Paper detail

Fanaroff-Riley dichotomy of radio galaxies and the Malmquist bias

We examine the possibility that a claimed dependence of the FR 1/2 break value in radio luminosity on the absolute magnitude of the optical host galaxy could be due to the Malmquist bias, where a redshift-luminosity correlation appears in a flux-limited sample because of an observational selection effect. In such a sample, the redshift dependence of a phenomenon could appear as a luminosity-dependent effect and may not be really representing an intrinsic property of the radio sample. We test this on the radio complete MRC (Molonglo Reference Catalog) sample, where Spearman rank correlation and Kendall rank correlation tests show that the correlations are indeed stronger between the redshift and the optical luminosity than that between the radio luminosity and the optical luminosity, suggesting that the latter correlation perhaps arises because of the Malmquist Bias. We further show that similar effects of the Malmquist bias could also be present elsewhere in other correlations claimed in the literature between the radio luminosity and other observed properties of FR1 and FR2 sources.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.