Source author record

Antoine Dedieu

Antoine Dedieu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Subset Selection with Shrinkage: Sparse Linear Modeling when the SNR is low

We study a seemingly unexpected and relatively less understood overfitting aspect of a fundamental tool in sparse linear modeling - best subset selection, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to a constraint on the number of nonzero coefficients. While the best subset selection procedure is often perceived as the "gold standard" in sparse learning when the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is high, its predictive performance deteriorates when the SNR is low. In particular, it is outperformed by continuous shrinkage methods, such as ridge regression and the Lasso. We investigate the behavior of best subset selection in the high-noise regimes and propose an alternative approach based on a regularized version of the least-squares criterion. Our proposed estimators (a) mitigate, to a large extent, the poor predictive performance of best subset selection in the high-noise regimes; and (b) perform favorably, while generally delivering substantially sparser models, relative to the best predictive models available via ridge regression and the Lasso. We conduct an extensive theoretical analysis of the predictive properties of the proposed approach and provide justification for its superior predictive performance relative to best subset selection when the noise-level is high. Our estimators can be expressed as solutions to mixed integer second order conic optimization problems and, hence, are amenable to modern computational tools from mathematical optimization.

preprint2021arXiv

Query Training: Learning a Worse Model to Infer Better Marginals in Undirected Graphical Models with Hidden Variables

Probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) provide a compact representation of knowledge that can be queried in a flexible way: after learning the parameters of a graphical model once, new probabilistic queries can be answered at test time without retraining. However, when using undirected PGMS with hidden variables, two sources of error typically compound in all but the simplest models (a) learning error (both computing the partition function and integrating out the hidden variables is intractable); and (b) prediction error (exact inference is also intractable). Here we introduce query training (QT), a mechanism to learn a PGM that is optimized for the approximate inference algorithm that will be paired with it. The resulting PGM is a worse model of the data (as measured by the likelihood), but it is tuned to produce better marginals for a given inference algorithm. Unlike prior works, our approach preserves the querying flexibility of the original PGM: at test time, we can estimate the marginal of any variable given any partial evidence. We demonstrate experimentally that QT can be used to learn a challenging 8-connected grid Markov random field with hidden variables and that it consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art AdVIL when tested on three undirected models across multiple datasets.

preprint2020arXiv

An error bound for Lasso and Group Lasso in high dimensions

We leverage recent advances in high-dimensional statistics to derive new L2 estimation upper bounds for Lasso and Group Lasso in high-dimensions. For Lasso, our bounds scale as $(k^*/n) \log(p/k^*)$---$n\times p$ is the size of the design matrix and $k^*$ the dimension of the ground truth $\boldsymbolβ^*$---and match the optimal minimax rate. For Group Lasso, our bounds scale as $(s^*/n) \log\left( G / s^* \right) + m^* / n$---$G$ is the total number of groups and $m^*$ the number of coefficients in the $s^*$ groups which contain $\boldsymbolβ^*$---and improve over existing results. We additionally show that when the signal is strongly group-sparse, Group Lasso is superior to Lasso.