BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anjeneya Swami Kare

Anjeneya Swami Kare contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

On the complexity of global Roman domination problem in graphs

A Roman dominating function of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a labeling $f: V \rightarrow{} \{0 ,1, 2\}$ such that for each vertex $u \in V$ with $f(u) = 0$, there exists a vertex $v \in N(u)$ with $f(v) =2$. A Roman dominating function $f$ is a global Roman dominating function if it is a Roman dominating function for both $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$. The weight of $f$ is the sum of $f(u)$ over all the vertices $u \in V$. The objective of Global Roman Domination problem is to find a global Roman dominating function with minimum weight. The objective of Global Roman Domination is to compute a global Roman dominating function of minimum weight. In this paper, we study the algorithmic aspects of Global Roman Domination problem on various graph classes and obtain the following results. 1. We prove that Roman domination and Global Roman Domination problems are not computationally equivalent by identifying graph classes on which one is linear-time solvable, while the other is NP-complete. 2. We show that Global Roman Domination problem is NP-complete on split graphs, thereby resolving an open question posed by Panda and Goyal [Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2023]. 3. We prove that Global Roman Domination problem is NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs, planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree five and circle graphs. 4. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm for Global Roman domination problem on cographs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved Approximation Algorithm for Graph Burning on Trees

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, the problem of \gb{} is to find a sequence of nodes from $V$, called burning sequence, in order to burn the whole graph. This is a discrete-step process, in each step an unburned vertex is selected as an agent to spread fire to its neighbors by marking it as a burnt node. A node that is burnt spreads the fire to its neighbors at the next consecutive step. The goal is to find the burning sequence of minimum length. The \gb{} problem is NP-Hard for general graphs and even for binary trees. A few approximation results are known, including a $3$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a $2$- approximation algorithm for trees. In this paper, we propose an approximation algorithm for trees that produces a burning sequence of length at most $\lfloor 1.75b(T) \rfloor + 1$, where $b(T)$ is length of the optimal burning sequence, also called the burning number of the tree $T$. In other words, we achieve an approximation factor of $(\lfloor 1.75b(T) \rfloor + 1)/b(T)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Faster Heuristics for Graph Burning

Graph burning is a process of information spreading through the network by an agent in discrete steps. The problem is to find an optimal sequence of nodes which have to be given information so that the network is covered in least number of steps. Graph burning problem is NP-Hard for which two approximation algorithms and a few heuristics have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we propose three heuristics, namely, Backbone Based Greedy Heuristic (BBGH), Improved Cutting Corners Heuristic (ICCH) and Component Based Recursive Heuristic (CBRH). These are mainly based on Eigenvector centrality measure. BBGH finds a backbone of the network and picks vertex to be burned greedily from the vertices of the backbone. ICCH is a shortest path based heuristic and picks vertex to burn greedily from best central nodes. The burning number problem on disconnected graphs is harder than on the connected graphs. For example, burning number problem is easy on a path where as it is NP-Hard on disjoint paths. In practice, large networks are generally disconnected and moreover even if the input graph is connected, during the burning process the graph among the unburned vertices may be disconnected. For disconnected graphs, ordering of the components is crucial. Our CBRH works well on disconnected graphs as it prioritizes the components. All the heuristics have been implemented and tested on several bench-mark networks including large networks of size more than $50$K nodes. The experimentation also includes comparison to the approximation algorithms. The advantages of our algorithms are that they are much simpler to implement and also several orders faster than the heuristics proposed in the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

On the Tractability of (k,i)-Coloring

In an undirected graph, a proper (k,i)-coloring is an assignment of a set of k colors to each vertex such that any two adjacent vertices have at most i common colors. The (k,i)-coloring problem is to compute the minimum number of colors required for a proper (k,i)-coloring. This is a generalization of the classic graph coloring problem. We show a parameterized algorithm for the (k,i)-coloring problem with the size of the feedback vertex set as a parameter. Our algorithm does not use tree-width machinery, thus answering a question of Majumdar, Neogi, Raman and Tale [CALDAM 2017]. We also give a faster and simpler exact algorithm for (k, k-1)-coloring. From the hardness perspective, we show that the (k,i)-coloring problem is NP-complete for any fixed values i, k, whenever i<k, thereby settling a conjecture of Mendez-Diaz and Zabala [1999] and again asked by Majumdar, Neogi, Raman and Tale. The NP-completeness result improves the partial NP-completeness shown in the preliminary version of this paper published in CALDAM 2018.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access