Researcher profile

Artur Jeż

Artur Jeż contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Solving one variable word equations in the free group in cubic time

A word equation with one variable in a free group is given as $U = V$, where both $U$ and $V$ are words over the alphabet of generators of the free group and $X, X^{-1}$, for a fixed variable $X$. An element of the free group is a solution when substituting it for $X$ yields a true equality (interpreted in the free group) of left- and right-hand sides. It is known that the set of all solutions of a given word equation with one variable is a finite union of sets of the form $\{αw^i β\: : \: i \in \mathbb Z \}$, where $α, w, β$ are reduced words over the alphabet of generators, and a polynomial-time algorithm (of a high degree) computing this set is known. We provide a cubic time algorithm for this problem, which also shows that the set of solutions consists of at most a quadratic number of the above-mentioned sets. The algorithm uses only simple tools of word combinatorics and group theory and is simple to state. Its analysis is involved and focuses on the combinatorics of occurrences of powers of a word within a larger word.

preprint2020arXiv

Balancing Straight-Line Programs

It is shown that a context-free grammar of size $m$ that produces a single string $w$ (such a grammar is also called a string straight-line program) can be transformed in linear time into a context-free grammar for $w$ of size $\mathcal{O}(m)$, whose unique derivation tree has depth $\mathcal{O}(\log |w|)$. This solves an open problem in the area of grammar-based compression. Similar results are shown for two formalism for grammar-based tree compression: top dags and forest straight-line programs. These balancing results are all deduced from a single meta theorem stating that the depth of an algebraic circuit over an algebra with a certain finite base property can be reduced to $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ with the cost of a constant multiplicative size increase. Here, $n$ refers to the size of the unfolding (or unravelling) of the circuit.

preprint2011arXiv

On minimising automata with errors

The problem of k-minimisation for a DFA M is the computation of a smallest DFA N (where the size |M| of a DFA M is the size of the domain of the transition function) such that their recognized languages differ only on words of length less than k. The previously best algorithm, which runs in time O(|M| log^2 n) where n is the number of states, is extended to DFAs with partial transition functions. Moreover, a faster O(|M| log n) algorithm for DFAs that recognise finite languages is presented. In comparison to the previous algorithm for total DFAs, the new algorithm is much simpler and allows the calculation of a k-minimal DFA for each k in parallel. Secondly, it is demonstrated that calculating the least number of introduced errors is hard: Given a DFA M and numbers k and m, it is NP-hard to decide whether there exists a k-minimal DFA N differing from DFA M on at most m words. A similar result holds for hyper-minimisation of DFAs in general: Given a DFA M and numbers s and m, it is NP-hard to decide whether there exists a DFA N with at most s states such that DFA M and N differ on at msot m words.