BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andreas Maletti

Andreas Maletti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputation and Language

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Strong Equivalence of TAG and CCG

Tree-adjoining grammar (TAG) and combinatory categorial grammar (CCG) are two well-established mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms that are known to have the same expressive power on strings (i.e., generate the same class of string languages). It is demonstrated that their expressive power on trees also essentially coincides. In fact, CCG without lexicon entries for the empty string and only first-order rules of degree at most 2 are sufficient for its full expressive power.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Composition Closure of Linear Extended Top-down Tree Transducers

Linear extended top-down tree transducers (or synchronous tree-substitution grammars) are popular formal models of tree transformations. The expressive power of compositions of such transducers with and without regular look-ahead is investigated. In particular, the restrictions of nondeletion, epsilon-freeness, and strictness are considered. The composition hierarchy turns out to be finite for all epsilon-free (all rules consume input) variants of these transducers except for nondeleting epsilon-free linear extended top-down tree transducers. The least number of transducers needed for the full expressive power of arbitrary compositions is presented. In all remaining cases (including nondeleting epsilon-free linear extended top-down tree transducers) the composition hierarchy does not collapse.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Random Generation of Nondeterministic Finite-State Tree Automata

Algorithms for (nondeterministic) finite-state tree automata (FTAs) are often tested on random FTAs, in which all internal transitions are equiprobable. The run-time results obtained in this manner are usually overly optimistic as most such generated random FTAs are trivial in the sense that the number of states of an equivalent minimal deterministic FTA is extremely small. It is demonstrated that nontrivial random FTAs are obtained only for a narrow band of transition probabilities. Moreover, an analytic analysis yields a formula to approximate the transition probability that yields the most complex random FTAs, which should be used in experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On minimising automata with errors

The problem of k-minimisation for a DFA M is the computation of a smallest DFA N (where the size |M| of a DFA M is the size of the domain of the transition function) such that their recognized languages differ only on words of length less than k. The previously best algorithm, which runs in time O(|M| log^2 n) where n is the number of states, is extended to DFAs with partial transition functions. Moreover, a faster O(|M| log n) algorithm for DFAs that recognise finite languages is presented. In comparison to the previous algorithm for total DFAs, the new algorithm is much simpler and allows the calculation of a k-minimal DFA for each k in parallel. Secondly, it is demonstrated that calculating the least number of introduced errors is hard: Given a DFA M and numbers k and m, it is NP-hard to decide whether there exists a k-minimal DFA N differing from DFA M on at most m words. A similar result holds for hyper-minimisation of DFAs in general: Given a DFA M and numbers s and m, it is NP-hard to decide whether there exists a DFA N with at most s states such that DFA M and N differ on at msot m words.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Properties of quasi-alphabetic tree bimorphisms

We study the class of quasi-alphabetic relations, i.e., tree transformations defined by tree bimorphisms with two quasi-alphabetic tree homomorphisms and a regular tree language. We present a canonical representation of these relations; as an immediate consequence, we get the closure under union. Also, we show that they are not closed under intersection and complement, and do not preserve most common operations on trees (branches, subtrees, v-product, v-quotient, f-top-catenation). Moreover, we prove that the translations defined by quasi-alphabetic tree bimorphism are exactly products of context-free string languages. We conclude by presenting the connections between quasi-alphabetic relations, alphabetic relations and classes of tree transformations defined by several types of top-down tree transducers. Furthermore, we get that quasi-alphabetic relations preserve the recognizable and algebraic tree languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access