Paper detail

Incongruity of the unified scheme with a 3CRR-like equatorial strong-source sample

We examine the consistency of the unified scheme of the powerful extragalactic radio sources with the 408 MHz BRL sample from the equatorial sky region, selected at the same flux-density level as the 3CRR sample. We find that, unlike in the 3CRR sample, a foreshortening in the observed sizes of quasars, expected from the orientation-based unified scheme model, is not seen in the BRL sample, at least in different redshift bins up to z~1. Even the quasar fraction in individual redshift bins up to z~1 does not match with that expected from the unified scheme, where radio galaxies and quasars are supposed to belong to a common parent population at all redshifts. This not only casts strong doubts on the unified scheme, but also throws up an intriguing result that in a sample selected from the equatorial sky region, using almost the same criteria as in the 3CRR sample from the northern hemisphere, the relative distribution of radio galaxies and quasars differs qualitatively from the 3CRR sample.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.