BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Antoine Henrot

Antoine Henrot contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCmath.APmath.MGmath.SP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A comparison between Neumann and Steklov eigenvalues

This paper is devoted to a comparison between the normalized first (non-trivial) Neumann eigenvalue $|Ω| μ_1(Ω)$ for a Lipschitz open set $Ω$ in the plane, and the normalized first (non-trivial) Steklov eigenvalue $P(Ω) σ_1(Ω)$. More precisely, we study the ratio $F(Ω):=|Ω| μ_1(Ω)/P(Ω) σ_1(Ω)$. We prove that this ratio can take arbitrarily small or large values if we do not put any restriction on the class of sets $Ω$. Then we restrict ourselves to the class of plane convex domains for which we get explicit bounds. We also study the case of thin convex domains for which we give more precise bounds. The paper finishes with the plot of the corresponding Blaschke-Santaló diagrams $(x,y)=\left(|Ω| μ_1(Ω), P(Ω) σ_1(Ω) \right)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Poincaré type inequality with three constraints

In this paper, we consider a problem in calculus of variations motivated by a quantitative isoperimetric inequality in the plane. More precisely, the aim of this article is the computation of the minimum of the variational problem $$\inf_{u\in\mathcal{W}}\frac{\displaystyle\int_{-π}^π[(u')^2-u^2]dθ}{\displaystyle\left[\int_{-π}^π|u| dθ\right]^2}$$where $u\in \mathcal{W}$ is a $H^1(-π,π)$ periodic function, with zero average on $(-π,π)$ and orthogonal to sine and cosine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Body of constant width with minimal area in a given annulus

In this paper we address the following shape optimization problem: find the planar domain of least area, among the sets with prescribed constant width and inradius. In the literature, the problem is ascribed to Bonnesen, who proposed it in \cite{BF}. In the present work, we give a complete answer to the problem, providing an explicit characterization of optimal sets for every choice of width and inradius. These optimal sets are particular Reuleaux polygons.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotic behaviour of the Steklov problem on dumbbell domains

We analyse the asymptotic behaviour of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a Steklov problem in a dumbbell domain consisting of two Lipschitz sets connected by a thin tube with vanishing width. All the eigenvalues are collapsing to zero, the speed being driven by some power of the width which multiplies the eigenvalues of a one dimensional problem. In two dimensions of the space, the behaviour is fundamentally different from the third or higher dimensions and the limit problems are of different nature. This phenomenon is due to the fact that only in dimension two the boundary of the tube has not vanishing surface measure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maximization of the Steklov eigenvalues with a diameter constraint

In this paper, we address the problem of maximizing the Steklov eigenvalues with a diameter constraint. We provide an estimate of the Steklov eigenvalues for a convex domain in terms of its diameter and volume and we show the existence of an optimal convex domain. We establish that balls are never maximizers, even for the first non-trivial eigenvalue that contrasts with the case of volume or perimeter constraints. Under an additional regularity assumption, we are able to prove that the Steklov eigenvalue is multiple for the optimal domain. We illustrate our theoretical results by giving some optimal domains in the plane thanks to a numerical algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Shape optimization of a Dirichlet type energy for semilinear elliptic partial differential equations

Minimizing the so-called "Dirichlet energy" with respect to the domain under a volume constraint is a standard problem in shape optimization which is now well understood. This article is devoted to a prototypal non-linear version of the problem, where one aims at minimizing a Dirichlet-type energy involving the solution to a semilinear elliptic PDE with respect to the domain, under a volume constraint. One of the main differences with the standard version of this problem rests upon the fact that the criterion to minimize does not write as the minimum of an energy, and thus most of the usual tools to analyze this problem cannot be used. By using a relaxed version of this problem, we first prove the existence of optimal shapes under several assumptions on the problem parameters. We then analyze the stability of the ball, expected to be a good candidate for solving the shape optimization problem, when the coefficients of the involved PDE are radially symmetric.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access