Abstract

Gurevich (1988) conjectured that there is no logic for P\textsf{P} or for NP∩coNP\textsf{NP}\cap \textsf{coNP}. For the latter complexity class, he also showed that the existence of a logic would imply that NP∩coNP\textsf{NP} \cap \textsf{coNP} has a complete problem under polynomial time reductions. We show that there is an oracle with respect to which P\textsf P does have a logic and P≠NP\textsf P \ne\textsf{NP}. We also show that a logic for NP∩coNP\textsf{NP} \cap \textsf{coNP} follows from the existence of a complete problem and a further assumption about canonical labelling. For intersection classes Σnp∩ΠnpΣ^p_n \cap Π^p_n higher in the polynomial hierarchy, the existence of a logic is equivalent to the existence of complete problems.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.