BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Anirudh Vemula

Anirudh Vemula contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Roboticseess.SYMachine LearningSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Exploration in Action Space

Parameter space exploration methods with black-box optimization have recently been shown to outperform state-of-the-art approaches in continuous control reinforcement learning domains. In this paper, we examine reasons why these methods work better and the situations in which they are worse than traditional action space exploration methods. Through a simple theoretical analysis, we show that when the parametric complexity required to solve the reinforcement learning problem is greater than the product of action space dimensionality and horizon length, exploration in action space is preferred. This is also shown empirically by comparing simple exploration methods on several toy problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Planning, Learning and Reasoning Framework for Robot Truck Unloading

We consider the task of autonomously unloading boxes from trucks using an industrial manipulator robot. There are multiple challenges that arise: (1) real-time motion planning for a complex robotic system carrying two articulated mechanisms, an arm and a scooper, (2) decision-making in terms of what action to execute next given imperfect information about boxes such as their masses, (3) accounting for the sequential nature of the problem where current actions affect future state of the boxes, and (4) real-time execution that interleaves high-level decision-making with lower level motion planning. In this work, we propose a planning, learning, and reasoning framework to tackle these challenges, and describe its components including motion planning, belief space planning for offline learning, online decision-making based on offline learning, and an execution module to combine decision-making with motion planning. We analyze the performance of the framework on real-world scenarios. In particular, motion planning and execution modules are evaluated in simulation and on a real robot, while offline learning and online decision-making are evaluated in simulated real-world scenarios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

TRON: A Fast Solver for Trajectory Optimization with Non-Smooth Cost Functions

Trajectory optimization is an important tool for control and planning of complex, underactuated robots, and has shown impressive results in real world robotic tasks. However, in applications where the cost function to be optimized is non-smooth, modern trajectory optimization methods have extremely slow convergence. In this work, we present TRON, an iterative solver that can be used for efficient trajectory optimization in applications with non-smooth cost functions that are composed of smooth components. TRON achieves this by exploiting the structure of the objective to adaptively smooth the cost function, resulting in a sequence of objectives that can be efficiently optimized. TRON is provably guaranteed to converge to the global optimum of the non-smooth convex cost function when the dynamics are linear, and to a stationary point when the dynamics are nonlinear. Empirically, we show that TRON has faster convergence and lower final costs when compared to other trajectory optimization methods on a range of simulated tasks including collision-free motion planning for a mobile robot, sparse optimal control for surgical needle, and a satellite rendezvous problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access