwhile published formula for calculating the observer&#39;s motion from the cosmic radio dipole in sky brightness is erroneous. The thereby computed downward correction in the estimated magnitude for the observer&#39;s motion needs to be scrapped and the results derived therefore need to be reverted back to their erstwhile values.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Dependence of Fanaroff--Riley break of radio galaxies on luminosity and redshift

We investigate the dependence of the Fanaroff-Riley (FR) 1/2 dichotomy of radio galaxies on their luminosities and redshifts. Because of a very strong redshift-luminosity correlation (Malmquist bias) in a flux-limited sample, any redshift-dependent effect could appear as a luminosity related effect and vice versa. A question could then arise - do all the morphological differences seen in the two classes (FR 1 and 2 types) of sources, usually attributed to the differences in their luminosities, could as well be primarily a redshift-dependent effect? A sharp break in luminosity, seen among the two classes, could after all reflect a sharp redshift-dependence due to a rather critical ambient density value at some cosmic epoch. A doubt on these lines does not seem to have been raised in past and things have never been examined with this particular aspect in mind. We want to ascertain the customary prevalent view in the literature that the systematic differences in the two broad morphology types of FR 1 and 2 radio galaxies are indeed due to the differences in their luminosities, and not due to a change in redshift. Here we investigate the dependence of FR 1/2 dichotomy of radio galaxies on luminosity and redshift by using the 3CR sample, where the FR 1/2 dichotomy was first seen, supplemented by data from an additional sample (MRC), that goes about a factor of 5 or more deeper in flux-density than the original 3CR sample. This lets us compare sources with similar luminosities but at different redshifts as well as examine sources at similar redshifts but with different luminosities, thereby allowing us a successful separation of the otherwise two intricately entangled effects. We find that the morphology type is not directly related to redshift and the break between the two types of morphologies seems to depend only upon the radio luminosity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Discordance of the unified scheme with observed properties of quasars and high-excitation galaxies in the 3CRR sample

We examine the consistency of the unified scheme of FR II-type radio galaxies and quasars with their observed number and size distributions in the 3CRR sample. We separate the low-excitation galaxies from the high-excitation ones, as the former might not harbor a quasar within and thus may not be partaking in the unified scheme models. In the updated 3CRR sample, at low redshifts (z<0.5), the relative number and luminosity distributions of high-excitation galaxies and quasars do roughly match the expectations from the orientation-based unified scheme model. However, a foreshortening in the observed sizes of quasars, a must in the orientation-based model, is not seen with respect to radio galaxies even when the low-excitation galaxies are excluded. This dashes the hope that the unified scheme might still work if one includes only the high-excitation galaxies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Energy conservation for a radiating charge in classical electrodynamics

It is shown that the well-known disparity in classical electrodynamics between the power radiated in electromagnetic fields and the power-loss, as calculated from the radiation reaction on a charge undergoing a non-uniform motion, is successfully resolved when a proper distinction is made between quantities expressed in terms of a &#34;real time&#34; and those expressed in terms of a retarded time. It is shown that the expression for the real-time radiative power loss from a charged particle is somewhat different from the familiar Larmor&#39;s formula, or in a relativistic case, from Liénard&#39;s formula.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Fanaroff-Riley dichotomy of radio galaxies and the Malmquist bias

We examine the possibility that a claimed dependence of the FR 1/2 break value in radio luminosity on the absolute magnitude of the optical host galaxy could be due to the Malmquist bias, where a redshift-luminosity correlation appears in a flux-limited sample because of an observational selection effect. In such a sample, the redshift dependence of a phenomenon could appear as a luminosity-dependent effect and may not be really representing an intrinsic property of the radio sample. We test this on the radio complete MRC (Molonglo Reference Catalog) sample, where Spearman rank correlation and Kendall rank correlation tests show that the correlations are indeed stronger between the redshift and the optical luminosity than that between the radio luminosity and the optical luminosity, suggesting that the latter correlation perhaps arises because of the Malmquist Bias. We further show that similar effects of the Malmquist bias could also be present elsewhere in other correlations claimed in the literature between the radio luminosity and other observed properties of FR1 and FR2 sources.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Life on a tidally-locked planet

A tidally-locked planet in its orbit around a star keeps the same face towards the star. This happens when the rotation period of the planet around its own axis becomes equal to its revolution period around the star. Many questions then arise. What gives rise to a tidal locking? Are there any tidally-locked planets somewhere? What will be the atmospheric system of a tidally-locked planet? Could life be sustained on a tidally-locked planet? What will be a sort of DAY in the life of a denizen of a tidally-locked planet? We dwell on these questions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Incongruity of the unified scheme with a 3CRR-like equatorial strong-source sample

We examine the consistency of the unified scheme of the powerful extragalactic radio sources with the 408 MHz BRL sample from the equatorial sky region, selected at the same flux-density level as the 3CRR sample. We find that, unlike in the 3CRR sample, a foreshortening in the observed sizes of quasars, expected from the orientation-based unified scheme model, is not seen in the BRL sample, at least in different redshift bins up to z~1. Even the quasar fraction in individual redshift bins up to z~1 does not match with that expected from the unified scheme, where radio galaxies and quasars are supposed to belong to a common parent population at all redshifts. This not only casts strong doubts on the unified scheme, but also throws up an intriguing result that in a sample selected from the equatorial sky region, using almost the same criteria as in the 3CRR sample from the northern hemisphere, the relative distribution of radio galaxies and quasars differs qualitatively from the 3CRR sample.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Unification scheme of radio galaxies and quasars falsified by their observed size distributions

In the currently popular orientation-based unified scheme, a radio galaxy appears as a quasar when its principal radio-axis happens to be oriented within a certain cone opening angle around the observer&#39;s line of sight. Due to geometrical projection, the observed sizes of quasars should therefore appear smaller than those of radio galaxies. We show that this simple, unambiguous prediction of the unified scheme is not borne out by the actually observed angular sizes of radio galaxies and quasars. Except in the original 3CR sample, based on which the unified scheme was proposed, in other much larger samples no statistically significant difference is apparent in the size distributions of radio galaxies and quasars. The population of low-excitation radio galaxies with apparently no hidden quasars inside, which might explain the observed excess number of radio galaxies at low redshifts, cannot still account for the absence of any foreshortening of the sizes of quasars at large redshifts. On the other hand from infrared and X-ray studies there is evidence of hidden quasar within a dusty torus in many RGs, at $z>0.5$. It seems difficult how to reconcile this with the absence of foreshortening of quasar sizes at even these redshifts, and perhaps one has to allow that the major radio axis may not have anything to do with the optical axis of the torus. Otherwise to resolve the dichotomy of radio galaxies and quasars, a scheme quite different from the present might be required.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Comment on &#34;Exact Expression for Radiation of an Accelerated Charge in Classical Electrodynamics&#34;

It is shown that a newly derived &#34;exact expression&#34; for radiation of an accelerated charge in the recent literature is simply incorrect, having arisen because of a wrong relativistic transformation of the distance parameter. The ensuing claim that the newly derived expression alone that satisfies the energy conservation for the electromagnetic radiation, is based on a wrong reasoning where a proper distinction between the time during which the radiation is received and the time for emission (retarded time of the charge) was not maintained.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Giant pulse emission from PSR B0950+08

We present here the detection of giant-pulse emission from PSR B0950+08, a normal-period pulsar. The observations, made at 103 MHz and lasting for about ten months, have shown on a number of days the frequency of occurrence of giant pulses to be the highest among the known pulsars. The flux--density level of successive giant pulses fluctuates rapidly and their occurrence rates within a day&#39;s observations as well as between neighboring days show large variations. While on some days PSR B0950+08 shows a large number of giant pulses, there are other days when it shows only &#34;quasi-nulls&#34; with no detectable emission in the power spectrum or in the folded pulse data. The cumulative intensity distribution of these giant pulses appears to follow a power law, with index -2.2. After eliminating instrumental, ionospheric, interplanetary and interstellar diffractive and refractive scintillation effects as the cause, it appears that these intensity variations are intrinsic to the pulsar. We suggest that the giant pulse emission and nulling may be opposite manifestations of the same physical process, in the former case an enhanced number of charges partaking in the coherent radiation process giving rise to an extremely high intensity while in the latter case the coherence could be minimal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Gyro-orbit size, brightness temperature limit and implausibility of coherent emission by bunching in synchrotron radio sources

We show that an upper limit on the maximum brightness temperature for a self-absorbed incoherent synchrotron radio source is obtained from the size of its gyro orbits, which in turn must lie well within the confines of the total source extent. These temperature limits are obtained without recourse to inverse Compton effects or the condition of equipartition of energy between magnetic fields and relativistic particles. For radio variables, the intra-day variability (IDV) implies brightness temperatures $\sim 10^{19}$ K in the co-moving rest frame of the source. This, if interpreted purely due to an incoherent synchrotron emission, would imply gyro radii $>10^{28}$ cm, the size of the universe, while from the causality arguments the inferred maximum size of the source in such a case is $\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}} 10^{15}$ cm. Such high brightness temperatures are sometimes modeled in the literature as some coherent emission process where bunches of non-thermal particles are somehow formed that radiate in phase. We show that, unlike in case of curvature radiation models proposed in pulsars, in the synchrotron radiation mechanism the oppositely charged particles would contribute together to the coherent phenomenon without the need to form separate bunches of the opposite charges. At the same time we show that bunches would disperse over dimensions larger than a wavelength in time shorter than the gyro orbital period ($\stackrel{<}{_{\sim}}0.1$ sec). Therefore a coherent emission by bunches cannot be a plausible explanation of the high brightness temperatures inferred in extragalactic radio sources showing variability over a few hours or longer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

An ab initio derivation of the electromagnetic fields of a point charge in arbitrary motion

Electromagnetic fields of an accelerated charge are derived from the first principles using Coulomb&#39;s law and the relativistic transformations. The electric and magnetic fields are derived first for an instantaneous rest frame of the accelerated charge, without making explicit use of Gauss&#39;s law, an approach different from that available in the literature. Thereafter we calculate the electromagnetic fields for an accelerated charge having a non-relativistic motion. The expressions for these fields, supposedly accurate only to a first order in velocity $β$, surprisingly yield all terms exactly for the acceleration fields, only missing a factor $1-β^2$ in the velocity fields. The derivation explicitly shows the genesis of various terms in the field expressions, when expressed with respect to the time retarded position of the charge. A straightforward transformation from the instantaneous rest frame, using relativistic Doppler factors, yields expressions of the electromagnetic fields for the charge moving with an arbitrary velocity. The field expressions are derived without using Liénard-Wiechert potentials, thereby avoiding evaluation of any spatial or temporal derivatives of these potentials at the retarded time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Large peculiar motion of the solar system from the dipole anisotropy in sky brightness due to distant radio sources

According to the cosmological principle, the Universe should appear isotropic, without any preferred directions, to an observer whom we may consider to be fixed in the co-moving co-ordinate system of the expanding Universe. Such an observer is stationary with respect to the average distribution of the matter in the Universe and the sky brightness at any frequency should appear uniform in all directions to such an observer. However a peculiar motion of such an observer, due to a combined effect of Doppler boosting and aberration, will introduce a dipole anisotropy in the observed sky brightness; in reverse an observed dipole anisotropy in the sky brightness could be used to infer the peculiar velocity of the observer with respect to the average Universe. We determine the peculiar velocity of the solar system relative to the frame of distant radio sources, by studying the anisotropy in the sky brightness from discrete radio sources, i.e., an integrated emission from discrete sources per unit solid angle. Our results give a direction of the velocity vector in agreement with the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) value, but the magnitude ($\sim 1600\pm 400$ km/s) is $\sim 4$ times the CMBR value ($369\pm 1$ km/s) at a statistically significant ($\sim 3σ$) level. A genuine difference between the two dipoles would imply anisotropic Universe, with the anisotropy changing with the epoch. This would violate the cosmological principle where the isotropy of the Universe is assumed for all epochs, and on which the whole modern cosmology is based upon.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Maximum brightness temperature for an incoherent synchrotron radio source

We discuss here a limit on the maximum brightness temperature achievable for an incoherent synchrotron radio source. This limit, commonly referred to in the literature as an inverse Compton limit, prescribes that the brightness temperature for an incoherent synchrotron radio source may not exceed ~10^{12} K, a fact known from observations. However one gets a somewhat tighter limit on the brightness temperatures, T_{b}~10^{11.5} K, independent of the inverse Compton effects, if one employs the condition of equipartition of energy in magnetic fields and relativistic particles in a synchrotron radio source. Pros and cons of the two brightness temperature limits are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Maximum Brightness Temperature of an Incoherent Synchrotron Source : Inverse Compton Limit - a Misnomer

We show that an upper limit of ~ 10^{12} K on the peak brightness temperature for an incoherent synchrotron radio source, commonly referred to in the literature as an inverse Compton limit, may not really be due to inverse Compton effects. We show that a somewhat tighter limit T_{eq} ~ 10^{11} is actually obtained for the condition of equipartition of energy between radiating particles and magnetic fields which happens to be a configuration of minimum energy for a self-absorbed synchrotron radio source. An order of magnitude change in brightness temperature from T_{eq} in either direction would require departures from equipartition of about eight orders of magnitude, implying a change in total energy of the system up to ~ 10^{4} times the equipartition value. Constraints of such extreme energy variations imply that brightness temperatures may not depart much from T_{eq}. This is supported by the fact that at the spectral turnover, brightness temperatures much lower than ~ 10^{11} K are also not seen in VLBI observations. Higher brightness temperatures in particular, would require in the source not only many orders of magnitude higher additional energy for the relativistic particles but also many order of magnitude weaker magnetic fields. Diamagnetic effects do not allow such extreme conditions, keeping the brightness temperatures close to the equipartition value, which is well below the limit where inverse Compton effects become important.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access