Source author record

I. Vinod Reddy

I. Vinod Reddy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

On the complexity of global Roman domination problem in graphs

A Roman dominating function of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a labeling $f: V \rightarrow{} \{0 ,1, 2\}$ such that for each vertex $u \in V$ with $f(u) = 0$, there exists a vertex $v \in N(u)$ with $f(v) =2$. A Roman dominating function $f$ is a global Roman dominating function if it is a Roman dominating function for both $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$. The weight of $f$ is the sum of $f(u)$ over all the vertices $u \in V$. The objective of Global Roman Domination problem is to find a global Roman dominating function with minimum weight. The objective of Global Roman Domination is to compute a global Roman dominating function of minimum weight. In this paper, we study the algorithmic aspects of Global Roman Domination problem on various graph classes and obtain the following results. 1. We prove that Roman domination and Global Roman Domination problems are not computationally equivalent by identifying graph classes on which one is linear-time solvable, while the other is NP-complete. 2. We show that Global Roman Domination problem is NP-complete on split graphs, thereby resolving an open question posed by Panda and Goyal [Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2023]. 3. We prove that Global Roman Domination problem is NP-complete on chordal bipartite graphs, planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree five and circle graphs. 4. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm for Global Roman domination problem on cographs.

preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Coloring Problems on Threshold Graphs

In this paper, we study several coloring problems on graphs from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. We show that Precoloring Extension is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by distance to clique and Equitable Coloring is FPT parameterized by the distance to threshold graphs. We also study the List k-Coloring and show that the problem is NP-complete on split graphs and it is FPT parameterized by solution size on split graphs.

preprint2016arXiv

Polynomial-time Algorithm for Isomorphism of Graphs with Clique-width at most Three

The clique-width is a measure of complexity of decomposing graphs into certain tree-like structures. The class of graphs with bounded clique-width contains bounded tree-width graphs. We give a polynomial time graph isomorphism algorithm for graphs with clique-width at most three. Our work is independent of the work by Grohe et al. \cite{grohe2015isomorphism} showing that the isomorphism problem for graphs of bounded clique-width is polynomial time.

preprint2015arXiv

Does diversity of papers affect their citations? Evidence from American Physical Society Journals

In this work, we study the correlation between interdisciplinarity of papers within physical sciences and their citations by using meta data of articles published in American Physical Society's Physical Review journals between 1985 to 2012. We use the Weitzman diversity index to measure the diversity of papers and authors, exploiting the hierarchical structure of PACS (Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme) codes. We find that the fraction of authors with high diversity is increasing with time, where as the fraction of least diversity are decreasing, and moderate diversity authors have higher tendency to switch over to other diversity groups. The diversity index of papers is correlated with the citations they received in a given time period from their publication year. Papers with lower and higher end of diversity index receive lesser citations than the moderate diversity papers.